ILW.COM - the immigration portal Seminars

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Listserv Q&A for
"Immigration Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Problems, Solutions and Best Practices"

For more info, or to signup online, click here.
For more info, or to signup by fax, click here.


I have a question that was not reached because time ran out. Could you ask the panel to answer the following question?

Regarding police reports, Lory Rosenberg stated that they are not admissable to prove conviction. However, police reports are admissible for discretionary purposes, tho not to prove the elements of the offenses. See Matter of Teixeira, 21 I&N Dec. 316, BIA 1996; and Matter of Grijalva, 19 I&N Dec. 713 (BIA 1988). Since discretion is important to so many forms of relief, how can practioners deal with this situation? ie, the admission of police reports for discretionary purposes results in denials of relief and order of removability. Anyway to prevent or limit?

Since judicial review of discretionary decisions is severely limited if not totally barred by the INA, I am quite concerned with this, as many cases require appeal of BIA summary affirmance.

Any thought would be most appreciated.

Answer by Lory Rosenberg:

Yes, they can be used to defeat relief as a matter of discretion. No ideas about how to avoid that other than to challenge/deny the portion of the report that is inconsistent with the conviction itself and provide evidence to rebut it in the discretionary phase of proceedings.