ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily                        <Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly 

Law Offices

Gibbs Houston Pauw

1111 Third Avenue Suite 1210
Seattle, Washington 98101
voice: (206) 682-1080
fax: (206) 689-2270

Robert H. Gibbs 
Heather Houston 
Robert Pauw


Marie Higuera

Grace Huang

October25, 2000 (OA_EID:0_OA)





          INS has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit challenging its vehicle seizure practices.  The case, Gete v. INS, No. C98-881Z, was filed in Seattle in 1994.  It covers over 100,000 vehicles seized by INS in the Western Region (California, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, and northern Idaho) between June 10, 1989 and September 17, 1999.  A court hearing on the settlement is scheduled for Seattle on November 20th.

          The vehicles were seized by INS based on allegations that the drivers were helping undocumented aliens enter the United States.  Some of the cars were forfeited, while others were released on payment of a fine.  The ten plaintiffs who brought the suit alleged that INS had seized the vehicles without probable cause, failed to inform them about the facts that justified the seizure, and imposed penalties arbitrarily and excessively.  Many of the plaintiffs said that they had no idea that the passengers in their cars were ineligible to come to the United States.

          Plaintiffs won an important victory from the Ninth Circuit on August 4, 1997, (No. 95-35408), when the court found that INS had violated the due process rights of the plaintiffs by failing to adequately explain the reason for the seizures and by failing to provide  an adequate chance to respond to the charges.  After the case was sent back to the lower court to resolve several remaining matters, the INS reached a settlement with the plaintiffs.

         Under the terms of the settlement, INS has agreed to revise the notices given to vehicle owners; adopt guidelines to insure uniform non-excessive fines; train officers on standards for probable cause; provide copies of adverse evidence to vehicle owners; render decisions in writing; and provide for reconsideration of fines.

        Persons whose cars were seized by INS in the Western Region during the ten year period can file a request for reconsideration of any fine or forfeiture that was imposed, after having an opportunity to review all the adverse evidence. The date for filing a request for reconsideration will be established by the court, but is expected to be within approximately three to four months of November 20, 2000.   If INS determines that the fine was excessive, the difference will be refunded.

         Class members should review the settlement prior to the November 20th hearing.  Objections must be submitted to the court and to the attorneys for INS and the plaintiffs not later than November 15.

        The Notice on the Proposed Settlement, and the Settlement Agreement, are available at   For further information: Robert H. Gibbs or Robert Pauw, 206-682-1080.