ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily October 11, 2007
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 17,000+ readers


Practice What You Preach

According to a Washington Times news story, "Under a new directive, every new federal hire is required to be checked against E-Verify, the new name for a decade-old system known as the Basic Pilot Program that has become the backbone of many companies' hiring process as they try to weed out illegal aliens" (for the full story, see here). Before DHS aggressively promotes the system as an effective employment verification tool, we suggest that the US government go one step further and have current federal employees go through E-Verify as well. We suspect that this test will reveal a flawed E-Verify system, resulting in many many USC employees who will test a false positive for not being authorized to work when in fact they are. Uncle Sam should practice what he preaches.

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


New 2007-2008 Editions - Essential Immigration Reference Books

ILW.COM is pleased to offer the new completely revised editions of Patel's Immigration Law Library, the 2007-2008 Edition. This collection includes the essential reference resource "The WHOLE Act, The INA (Annotated), 2007-2008 Edition", used by DHS officials, federal court libraries, and many veteran immigration practitioners. Once you have used this version of the INA, you will wonder why you ever used any other! This collection also features the fully indexed 8 CFR, 2007-2008 Edition, fully indexed 20/22/28 CFR, 2007-2008 Edition , and Patel's Citations, 2007-2008 Edition . Buy the library collection ($100 off). For more info, see here.


An Invitation To Dialogue To Improve Adjudication In Removal Proceedings
Scott Mossman writes "One of the most frustrating situations for me as a practitioner is where the immigration judge has overlooked or gotten wrong an important fact."

Bloggings: October 11, 2007
Greg Siskind shares the latest entries from his blog.


9th Circuit Chastises DOJ Lawyers
In Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-70300 (9th Cir. Sept. 7, 2007), the court issued an order stating "It is the responsibility of the Department of Justice and its lawyers to be aware when its positions have been rejected by the court. While it is acceptable to make a rejected argument for purposes of preserving it for en banc or Supreme Court consideration while acknowledging that it has been rejected by the court, it is not acceptable to repeat an argument already rejected without acknowledging the case that rejected it, particularly where it is the Department of Justice itself that was involved in earlier case. Another such repetition of this same argument in this court will be considered sanctionable behavior."


Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
NY, NY - Lehman Brothers seeks immigration paralegal with 2-4 years experience. Responsibilities include: interacting with HR and employees/prospective employees on immigration matters, advising foreign national employees and HR reps on immigration policy and the preparation of employment-based visas petitions and green card applications. Requirements include: Bachelor's degree in liberal arts or equivalent experience; strong technical knowledge of non-immigrant and immigrant visas; organized and detail-oriented candidate with excellent writing skills; ability to juggle multiple tasks under time constraints; strong interpersonal skills. Visit for detailed information and to apply (select Experienced Hires, search for jobs in Americas, key word: paralegal). Please indicate in cover letter that position was seen in Immigration Daily. EOE.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegals
Exceptional career advancement opportunities available for you in the New York and New Jersey offices of this prominent global immigration law firm. Candidates will work as part of a team of attorneys and professional support staff assisting multinational companies primarily with their US immigration requirements. Job involves extensive client contact and utilization of state-of-the-art case preparation and management systems to prepare, track, and manage cases in process. Congenial and dynamic environment. Only candidates with immigration experience should apply: Job Requirements: - 3+ years business immigration experience, including experience with PERM, - BA/BS degree srequired - MS Word and Windows 2000 required, - Excellent verbal and written communication skills, - Ability to perform multiple tasks in a dynamic work environment. The firm offers highly competitive salaries and excellent growth opportunities. EOE.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Downtown Cleveland, OH - The Law Offices of Margaret Wong & Associates, LPA seeks an employment based immigration attorney with 1+ years of related experience to join its thriving immigration law practice. Founded over 30 years ago, the firm now consists of 9 attorneys and 36 other staff members. Licensed in Ohio preferred. We offer a challenging and exciting work environment and seek a candidate possessing a keen legal mind. Research and drafting skills are a must. Competitive benefits package offered. Interested candidates submit resume and cover letter to or fax to 216-566-1125. No phone calls please.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Downtown Cleveland, OH - The Law Offices of Margaret Wong & Associates, LPA seeks an experienced employment based immigration paralegal with 3-5+ years of experience to join its thriving boutique immigration law practice. Founded over 30 years ago, the firm now consists of 36 staff members and 9 attorneys. Interested candidates submit resume and cover letter to or fax to 216-566-1125. No phone calls please.

Credential Evaluation
Do not order a foreign credential evaluation until you read this. Career Consulting International, offers credential evaluation of your non-US degree. Fast service at low prices. Mention Immigration Daily to receive 3-day rush service at no extra cost (reg. price $70, rush service $70 = savings of $70). H1B and I-140 specialists. Evaluations of 4 year degrees (72hr. rush service) only $70.00. Also 3 year degrees combined with PGD, second degrees, or work experience. Pay online. Toll-free fax/phone numbers. Our clients say it better than we do: "I don't know what to say but you changed my life. In a place that others failed you came and with your evaluation... I just got approved to my I-140." "I'd like to thank you for your services in evaluating my educational documents. You helped me in a difficult situation and through extensive research you were able to get results that other, "bigger" agencies were unable to achieve". Click here to see more testimonials. Free consultation. Call today toll free: 1.800.771.4723

Expert Witness Services
Are you involved in litigation requiring an expert witness with a sophisticated knowledge of immigration law and agency practice? Look no further. Angelo Paparelli and Lory Rosenberg offer their services as expert witnesses. Their litigation experience includes business, tax, employment, personal injury and family disputes as well as criminal-defense. Angelo has twice been named by his peers as the world's leading authority on corporate immigration and received the AILA President's Award for his work in mergers and acquisitions. Lory is a former Judge on the Board of Immigration Appeals, adjunct professor, co-author of the treatise, "Immigration Law and Crimes", and the recipient of AILA's prestigious Edith Lowenstein award. Offices in CA, NY & MD; Services: worldwide. To discuss how we can assist you with your case, contact Angelo Paparelli at 949-955-5555 or


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.

Immigration Event
CIS Ombudsman's Office is pleased to announce that its next teleconference will be: Friday, October 12 - "USCIS Receipting Delay - How Does This Affect You?" 2:30-3:30 pm EDT. We look forward to hearing your comments, thoughts, and suggestions for improvement on this issue. To participate in this call, please RSVP to Please also indicate how you learned about the program as well as the city and state from which you are calling. If you have already sent in an RSVP, thank you. We will acknowledge your RSVP and provide the call-in information shortly before Friday.


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.

Dear Editor:
I don't know where "Verbalist" as posted in his letter (09/10/07 ID) gets his/her definitions, but I have looked in my Black's Law Dictionary and cannot find "ius sanguinis" or "ius soli". I do, however, find "jus sanguinis" and "jus soli," as stated in Jay McTyier's wonderfully insightful letter (09/09/07 ID). Wikapedia's Spanish version calls it "lus soli" and "lus sanguinis". I did find "ius soli" on a great website about Dual Citizenship by Rich Wales, but he does not identify where that term comes from, only claiming it is an alternative to "jus soli". With regard to Verbalist's letter's pontification about "anchor babies" being "base demagoguery", and his letter's claim that the birth of a child is "a nonevent for the parents in the immigration law perspective," his letter would prove itself wrong as rain. First, a US citizen child must be 21 years of age, not 18 as the letter claims, in order to confer immigration benefits on a parent. Second, "anchor babies" are, and have been for many years, a sure way for people to insure that in 21 years they themselves will become permanent residents of the US, while assuring their children can legally be educated in the US, even if they themselves cannot qualify for any type of US visa. Third, the child petitioning a parent does not, as "Verbalist"'s letter contends, need to show they have made over 125% of the poverty level in income. They can merely use a joint sponsor on the Affidavit of Support if they are short on income. What does all this tell us? Leave the interpretation of immigration law to immigration lawyers and keep self-aggrandizing baseless opinions and pseudo-intellectual ramblings out of Letters to the Editor. It serves no purpose to misinform.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
For at least 5 reasons, the term "anchor babies" is even more demagogic than Verbalist's letter pointed out (10/10/07 ID): (1) A citizen has to be 21, not 18, to petition for his or her parents - or, for that matter, for anyone except his or her foreign spouse and children, if any (2) Because of having no legal status out of which to adjust, the long-illegal parents would have to go to their country of citizenship to obtain immigrant visas, and leaving this country would trigger a 10 year re-entry bar (3) Having a so-called anchor baby confers no rights or status on the parents unless and until they eventually, if ever, receive green cards (4) For the petitioner's siblings, add on an additional waiting period of 10 to 12 years for immigrant visa availability before their departure and 10 year re-entry bar kick in (5) A citizen can petition for no relatives other than his or her spouse, children, parents and siblings. Petitioning for grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc., is impossible except in anti-immigrant mythology. In short, so-called anchor babies are poor anchors indeed.

Sid Lachter, Esq.

Dear Editor:
This commitment to illigals, while using Americans to fight wars that, even if the GI survives and comes home would be unemployed, him and his family no access to medical, and its confusing This thinking about patriotism when the rich and powerful are giving all the benefits of citizenship and even to not provide for the veterans welfare, is daunting. What an age, when men go off to fight its countries wars and all the benefits go to those whom have no claim nor have sacrificed for our country. I am a Viet Nam Veteran, and had to leave my homeland, because the government, the president, the Catholic Church is aiding illigals, and my family and I are just economically pushed aside.

David Utterback

Dear Editor:
The native protectionists are not only absurd to hope they can be exempted from global competition because of their citizenship, but also evil if they enjoy the sweet labor of those modern "slaves" from third worlders who must earn 10-30 times less than them with no opportunity to improve because of apartheid immigration and trade barriers, and yet dare to preach about human rights, equality, free market and I got sicker if they dare to call themselves as "compassionate conservative Christians".Yes, West Germans must help East Germans when they reunited, wealthier South Koreans must help their North Korean brothers and sisters if they reunite in the future. In E.U. richer members help poorer newer members, otherwise the Poles, Latvians, Estonians will flood France, Germany and UK for sure. As investments coming to newer member nations and their economy is booming, they are more than happy to stay in their own respective countries. I apologize to anybody that get offended by my blunt letters. But folks, please stop living in the illusions, closing the border doesn't mean we can take anything for granted and exempted from the global competition.

Robert Yang

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995-2007 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim                        ISSN:   1930-062X