ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
In the "Editor's Comments" on 11/12/03 you put forth an interesting hypothesis about the impact that a possible run by Pat Buchanan for the presidency would have on the chances of an amnesty (Yes, I know you call it "legalization") for illegal aliens. In doing so you used the term "anti-immigrationists" and wrote that they're a "miniscule group". If you're referring to people who are "anti" all immigration, I believe you're correct. If you're referring to people who favor drastically reducing immigration, I believe you're incorrect. The polls have been discussed (and cussed) often on ILW.COM and they indicate that a very large majority of citizens (and many immigrants) want a reduction in legal immigration and an end to illegal immigration. Surely you can't be saying that virtually all those polls are wrong?

John H. Frecker
Baileyville, ME



Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: