ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
I am one of your subscribers. I just wanted to take a second to tell you the humor of the "Cotton Mather" (overly picky, and missing the more important big picture in life), correction one day of one of your editorial summaries. The humor was that the complaining, criticizing attorney had stated that you had been redundant (totology) chicken-pouley (you get the point) in your stating that a matter had been sent back down and also remanded. As a top English student graduate from a major University, former law review member, and published attorney author in a law review... I can tell you that what you did was actually good. What you did was to clarify to an audience with some para professionals and lay persons that "remand" means for the higher court to return the opinion back to the lower court for additional findings or other action. Next time, perhaps, put the definition in parenthesis/es for the non-lawyers. This is actually the best writing, when you make your word usage of terms clear for all of your readers. Further, the complaining attorney, misspelled the word redundant as redundent if I recall properly, in his complaint to the Editor! Today, perhaps, someone will complain that the Chinese woman was not smuggling illegal aliens, but rather the baggage claims in her underpants... if you read that sentence order-- it's a hoot! One day, I wrote in about the Pro Bono work a lot of us do when one of your readers was attacking "all immigration attorneys," the reader assumed I was a male... I was complimented as an accomplished linguist. That reader has such a negative outlook on all other humans, focusing on only the bad in groups of other people. It's too bad. Well, back to work! Keep up the good work!

Immigration Atty. in Minnesota.


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: