ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
If there was an Attorney General advocating only Immigration Daily's preferred interpretation of liberty from one of the following three: "hegemonic liberty", "reciprocal liberty" or "natural liberty", but not "ordered liberty", thereby "elevating his own concept of liberty over all the others" (as Immigration Daily phrased it) would Immigration Daily then be acusing that person of "diminished liberty in America, not enhanced it”? If Immigration Daily did not act in a consistent fashion, then that would be intellectual dishonesty.

Dan Ehrlich, Attorney at Law

Editor's Note: Mr. Fischer's point (in his book, "Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America") is that it is the tension between all four visions of liberty that keeps the American tradition of liberty alive. He opines, and we agree, that elevating any one of the four over the others would diminish liberty.



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: