ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily March 27, 2008
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 17,000+ readers


Outsourcing Passports

According to a Washington Post news report, "From 2001 to 2007, 40 to 45 percent of the workers handling passports were contractors, but now 60 percent of the 4,400 passport employees work for private firms, State Department officials said yesterday." For the full story, see here.

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


Latest In Consular Processing

ILW.COM is pleased to announce " Latest In Consular Processing", with Greg Siskind, Christi Hufford, Jan Pederson and Other Speakers To Be Announced. The curriculum for the 3-part phone seminar series is as follows:

FIRST Phone Session on March 31st: Top 10 Issues to Consider in Non-Immigrant Consular Processing Cases

  • Are there any bars on admission and, if so, how do you get them waived?
  • How long will processing take?
  • Can an individual process in a third country and, if so, how do you get the consulate to accept the case?
  • Is a visa even necessary?
  • What role may a lawyer play in the consular application process?
  • What fees must be paid as part of the visa application process?
  • How does E visa processing differ from the normal non-immigrant visa case?
  • What documents does an applicant need to take to the visa interview?
  • How does the case move from USCIS to the consulate?
  • How do you get information on the particular consulate?
SECOND Phone Session on April 10th: Select Regional Consuls - Asia
  • Beijing
  • Seoul
  • Manila
  • India
THIRD Phone Session on May 8th: Select Regional Consuls - Other
  • London
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • United Arab Emirates
The deadline to sign up is Friday, March 28th. For more info, including speaker bios, detailed curriculum, and registration information, please see: (Fax version:


Employment Verification, I-9 Training, No Match, E-Verify And IMAGE
David H. Nachman and Victoria Donoghue share the key issues in employment verification, I-9 training, no-match, E-Verify and IMAGE.

Bloggings: March 27, 2008
Greg Siskind shares the latest entries to his blog.

To submit an Article for consideration, write to


USCIS Releases H-1B Interim Final Rule QAs
USCIS released FAQs related to the interim rule on H-1B visas.


Help Wanted: Immigration Professionals
USCIS is currently hiring for Applications Adjudicators, applications accepted through Wednesday, April 2, 2008. We seek to fill several hundred entry-level Applications Adjudicator positions at the GS-5/7/9 grade levels in the following locations: Dallas, Texas; Lincoln, Nebraska; St. Albans, Vermont; Laguna Nigel, California; and Lees Summit, Missouri. As an Applications Adjudicator, you may plan and conduct independent research concerning eligibility and entitlement of persons seeking benefits, review case documentation to determine legal sufficiency and make recommendations, and perform preliminary fact-finding and initiate further action where information indicates fraud has been detected and review and making determinations on cases. For more information about USCIS career opportunities and how to apply, see here. Please reference Vacancy ID # FCIP-177028. Interested applicants are encouraged to act fast. EOE.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Madison, WI - Quarles & Brady LLP seeks attorney with 2-4 years experience practicing business immigration law. Quarles & Brady, a national law firm with offices in Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida and Illinois, has been providing immigration services for over 30 years. Experience in range of business immigration matters, ability to provide exceptional client service, and superb analytical, organizational and case management skills required. We offer collegial environment and competitive salary and benefits. Submit resume, cover letter, transcripts and at least two writing samples of a substantive support letter or a significant memo to: Michelle Bigler, Manager of Legal Recruiting, Quarles & Brady LLP,

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Charlotte, NC - USCIS Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC) seeks experienced attorney for the position of Associate Regional Counsel, USCIS OCC, Southeast Region. Responsibilities include, but are not limited to, providing legal advice to the Charlotte, NC field office and other field offices on immigration benefits related matters including adjudications involving issues of national security. Applicants must possess JD degree from ABA accredited law school, be an active bar member, and have 1+ year post JD experience practicing law. Preference will be given to applicants with immigration experience, experience in federal court litigation and strong writing skills. For full details, enter COU-CIS-2008-0003 here. Applicants must submit (1) resume, (2) writing sample (10 pps. max), (3) references (4) cover letter. Send to: All submissions must be received by close of business Monday, March 24, 2008. GS-13-15, position open until filled. No reimbursement expenses offered.

PERM Services
At Jon Byk Advertising, Inc., we provide a wide range of services that will help fulfill your PERM recruitment requirements quickly, cost-effectively, and efficiently. With 15+ years of experience working with one of the nation's largest immigration law firms, our customer service is unparalleled. We understand the importance of meeting DOL requirements with regards to ad content, media selection, ad documentation (tear-sheets), and deadlines. We will locate publications that meet DOL and EDD requirements by geographic region, provide upfront pricing, and timely deliver original tear-sheets for all ads (print, online or broadcast). Our experience in recruitment solutions means valuable time saved for you. For more info and a free quote, contact Mya Le at 310-476-3012 or

Immigration Consulting Services
Angelo Paparelli, a nationally-renowned expert with an outstanding breadth of immigration law knowledge and expertise, is available to provide immigration- related consulting services to corporate executives, general counsel, HR departments, foundations, attorneys and law firms in private practice. He consults on employment-based immigration, job portability, remedies for status violations, mergers and acquisitions, immigration-related corporate policies, crisis communication, government investigations, employer sanctions, legislative advocacy, waivers of ineligibility and litigation. Offices in CA & NY. Services: worldwide. To discuss how he can consult on your case, contact Angelo Paparelli at 949-955-5555 or


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.

New Associate London, UK
ASG Immigration is very pleased to announce that Daniel Parisi has joined our corporate immigration team. Daniel, who earned his JD at New York Law School, is a member of the New York Bar and has been advising on US Immigration Law since 2003. Whilst Daniels core focus is on US Consular matters in London and throughout Europe, he will advise clients on all manner of US immigration issues. ASG Immigration also provides UK immigration advice and assistance., (tel) +44 20 7299 3330,


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.

Dear Editor:
I must commend ID's fairness in not dipping into the partisan name-calling and in actually analyzing (along cost-benefit lines) the merits of an Obama, Clinton or McCain Presidency (see 03/26/08 comment). Aside from the fact that neither Clinton nor Obama have ever shown much interest in immigration issues during their tenures in office and McCain has put both his reputation and his standing in the GOP on the line with his sponsorship of comprehensive immigration reform, it is clear that the senator from Arizona is the only one who has consistently reached across the aisle to engage his political opponents. It is extremely difficult to imagine either an Obama or a Clinton appealing to moderates, much less conservatives, in attempting to craft an equitable yet realistic immigration solution since (1) Obama is, by all accounts, the most liberal senator in Congress and (2) Clinton is quite possibly the most controversial. Regardless of how you feel on other issues, one would have to agree with ID that the best choice for any reasonable immigration reform lies with a McCain candidacy. He is has credibility with both Democrats and Republicans and has already shown that, for him, principles trump political affiliation. We only have to remember the enmity of outraged immigration restrictionists who follow Tom Tancredo like lemmings off of a cliff to the prospect of a McCain presidency to know that he is the right choice in November.

Christine Flowers, Esq.
Philadelphia, PA

Dear Editor:
I had to laugh out loud at Jim Robert's letter's (03/26/08 ID) use of scripture to defend Mr. Tanton and his nativist opinion ("Enter ye in at the strait gate" (Matthew 7:13)). In that context Jesus was talking about entering the kingdom of heaven, not the US (and they aren't the same). Anyone who knows anything about our immigration laws knows that they are anything but "straight." A more informative passage from Jesus would be later in the same gospel of Matthew (chap. 25) where he tells a story about the end of the age when Jesus "comes in his glory" to judge "the nations." He separates them into the righteous and the unrighteous, calling them the sheep and the goats. To the righteous, he says, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. ... For I was a stranger and you invited me in ... To the unrighteous, he says, ... For I was a stranger and you did not invite me in ... Jesus spoke a lot more about the "weightier matters of the law" such as "justice, mercy, and faith" (Matthew 23) than about our adherence to unjust, punitive, and merciless immigration ordinances. Where the law is unjust, it should be changed, not held up as some sort of measure of morality.

Roger McCrummen, Esq.

Dear Editor:
Without in any way, endorsing any position of Congressman Tom Tancredo or Lou Dobbs, I respond to Robert Yang's letter (03/26/08 ID) questioning the validity of Mssrs Tancredo and Dobbs' ancestors as they "set foot here," and comparing them and their ancestors to "recently arrived immi- grants" (sic). (Note: As to those "immi- grants" to which Mr. Yang's letter refers - surely his letter means legal immigrants, because illegals are not "immi- grants" - that term having been semantically settled long ago in ID.) I believe the difference is that Mssrs Tancredo and Dobbs' ancestors most likely entered the United States legally, through the immigration process prevailing at the time they sought entry. Or, if by chance either can trace his family roots back to the Pilgrims, or other new world settlers, it must be remembered that in those times there were no immigration laws in America and therefore the Pilgrims and their prodigy were not per se "illegal" on the American shore. The "native Americans" never owned the land it is only under present law that anyone claims title to property. In fact, nobody owns the land of the world, except by law. In reality, we are only temporary caretakers, maintaining the land, the law, and the order of society for the period in history in which we live. The dynasties of China are a perfect example of the ebb and flow of control over the same pieces of land over the last 8,000 years. Like the dynasties of China, control of the United States will no doubt be wrested away to other forms of governance and two thousand years from now, when the squabbles about illegal immigration in the 2000's are long forgotten, immigration policies will have little or no significance in the annals of recorded history.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
Honza Prchal's March 25 letter lists three suggested examples as to how one might allegedly prefer European immigrants without being a racist. These are: "Christian Chauvinism", "anti-racist humanism", and "social democratic solidarity". If "Christian Chauvinism" means pride in one's Christian identity and belief, for example, are there not tens or hundreds of millions of dedicated, believing Christians in non-European countries such as the Philippines, Nigeria, Indonesia, East Timor, South Africa and throughout Latin America? Or does Mr. Prchal's letter's definition of "Christian" exclude members of the Roman Catholic church? Admittedly, that would narrow down the field of non-European Christians somewhat. Turning to "anti-racist humanism", is there such a thing as "racist humanism"? Even if "anti-racist humanism" had some meaning, what evidence is there that only Europeans belong to that persuasion? Are there no "anti-racist humanists" outside Europe whose presence might be welcome in America? Finally, "social democratic solidarity", Here, I am totally confused. Is this a political party of some sort? If so, are non-Europeans not allowed to join? Mr. Prchal's letter's examples of how one can supposedly prefer European immigrants without being racist, are, to the extent that they are comprehensible at all, more than a little bit thin.

Roger Algase, Esq.
New York, NY

Dear Editor:
I strongly disagree that McCain would be the best bet from the immigration persective (see 03/26/08 comment). I don't think he would want to anger his base so soon after taking office. And his base would be furious if he tried to do comprehensive immigration reform. Plus, he has stated that he "gets it," and would not do such reform unless and until the border were secure, which will be a long, long time, (e.g., 100 years). Based on what I have heard to date, I still think Obama has the best policy on immigraton, and the best chance of getting something passed.


Dear Editor:
I take issue with ID's analysis of which candidate would be best for immigration interests, because it is based solely on congressional make-up and political speculation ("A President McCain may well want to work on immigration early on to show that he is a centrist President ..."?) (03/26/08 ID comment). What about the policies the candidates would pursue? Near the beginning of the election cycle, ID published an excellent article that summarized the views of all of the candidates on immigration. I read that article with great interest, and decided that the views of Senator Obama were probably the most enlightened and his goals for immigration policy were the best of the bunch. At that time, I was leaning toward Senator Clinton personally, so I was not altogether pleased to see Obama's policy as better than hers. As for Senator McCain, I found some of what he wants to do repugnant. For many reasons, I now support Senator Obama. The fact that his immigration goals seem to me the best is a significant factor in that decision. I think ID should be careful with quasi endorsements, and I think the view expressed is not a balanced one. Thank you for an excellent publication, which I count on and enjoy very much.

Derin U. Laughter
Raleigh, NC

Dear Editor:
If Mr. Roberts's letter (03/26/08 ID) is of the opinion that anyone who "deviously" advocates for a comprehensive approach to immigration reform is actually advocating open borders, because since CIR is simply an amnesty, it would encourage more illegal immigration circa 1986. This position is wrong, because the bulk of the CIR legislation is devoted to enforcement. If we mandate that nobody can work without a biometric ID card, and only give them to people that have been here for a set period of time, while at the same time we bulk up our border enforcement, it would act as a huge deterrent toward future illegal immigration, the exact opposite of Mr. Robert's assertion. Had Reagan not insisted that there be no increase in federal employees, such as border guards, his plan might have worked as it was intended to. Why not follow in Reagan's footsteps toward humane immigration reform? Also, Mr. Robert's letter doesn't see anything cruel about "enforcement through attrition" even though it's basic fundamental principal is that if the undocumented workers were unable to work, they would have no choice but to leave the country to feed their starving families. As to his personal attack, I hate to burst his bubble, but while I do live in L.A., my apparel manufacturing facility is out of state, and does not use illegal workers. As to my wife's law practice, let me simply state that our nation's current "enforcement only approach", such as it is, does land a lot of people in proceedings. If money were the motivating factor in her decision to practice law, she would have gone into corporate litigation. Don't tell us, or any of the other thousands of immigration attorneys reading this, that these people don't want to be Americans.

Robert Gittelson

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995- American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim                        ISSN:   1930-062X