ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
In his letter on 12/16/02, while extolling illegal aliens from Mexico, Dr. Richard Baer cited a study from UCLA, dated 9/10/01. He quotes the study as saying that illegal aliens contribute $300 billion to the US economy yearly. I couldn't find the study on the "web", but I'd be interested to see what they counted to come up with the $300 billion figure. I suspect they ignored the costs of illegal aliens on welfare, medical services, subsidized housing, jail costs, etc. A few things I've found on the "web" are: (1) a study released by the NAS (Nat'l. Academy of Sciences) in 1997 which says that immigration (legal and illegal) costs to each native US household are a net loss of between $166 and $226 per year. This translates to a net drain of between $11 and $22 billion per year nationally; (2) an article in the San Diego Union on 8/20/01 which said that, based on figures by the NAS, the net fiscal drain for an average adult male Mexican, over his lifetime, is a total of $55,200; (3) a study by Dr. George Borjas of Harvard University which said that immigration costs US workers $133 billion in "wage depression" and "job displacement"; (4) an article (source unknown) which said that, in 1999, the states asked the US government for $1.484 billion in reimbursement for the costs of incarcerating illegal aliens. They were given $573 million to split up from a program at the Dep't. of Justice - SCAPP - and were had to fund the rest themselves; (5) a 1994 Urban Institute study showing that immigration created a surplus of $29 billion annually, but only after it excluded from its calculations all immigrants from Mexico, Poland, Cambodia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Viet Nam, and the former USSR; (6) a 1997 study by professor Donald Huddle of Rice University which says that the estimated net cost this year of immigration - both legal and illegal - will be about $66 billion; (7) a 1995 study from the National Bureau of Economic Research which estimated that immigrants would receive total benefits - direct and indirect - of about $180 billion in 1996.

I apologize for the poor format of the foregoing, but I wanted to try to show that not everyone thinks that immigrants are a net benefit. Those who profit most are the business owners, often at the cost of loss of jobs and depressed wages for native workers.

John H. Frecker
Baileyville, ME