ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
Someone keeps asking for PERM to make Balca decisions more precedent setting. I believe that the original formulation of PERM eliminates the need for BALCA altogether. If anyone ever objected to the original rulemaking, the information was never passed along by DOL. They should still have to open up PERM for public objections at a time close to enactment, and this is something we should object to. It appears that the only thing open to appeal in the PERM system is prevailing wage. This will mean that anyone and everyone connected with the DOL can make up their own concept of what is an adequate test of the labor market, a restrictive requirement, etc. and there will be no way to object, let alone any precedent. Does anyone have any ideas on how to open a dialogue, as this would seem to be a significant loss of due process rights. Speedy decisions are only valuable when other rights are retained.

Michelle Skole



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: