ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
On January 29, 2004, Immigration Daily published an article by Josie Gonzalez entitled "I-9 Anomalies That Challenge Employers: TPS, Refugees & Asylees, H-1B Transferees and Subcontractor Obligations." In her article, Ms. Gonzalez noted that the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices is "a branch of the new Office of Homeland Security." Please be aware that the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices is not, in fact, part of the Department of Homeland Security. Rather, it is a component within the Civil Rights Division at the US Department of Justice, and protects US citizens and legal immigrants from employment discrimination based upon national origin or citizenship status, retaliation, and unfair documentary practices related to the employment eligibility verification process.

Jorge Martinez
Department of Justice Spokesman

Editor's Note: Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The article has been updated to reflect this correction.



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: