[Congressional Record: June 30, 2000 (Senate)]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001--CONFERENCE REPORT
Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, if I could turn to the military construction
appropriations conference report, that is a very good bill that passed
way back in May, I think it was May 18. This important military
construction conference report passed the Senate under the leadership
of Senator Conrad Burns, but from the very beginning, it was a bill
that did have some emergency provisions attached to it. We did have the
funds for the costs, the money that has been already spent for the
defense for Kosovo, and some additional funds for costs associated with
Over a period now of almost 6 weeks, there has been a process
underway between the House and the Senate on both sides of the aisle to
get an agreement on this conference report that included a title II
that had the emergency funds for the Kosovo situation, for the Colombia
drug war, and also for emergencies associated with Hurricane Floyd, the
fires, and other issues.
During the process of the conference, other issues were added. Some
issues that were in were taken out. That is the way a conference works.
I must confess that I didn't get a look at the final product myself
until this morning. I think we actually had access to it last night. We
did get access to it. Senators had an opportunity to review that. If
points of order need to be made, they can be made. But this is for
military construction and for emergencies. We need to get this done. It
is already late. There are a lot of people, there are a lot of
different reasons for how that happened, but here we are. As majority
leader, I have a responsibility to try to bring it to a conclusion and
take whatever time that requires.
I want to outline the situation as it now stands. I ask unanimous
consent that the Senate now proceed to the conference report and it be
considered as having been read. I further ask unanimous consent that
following 10 minutes for debate between the two managers, and the
chairman and ranking member, Senator Gramm be recognized to raise a
point of order. I further ask unanimous consent Senators Stevens and
Byrd be immediately recognized to make a motion to waive and, following
10 minutes equally divided on the motion to waive, the Senate proceed
to a vote on that motion with or without any intervening action or
Mr. McCAIN. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from Alaska.
I obviously am disturbed about much that was put into this
legislation. But I see a $6 billion savings here. So I think it is a
reasonable compromise. I intend to put in the Record as well as on my
web site and many other places some of the really egregious projects
that are in this bill. At the same time, this significant savings I
think is a very important move.
I will not object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The report will be stated.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R.
4425) ``making appropriations for military construction,
family housing, and base realignment and closure for the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September
30, 2001, and for other purposes,'' having met, after full
and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do
recommend to their respective Houses as follows:
That the House recede from its disagreement to the
amendment of the Senate, and agree to the same with an
amendment and the Senate agree to the same. Signed by all of
the conferees on the part of both Houses.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senate will proceed to the consideration
of the conference report
The conference report is printed in the Record of Thursday, June 29,
Mr. BURNS. Mr. President, I am pleased to bring before the Senate the
Military Construction Conference Report for fiscal year 2001.
The Senate and the House went into conference with very different
recommendations for projects and unfortunately, not enough money to go
We have worked hard with our House colleagues to bring the Military
Construction Conference to a successful conclusion.
We have sought to recommend a balanced bill that addresses key,
military construction requirements for readiness, family housing,
barracks, quality of life and funding for the reserve components.
In the final conference agreement relating to military construction,
we met our goals of protecting quality of life and enhancing mission
readiness throughout the Department of Defense.
It provides a total of $8.8 billion in spending, an increase of $200
million over the levels recommended by both the House and Senate, and
an increase of $800 million over the President's budget request.
It is my hope that we can move this bill forward very quickly and
send it to the President.
Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, late Thursday, the conference concluded
on H.R. 4425, the Fiscal Year 2001 Military Construction Appropriations
First, though, let me say a few words about the Coast Guard's
current--and precarious--budget situation and how this Conference
Report will help keep it afloat--at least for the remainder of this
fiscal year. The reality is that our Coast Guard has been forced to cut
back on its current services this year and could be forced to cut back
even more next year. These reductions make it far more difficult for
the Coast Guard to meet its many missions. They put at risk the
sustainability of valuable fish stocks in the North Atlantic and
Pacific Northwest. They reduce the Coast Guard's capability to stem the
flow of illicit drugs and illegal immigration into the United States.
And they can work against the Coast Guard's ability to respond quickly
to search and rescue situations, which often in fishing grounds and
high traffic migrant areas.
As early as last February, the Coast Guard began reducing its
operating hours in the air and at sea. In some parts of the country,
operating hours have been reduced as much as 20 to 30 percent.
Fortunately, Mr. President, the Conference Report we passed today
will carry the Coast Guard through the current fiscal year. In total,
more than $700 million is provided to help restore the Coast Guard's
aircraft and vessel spare parts supply; cover the cost of rising fuel
prices; pay for rising health care costs and quality of life
improvements for Coast Guard personnel; and increase by six its fleet
of C-130 aircraft--assets critical to the Coast Guard's counter-drug
and search and rescue capabilities.
The Coast Guard's law enforcement skills extends as far as the Middle
East, where Coast Guard cutters and tactical law enforcement teams
enforce the continuing U.N. embargo against Iraq.
Perhaps one of the Coast Guard's toughest jobs is the day to day
enforcement of U.S. immigration law. It is an emotional and gut
wrenching mission. It challenges Coast Guard men and women daily to
carry out their responsibilities with due regard for the law, human
dignity and, above all, safety of human life. It is a tough job. But,
day in and day out, the Coast Guard continues to carry out its duties
with professionalism and a never-ending commitment to the people it
The bill includes a $12 million one-time appropriation to be split
equally between Arizona, Texas, California, and New Mexico to help
cover the overwhelming costs associated with processing criminal
illegal immigrants and the significant number of border-related drug
It also includes a one-time, $2 million appropriation for Arizona to
assist Cochise County and other affected jurisdictions along the U.S.-
Mexican border that are incurring significant costs for local law
enforcement and criminal justice processing because of record-breaking
levels of illegal immigration and smuggling of drugs and people into
Dr. Tanis Salant, a professor at the University of Arizona, is close
to completing a study on unreimbursed costs that occur as a result of
increased illegal immigration in the area. He estimates that Arizona's
border counties collectively spend $15.5 million to bring criminal
illegal aliens to justice. Cochise County spends 33 percent of its
overall local criminal justice budget to process criminal illegal
immigrants. This does not even include incarceration costs, which are
…I think we have done a good thing today, an important thing. It is
important we finish this work prior to the time we leave. This bill
will now go to the President, as it should. I know he will sign it. I
think we are ending the way we should have ended, on a high note with a
good deal accomplished.
Share this page
Bookmark this page
The leading immigration law publisher - over 50000 pages of free information!
© Copyright 1995- American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM