Make Sure You Get It
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are combating spam through a variety of
filters and blocking software to trap emails before they even reach one's
email inbox. The upshot is that many ISPs are incorrectly categorizing
legitimate email as undesired and preventing these emails from ever reaching
your inbox. If you are experiencing email delivery issues, your ISP may have
blocked Immigration Daily delivery. To reduce the chances of this happening
to you in the future, please add Immigration Daily (firstname.lastname@example.org) to your
email program contact list, mark the email as "not junk" or add it to your
"white list"--whichever is applicable. This lets your ISP know that you want
the email delivered and reduces the chance of it being blocked. In spite of
this, If you do not receive your Immigration Daily issue anytime, please
contact the customer service of your ISP to report the problem and let us
know of the problem by writing to email@example.com.
We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Deadline For Removal For Experts Is Wednesday, Feb 18th
Wednesday, Feb 18th is the deadline for "Removal For Experts" a 3-part
telephone seminar series, the curriculum is as follows:
FIRST Phone Session on February 19: Right to Counsel in Removal Proceedings
SECOND Phone Session on March 19: The Changing Definition of Crimes of Moral
- Statute/regulations explaining the right to representation in removal
- EOIR attorney disciplinary regulations
- Lozada vs. Compean
THIRD Phone Session on April 16: Litigation Tactics in Removal Proceedings
- The Categorical and Modified Categorical Approaches
- BIA Case Law with a Focus on Matter of Silva-Trevino
- Federal Circuit Court Case Law
Don't wait to register. Wednesday, February 18th is the deadline! For more
info, including speaker bios, detailed curriculum, and
registration information, please see: Online: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/200905.shtm
Fax form: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/200905.pdf
- Motions to Continue, Administratively Close or Terminate
- Motions to Change Venue
- Motions to Suppress
- Contesting Charges in the Notice to Appear
- Authentication of Documents and Responding to FDL Reports
Three Basic Tips To Help Law Students Transition From Wallflowers To Networkers Extraordinaire
Paramjit L. Mahli writes "In today's fast-paced, global technological environment, law schools and students must realize that leaving law school with a good law degree is no longer enough to ensure professional success."
Hello, I Love You, Won't You Tell Me Your Name: Inside the Green Card Marriage Phenomenon
David Seminara for the Center for Immigration Studies writes "Are Americans the most beautiful, charming, and seductive people on the planet or are we in demand as marriage partners by those in the developing world in part because marrying a U.S. citizen is the quickest and easiest path toward becoming an American lawful permanent resident (LPR, also called having a "green card")?"
Immigrants Of The Week: Ram Shriram, Tapan Thakur, and Jin Kyu Robertson
Greg Siskind celebrates the achievements of these immigrants.
To submit an Article for consideration, write to email@example.com.
CRS Report On Worksite Enforcement
The Congressional Research Service released a report on performance measures for immigration-related worksite enforcement.
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Beverly Hills, CA - Busy immigration law firm has immediate opening for experienced, hard-working and creative self-starter. Candidate must be able to thrive in challenging, trial-oriented environment where deadlines are critical, must be active bar member (any jurisdiction), and have experience in handling nonimmigrant business and/or NIV visas and consular practice,
PERM, family, removal proceedings, as well as BIA and Circuit Court Appeals, and federal litigation. Must have following: demonstrate quick analytical ability and facility to articulate critical issues in case; have superior oral and writing skills, strong research and interpersonal skills, and good judgment; possess excellent courtroom skills and exhibit ability to work in professional manner with others, demonstrate computer literacy skills. Expected to do own legal research and writing and to be
substantially self-sufficient in preparing day-to-day correspondence/pleadings. Occasional travel required; bilingual a plus, but not essential (spanish or korean) No relocation reimbursement. Send cover letter, resume, + writing sample (max. 10 pps. in MS Word or Adobe PDF format) to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Eurasia Translations, Inc. has been proud to serve immigration attorneys and individuals since 1993 with the translation of personal documents, academic credentials, criminal clearance letters, etc. Our customers can rest assured that all of our translations are prepared in accordance with USCIS requirements and are accompanied by a notarized certificate of accuracy. For more information, please call 888-887-1884 or visit our website. For a free quote, please complete http://www.eurasia-usa.com/quoteRequestForm.html or fax your document at 818-907-9763.
Case Management Technology
Are you ready for the new changes in immigration? See why INSZoom has a 99% customer retention rate. Use our forms with peace of mind - 800+ updated within 24 hours of any new release, no patches or downloads. E-File 20+ forms. Access your firm's online database anywhere you have internet access. Client relationship management tools, practice management tools, group calendaring, emails, notes, reports, invoices, auto email alerts and reminders, document storage and assembly. A library of customizable
questionnaires, letters and email templates included. Online access for clients to check case status included. Compliancy modules: I9, LCA, AR 11, PERM. Optional services: credit card processing, Outlook & QuickBooks integration. One-time data entry and auto population into all documents will save you time and reduce errors. Customizable to support solo practitioners, mid-large law firms & corporations. We teach you how to customize the software to fit your
processes and communication needs. Founded in 1999, INSZoom is a profitable, financially sound company, employing 100+ engineers, sales, and support staff. INSZoom is ISO 27001:2005
certified and the "world's largest immigration software company", built with
flexible modules that allow you to manage and control technology. To
schedule a complimentary online demo, call 925-244-0600 or email
Rahm's Immigration Turnabout
It was not so long ago that Rahm Emanuel was on the House Democratic leadership team and being accused of throwing immigrants "under the bus" for the sake of strengthening Democrats' power in the House.
Thirty-thousand Haitians Ordered To Leave US
U.S. immigration authorities say they've ordered 30,000 Haitians to leave the country.
Four More Expected To Plea Guilty In Immigration Case
Lawyers expect plea agreements in the cases of four defendants who still face criminal charges from the federal immigration raid at the BP Whiting Refinery in December.
Paths To American Dream Converge In Immigration Court
Each of 26 immigration judges presides over a tiny courtroom, with room for just a dozen or so spectators. On average, each judge hears more than 1,000 cases a year.
Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: email@example.com. Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.
Immigration Event - Denton, TX
March 12, 2009 - The University of North Texas is presenting a conference on immigration that will bring together nationally known figures and local experts to provide to the public a lively, balanced discussion of the challenges facing the US today. The conference is open to all and free of charge. The deadline to register is March 9, 2009. Tickets will be emailed after March 9, 2009 (include email address on the registration). Only 500 tickets available, register early, http://www.coba.unt.edu/rsvp/.
Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: firstname.lastname@example.org (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.
Mr. Murray's letter (2/13/09 ID), in response to a letter by Ms. Krishnamurthy (02/12/09 ID), makes the statement that the quota system is not discriminatory because it allocates the same number of visas to everyone regardless of national origin. However, a "per country limit" which says we don't want too many of X to come here is discriminatory, if not on its face, through its effect. A person may agree with this discrimination but that's exactly what it is. It's not a surprise that immigration law is discriminatory as throughout its history it has been used by racists to restrict groups that were deemed "unworthy". Any doubt about this shows a basic ignorance of the history and the law. Furthermore, Mr. Murray's letter states that Ms. Krishnamurthy's letter is attempting to "muzzle" the free speech rights of Americans as guaranteed by the First Amendment when her letter states that whether or not the American immigration system is welcoming is an opinion best left to those who actually go through it. This statement is nonsensical as the First Amendment is about the government restricting free speech rights. This comment shows a basic ignorance of our Constitution. Though Mr. Murray's letter is entitled to its opinion about whether or not our system is welcoming (it's not according to my clients who have to suffer through it) the letter writer is clearly not best position to make this assessment and neither are most Americans. As far as not allowing those who would immigrate to the US a voice about how to reform the system because of their prejudices and self-serving opinions I would add that Americans with prejudices and self-serving opinions on the matter should be excluded from the discussion as well.
Justin G. Randolph, Esq.
David Murray's letter (02/13/09 ID) asserts that my letter misrepresented INA 202(a)(2) in claiming that it is discriminatory. It is ironic that his letter quotes the preceding section, 202(a)(1), to refute my letter's claim. That section in fact owns up to discrimination in the INA. I remember the first time I read 202(a)(1) because I chuckled to myself when I read the following sentence (the first part of which Mr Murray's letter conveniently left out in his letter): "Except as specifically provided in paragraph (2) and in sections 101(a)(27) , 201(b)(2)(A)(i) , and 203, no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence". Discrimination in the INA is not a matter of interpretation, it is enshrined in that very act as you can see. It is not everyday that you see the text of a discriminatory law admitting to the discrimination as if to say "that's the way it is, deal with it.". That said, I am surprised and sorry that my letter offended anyone. I would have been happy to engage in a discussion on per-country limits on immigrant visas. But I have always believed that when discourse degenerates into an argument on First Amendment rights, it has probably lost its value.
Our constitution recognizes that all human beings are created equally, the Bible shows us that Jesus and all ancient Israelis' patriarchs were once refugees and immigrants themselves in foreign lands and teaches us to be Good Samaritans and sharing and loving unconditionally. Yes, I am a humanist and a globalist who believe that humanity must tear down the walls of apartheid, injustice, selfishness, greed and ignorance, not a selfish "faithful conservative" believer who cherry pick verses to justify their hypocrisies. Still, none here dare enough to answer my valid question about what rights given to them to establish labor, goods and services monopolies, to limit competition and choices on the market on goods and services and what rights also to give them rights to complaint about OPEC monopoly and manipulation on oil prices or other nations imposing trade barriers on US products and services or cable service monopoly with their jacked up price in their own towns. We must abolish welfare state, restore the integrity on Wall St. as a place where investors really want to invest in companies not trying to be speculators and treat it as a huge casino, and we must guarantee freedom of movement worldwide of self sufficient, skilled human beings who would like to trade the fruits of their labor, goods and services to highest bidders and buyers, without those losers trying to impose restrictions to discourage competition, and we should held our politicians and governments worldwide accountable if they don't protect the value of currencies, print money and spend recklessly and creating inflation everywhere and eating up our savings and prosperity.
Jim Roberts's letter (ID 2/16/09), ends with the phrase, "Oh, I see, said the blind man." In terms of Jim Roberts letters that revolve around the theme of Restrictionism, perhaps a more appropriate phrase would be, "Oh, I see what I want to see," said the man wearing blinders. These blinders prevent one from seeing that at one time, everyone in this country, citizen or not, has an ethnic background, even if that ethnicity is Anglo-Saxon. I find the generalization of calling citizen members of any ethnic class less "American" to be offensive and xenophopic. I find that when the letter states that, "R. Yang and others claim to be Americans, but have globalist views which precludes nationhood," I can't help but feel that the letter has an intolerant view of the constitutional rights of Americans that don't march in lock step with the letter's narrowminded views of how "Americans" are supposed to think. His letters advocate that we simply ignore the causes, and by enforcing the laws already on the books, then the "solution" will correct itself. This narrow minded "blinders" mentality is ludicrous, as it doesn't so much address the causes, and attempt to find workable solutions, as it does to sweep the problem under the rug, and who cares if we tear apart families, destroy lives, and devastate our own fragile economy? I honestly don't have a problem with the fact that the letters of Jim Roberts have a fundamentally different viewpoint as to what is best for this country. However, I have a huge problem with the fact that the letters assume a "holyer than thou" stance the precludes the chance that the letter might be wrong - or that people with other opinions might be just as American as the letter's author.
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995-2008 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to email@example.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.