ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
We think the premise of ILW.COM's editorial, that supporting the war is will be good for immigrants, is mistaken. Putting to one side the merits of the war, your editorial risks the very harms you complain about, namely, connecting immigrants with a particular point of view. While you are right to point out that in times of war immigrants often stand accused of lacking patriotism, not all supporters of patriotism are pro-war. In fact, a poll released today on New York One shows that by a 51-35% margin, residents of New York oppose the current war. It is quite possible that antiwar patriots could use your editorial as evidence that Bush's war is being waged on behalf of immigrants, especially those from countries the support Bush's war effort or appear, in the eyes of antiwar patriots, to stand to benefit from the war. Given the heated political climate in New York City (and the rest of the country) the best course for immigration advocates is to refrain from taking a position on the war, just as you would do not (we assume) take positions on abortion, the separation of church and state or the death penalty. None of this, however, should be taken as a criticism of your right, as editor of ILW.COM, to take a pro war stance. But if you choose to do so you should do it on the merits, rather than arguing that such a stance will help immigrants. We do not think it will.

Robert A. Kahn
Jacqueline Baronian