ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
While nobody knows better than immigration lawyers that our nation's immigration laws and procedures need a total overhaul, Sherry Arciniega, and the general public must understand that no matter how simple an immigration filing may at first seem, there are pitfalls and blunders that can cause serious delay, and that require the assistance of competent legal counsel to resolve before an application or petition is filed. Furthermore, Mrs. Arciniega and the general public must understand that 1) Immigration Officers and Consular Officers sometimes do not know the law, and that 2) neither the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and the State Department is in the business of providing immigration advice and problem solving. Only immigration lawyers, and some qualified non-profit organizations who use immigration lawyers to assist them, are in the business of immigration problem solving. Ms. Arciniega's description of her husband's plight makes no legal sense whatsoever, and she has obviously been victimized by her own frugality and then provided incorrect advice, or misunderstood advice, by a U.S. Consular Officer. More than likely, if Mrs. Arciniega had paid a modest professional fee to a competent immigration lawyer for the preparation and filing of her Relative Petition, and the preparation of her husband's consular visa package, he or she would have advised them on the proper procedure filing a U.S. citizen spousal I-601 Waiver, and her husband would be in the USA with a Green Card today. Instead, she seems to have received government double-speak from a Consular Officer, who has no vested interest in assisting she and her husband. As the old saying goes, "She got what she paid for."

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: