ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
Your editorial equating Reagan's shining hill speech to "famous words on immigration" as if the former President intended these idealistic words from his 1989 farewell speech to be every day entry policy, is misleading. He was obviously waxing eloquent on this occasion, using poetic license, particularly with "the doors are open to anyone" comment. Emma Lazarus did the same thing in her heart touching sonnet, The New Colossus, with: "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,"   Neither of these were intended or can be the realistic basis for immigration policy. Similar comments can and have been made about our US highway systems as being the best in the world where citizens can freely drive. This does not mean that both highways and immigration policies should not be subject to practical limitations and regulations including the removal of those there unlawfully and those not abiding reasonable restrictions for the public safely. Our borders are our collective property rights defining the sovereignty of our nation. Those who violate our borders and/or immigration policies have violated our laws and the various amnesty proposals some are trying to pass violate the rule of law. It is a poor precedent (pun intended) as is allowing Mexican trucks here. You could have used Reagan's more practical comment: "This country has lost control of its borders. And no country can sustain that kind of position." Regarding your June 4th editorial comment on Gary Endelman's collection of essays, he is to be commended for his belief that policy "should be based on whether immigration is good for America, not on whether immigration is good for immigrants." Unlimited and/or excessive immigration is not good for America, only reasonable, limited, controlled and allocated entry policies will protect and benefit US.

R. L. Ranger



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: