ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily May 26, 2011
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 35,000+ readers

Comment: EVerify For Everyone - The Supremes just issued their long awaited decision in Chamber of Commerce et al v. Whiting et al (No. 09-115, Supreme Court, May 26, 2011), on Arizona's E-Verify statute (not to be confused with Arizona's much more recent racial profiling statute). The Supreme Court held that Arizona's licensing law is neither expressly pre-empted nor impliedly pre-empted. In other words, states may, within the confines of IRCA, require that beneficiaries of state business licenses use E-Verify, without running afoul of IRCA's anti-discrimination provisions. Now that the Supreme Court has given the green light, we expect that many states, particularly in the South, will rush to enact statutes similar to Arizona's.
A note on ILW.COM's connection to this matter. In a telephone seminar hosted by ILW.COM about 4 years ago, counsel for the legislature of the State of Arizona posed a question to our expert panel on whether a statute constructed in the way that Arizona's ultimately was would pass constitutional muster. The resultant colloquy is now part of the record. Our expert was, of course, Gary Endelman who has consistently called this case correctly. Subsequent to passage of this law, Mr. Endelman believed that the 9th circuit, despite being a notoriously liberal one, would uphold Arizona's statute, and so it subsequently proved. When the case was granted cert, Mr. Endelman once again presciently predicted that should Justice Kagan (who joined the bench relatively recently) recuse herself from this case, then it was exceedingly unlikely that Justice Kennedy would create a divided 4-4 opinion, and asserted instead that Chief Justice Roberts would find a way to write the opinion in such fashion as to encourage Mr. Kennedy to come aboard and create a 5-3 majority. The actual vote on the opinion on the Supreme Court fell exactly as Mr. Endelman predicted. It is due to Mr. Endelman's scholarship on this matter that Immigration Daily has consistently called this case correctly also.
Responding to today's development, Mr. Endelman writes:

This decision is regrettable but hardly surprising and shows the dramatic impact arising from Justice Kagan's recusal. Had she not taken herself out of the case, in all likelihood, there would have been 4 dissenters comprised of the liberal bloc- Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan, pared against the 4 hard line conservatives- Thomas, Roberts, Alito and Scalia. Justice Kennedy would have occupied his customary position of holding the decisive vote. In all likelihood, since Justice Kennedy joined CJ Roberts' majority opinion in full without feeling compelled to write his own concurrence, the results would have been the same but it is impossible to predict that with anything approaching certainty.

Arizona, like all the other states who have enacted immigration control laws loudly and constantly argued that it was not attempting to regulate immigration. Their effectiveness in doing that, as well as the High Court's willingness to go along, stems largely from the very limited definition of "immigration" articulated by the late Justice Brennan in De Canas v. Bica, 424 US 351, 353, 359 (1976) which looked almost exclusively to setting the "terms and conditions of admission to the country and the subsequent treatment of aliens lawfully in the country." Under the De Canas paradigm, immigration did not focus on what happened after admission or arrrival nor did it consider how the actions or conduct of the aliens themselves could be controlled or regulated. Arizona did not attempt to determine who came to the USA or under what terms and conditions but it must certainly sought to influence what they did after they got here. In the world of the 21st century, that is the true definition of "immigration" , one which reflects the great degree to which the nation has moved on since the mid- 1970's and the extent to which the unduly narrow contours of the De Canas definition must be revised to reflect current economic realties. The fact that the advocates of pre-emption did not make this argument the cornerstrone of their appeal produced today's result and was a grievous strategic error whose impact will continue to be felt for quite some to come.

On the issue of immigration policy however (not immigration law), this decision is likely to cause major political upheaval (again something we have been pointing out for many months). As a practical matter, widespread firings of the undocumented will severely disrupt many industries across the country, and furthermore, with all due respect to what the High Court says, widespread discrimination against Americans of color will almost certainly follow. Therefore - and despite the fact that both political parties have a vested interest in the current status quo the status quo on immigration will no longer hold. Congress, and even this 112th Congress with a heavily Republican House, will likely have to step to the plate and address our broken immigration system. The most likely end-game is Congress enacting a combination of benefits and enforcement (most likely mandatory E-Verify and DREAM) into law next year. This decision will almost certainly ensure that immigration will play an important role in the next Presidential election, and conceivably in the upcoming Republican primaries.
There is never a dull moment in immigration law, stay tuned to Immigration Daily for the latest.

Article: The Application For A Regional Center Invites Material Change To Perfect That I-924: The Role Of Transparent Complexity In Preserving Investment Flexibility by Joseph P. Whalen

Article: Debunking The Myth Of "Sanctuary Cities" By Lynn Tramonte

Bloggings: Refugee Admissions Down as a Result of New Security Checks By Jason Dzubow

Bloggings: Correction and clarification By Roger Algase

News: Supreme Court Upholds Arizona Law In Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting

News: USCIS Announces Citizenship Public Education And Awareness Initiative

News: USCIS Publishes Executive Summary Of USCIS Transformation Meeting

News: USCIS Updates H-2B Cap Count

Focus: Website Audit - Your website is your shingle on the internet. It pays to make sure that you are doing things right on your website. ILW.COM's Website Audit report is a quick way of checking your website against best practices, and ensure that it is setup to get you business. We will evaluate your website on five criteria: Page Flow, Interactivity, Traffic, Source Code & Newsletter. The website audit report is only $99! Signup for Your Website Audit Now!

Headline: Supreme Court backs Ariz. business immigration law
Headline: ACLU challenging immigration law
Headline: Lawsuit: Indiana's Immigration Law's No SB 1070, Still Unconstitutional
Headline: Louisiana Lawmaker Withdraws Immigration Bill After Church and Law Enforcement Opposition
Headline: State DREAM Act passes
Headline: Justices Uphold Law Penalizing Hiring of Illegal Immigrants
Headline: California DREAM Act, Part II, Awaits Passage
Headline: Students May Be Suspended After Protest Against Immigration Bill
Headline: Students protest immigration law
Headline: Douglas Students Protest Immigration Law
Headline: are you a stressed out attorney, paralegal or law student looking for a job? Have no fear!
Headline: URGENT: SCOTUS upholds Arizona immigration law
Headline: RT @RussContreras Georgia students walk out of class to protest immigration policies in the state
Headline: RT @rigo_ ACLU Files Federal Lawsuit Against Indiana's Recent Anti-Immigrant Law
Headline: RT @theNewsTaco: Will democrats pass the DREAMact this time?
Headline: RT @DetentionWatch @ImmProf: What about an Immig-Corps?
Headline: RT @rigo_: Connecticut Passes In-State Tuition For Undocumented Students
Headline: Get your ad in ten thousand pages! Improve search engine ranking, increased name recognition and referrals. Sign up at
Headline: cops shoot latino marine 71 times deny him care in arizona
Headline: 3 AZ. officers accused of drug, human smuggling.

To submit an article or a news item to Immigration Daily, write to Follow ILW.COM on Twitter.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Austin, TX - Fulbright & Jaworski LLP has immediate opening for an Immigration Paralegal. Primary responsibilities include preparation of H-1B, L-1, O-1, TN, and E-1/E-2 visa petitions; preparation of PERM labor certification cases; preparation and filing of business and employment-related immigration documentation; extensive communication with governmental agencies and clients; proactive consideration of all options client must consider; and assist with special projects as assigned. Job requirements include Bachelor's degree, a minimum of 3 years, business immigration experience, and excellent written and oral communication skills; must be organized, detail oriented, responsive and have excellent follow through skills; ability to multi-task and work independently, have a strong sense of accountability, and take ownership and responsibility for projects; ability to work well under pressure and work effectively with clients, attorneys and staff, and have flexibility to work overtime when necessary. Knowledge of Microsoft Word, Excel and basic technological and research skills necessary to pull requested documents from online resources and familiarity with legal technology and computer databases required. Qualified candidates may email resume to

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegals
Reston, VA - Goel & Anderson, LLC, a prominent business immigration law firm, has challenging, rewarding, and stable career opportunities for immigration professionals. Due to the sustained growth of our practice, we currently have openings for experienced corporate immigration paralegals. Candidates should have 3+ years of business immigration experience (NIV and IV) with a top-tier immigration practice or in-house corporate immigration department and be able to work in a high-volume case-processing environment. Experience with corporate immigration compliance and/or global immigration matters is a plus. All positions involve extensive client contact and applicants should have excellent verbal and written communication skills, outstanding organizational and time management skills, and be able to perform multiple tasks in a fast-paced environment. An undergraduate degree is required. Goel & Anderson offers highly competitive salaries, outstanding benefits (including fully paid PPO Health, Dental, and generous 401(k) match), and opportunities for sustained career growth. Qualified candidates are invited to apply with resume and cover letter to All submissions will be kept strictly confidential. No phone calls please.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Downtown Washington, DC - Cutting-edge downtown Washington, DC boutique firm seeks a business immigration attorney. Must possess extensive experience with E, L, H-1B, O and EB-1, EB-2 and EB-3. Experience with EB-5 and H-2B a plus. Great national/international clients. No billable hours. Competitive salary and benefits. Warm collegial working environment. Client contact. Growth potential. Must possess excellent writing and client relationship skills. Spanish and/or Chinese language a plus. E-mail resume and references to

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Atlanta, GA - Kuck Immigration Partners LLC, a fast-paced immigration law firm in Atlanta, GA, seeks an experienced Immigration Associate Attorney with approximately 2 years of experience in business immigration and immigration-related litigation. Must be fluent in Spanish. Must be an exceptional writer and motivated to do what it takes to get the job done. Send resume to

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Cambridge, MA - Flynn & Clark, PC seeks an immigration associate with 3-5 years of employment-based nonimmigrant and immigrant experience, including H, L, O, and E visas and labor certification, EB-1, and national interest waiver experience. Individual must have excellent writing skills, demonstrated ability to work with paralegals and to manage caseload independently, and excellent client development and management skills. Experience with Immigration Tracker a plus. Position offers collegial working environment; convenient location to public transportation; senior attorneys willing to mentor; opportunity for participation in client development, firm management, and legal presentations; competitive salary and benefits including a matching 401(k), medical/dental, and short-term/long-term disability; and firm-sponsored continuing legal education opportunities. Please send resume and cover letter to V. Lau at No phone calls please.

Website Services
Gain the competitive edge with your new website from INSZoom, the world's largest immigration software company. Choose from over 100 customizable website template designs, complete with customized logos and images, 60-70 pages of professionally written immigration law content including news articles, processing dates, and priority times posted directly on your site. Our search engine optimization tools will increase your web traffic and prioritize your site in the major search engines. Our content management tool lets you update your site in real time. Customizable intake sheet that can be integrated to your case management software directly into your website. Bi monthly newsletters and email blast tools enable you to stay in constant touch with current clients and strengthen your potential client base. Build leads and maintain a professional presence at a reasonable cost with websites from INSZoom. Learn more online at or contact a sales representative at (925) 244-0600 to start the process of launching your new website today.

To place a classifieds ad in Immigration Daily, see here

Letters of the Week: Letter by Harry DeMell

ComingsNGoings: Immigration Reading
You Can't Be Mexican: You Talk Like Me - By Frank S. Mendez - Kent State University Press, 76 pp. - Hardcover, ISBN: 0873388224, $22.00 -

Readers can share professional announcements (up to 100-words at no charge), email:

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995-2010 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    ISSN:   1930-062X
Advisory Board: Jason Dzubow, Rami Fakhoury, Matthew Kolken, Chris Musillo, Greg Siskind, Joel Stewart