Rep. Tancredo To Retire
According to the Hill, "A spokesman for Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) confirmed Monday that the congressman will not seek another term in Congress in 2008, regardless of his fate in the presidential race." For the full story, see here.
We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Adjustment In Removal Proceedings
The curriculum for the November 1st phone session on "Adjustment In Removal
Proceedings" is as follows:
The deadline to sign up is Wednesday, October 31st. For more info, including
speaker bios, detailed curriculum, and registration information, please see:
http://www.ilw.com/seminars/september2007.shtm. (Fax version: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/september2007.pdf).
- Reopening old deportation or removal orders
- Adjustment after pre-1996 exclusion order
- Understanding the new "arriving alien" regulations
- Retaining portability in removal - overview of emerging case law
- Remands to District Director vs. merits hearing before Immigration
- Seeking continuances until adjustment eligibility
- Adjustment as a defense to crimes-based removability
Consular Corner - October 2007
Liam Schwartz, Esq. presents the latest news from Consuls the world over.
USCIS Issues Application And Receipting Update
USCIS issued an updated application and receipting update, effective as of October 26, 2007.
USCIS Terminates TPS For Burundi Nationals
USCIS published notice of termination of the designation of Burundi for temporary protected status, effective May 2, 2009.
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorneys
San Diego, CA - Larrabee / Mehlman /Albi /Coker LLP, a leading business immigration law firm has openings for senior associate attorneys and associate attorneys. Both positions require experience in labor certs, NIV categories (senior position requires experience in all NIV categories), AOS and consular processing as well as NIW, extraordinary ability, multi-national and researcher petitions in high volume, fast-paced immigration firm. Sr. Associate Attorney - must have 5+ yrs of business immigration experience with direct management of corporate clients' immigration legal needs. Experience should include managing support staff. Associate Attorney - must have 2 yrs. business immigration experience. Strong writing and verbal communication skills required for both positions. Excellent benefits. Salary commensurate with experience. Great place to work and enjoy your chosen career. CA bar membership a plus. Send resume with salary expectations to: email@example.com.
Help Wanted: Immigration Professional
New York City - Mount Sinai Medical Center seeks senior immigration specialist. Manage case files, prepare and process non-immigrant, employment-based immigrant petitions, and processing permanent residence applications. You will use Immigration Tracker software and have knowledge of the breadth of immigration procedures. Good writing and analytical skills required. Requires positive attitude + effective communication skills. Applicants must have strong work ethic and demonstrate initiative, as well willingness to work as team-player. Fast paced office with high case volume. Excellent opportunity to learn all areas of immigration law for a dedicated professional. College degree and 3+ years immigration experience required. No lawyers please. Compensation = $60,000+. For complete details and to apply online, visit The Mount Sinai Careers website (Requisition # 07-47803).
Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Downtown Miami, FL - Immigration boutique law firm seeks paralegal with 2+ years of experience in business immigration. Must have
experience with PERM, but also H, L, and E visas, and residency processing. Must be fluent in English and Spanish. Competitive salary, benefits. Fax resume to 305-577-0095 or email Armando Mosquera, Office Manager: firstname.lastname@example.org. No phone calls please.
Case Management Technology
Are you ready for the new changes in immigration? See why we have a 99% customer retention rate. Use our forms with peace of mind - 800+ updated within 24 hours of any new release, no patches or downloads. E-File 20+ forms. Access your firm's online database anywhere you have internet access. Client relationship management tools, practice management tools, group calendaring, emails, notes, reports, invoices, auto email alerts and reminders, document storage and assembly. A library of customizable questionnaires, letters and email templates included. Online access for clients to check case status included. Compliancy modules: I9, LCA, AR 11, PERM. Optional services: credit card processing, Outlook & QuickBooks integration. One-time data entry and auto population into all documents will save you time and reduce errors. INSZoom's case management system is customizable to support solo practitioners, mid-large law firms & corporations. We teach you how to customize the software to fit your processes and communication needs. Founded in 1999, INSZoom is a profitable, financially sound company and now employs 70 engineers and 11 sales and support staff. INSZoom is the "world's largest immigration software company", built with flexible modules that allow you to manage and control technology. To schedule a complimentary online demo, call 925-244-0600 or email email@example.com.
Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.
CIS Ombudsman's Office is pleased to announce that its next teleconference will be: "USCIS Receipting Delay II - How Does This Affect You?" - November 2, 2007 2:00-3:00, EDT. "N-648 Medical Waivers - How Are They Working For You?" - November 2, 2007 3:30-4:30 EDT. We look forward to hearing your comments for improvement on these issues.
RSVP to email@example.com. Indicate how you learned about the program as well as the city and state from which you are calling.
Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: firstname.lastname@example.org (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.
I believe, much to the shagrin of anti-immigrationists, that John H. Frecker's letter is correct in his analysis (10/29/2007) of the attitudes of the majority of Americans, who do not see legal immigration as a threat to the nation, but
rather as a necessary commity if America is to keep its place as a leader in
the 21st century. However, I am bothered by references to "secure borders"
as a goal to solving immigration problems. In reality, "Secure borders" in
the immigration debate is nothing more than government double-talk, a
buzzword for anti-immigrationism. America does not need to secure its
borders against illegals, it needs to secure its borders against terrorists
and drug dealers - functions of central intelligence and customs
enforcement, respectively. We must not equate immigration with general
lawlessness, but rather pass laws to insure that people cannot reap the
benefits of the American dream unless they are legally present in the United
States (however, I do support the concept of the DREAM Act as an exception).
Securing America's borders will never happen so long as the US government
sponsors the largest drug importers in the world, Afghanistan and Colombia
and embraces despotic governments who sponsor terrorist activities, all the
while proclaiming them to be America's allies. Truly securing America's
borders should not be a function of the USCIS, USICE or USCBP and it is
regretable that when the government moved the function of immigration
control from the US Department of Justice to the newly formed Department of
Homeland Security, that the issue of immigration became so inextricably
linked to homeland security that the issues have become hopelessy obfuscated
to the point where nothing will function properly.
David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA
I applaud Mr. Algase's well stated letter (10/29/07 ID) about double standard and hypocrisy about white vs. non white "amnesty" on illegal immigrants. If most of these "illegals" were Italians, probably Mr. Tancredo would be happy to provide them "special" treatment as well, and he wouldn't call it as "amnesty". As Ireland economy is booming and so most of western Europe with their stronger than ever Euro, as Canada does so with its strengthening currency as well, we rarely see any of them will immigrate to the US. They will come here to shop and spend not to look for jobs paid by less attractive US dollar. Cheap USD is good for US economy because foreigners will shop and spend here more and buy more US made goods but also hurts Americans buying power as price on imports will rise. Mr. Lou Dobbs at CNN always rant about job outsourcing and how immigrants will steal jobs from "middle class" Americans, but he never offers any realistic solutions on how we can make competitive and attractive USA with strong US dollar, cheap imports and yet we can reverse the deficit into surplus by miracles. Lou Dobb's job is the one of the easiest jobs in the planet which is to complaint over and over, and I think CNN pays him too much and might to consider to outsource that job to any willing Americans or even foreigners who can complaint much better for much less.
Responding to ID's 10/26/07 comment, the following statement "A count of states with unanimous votes by both Senators from each
state reveals that the vote fell along the old Union/Confederacy line. 9 out of 14 states that unanimously voted no represent the
original Confederate states, and 12 out of 17 states that unanimously voted yes represent the original Union states. This
is the 21st century, yet sadly, we appear to have regressed back to the days of the Civil War" is irrational and reveals an ignorance of the current situation in the states which were formerly members of the Confederacy. These types of statements from both sides of the debate prevent rational discussion of the issues and drive away many who would like to come to a reasonable solution to the problem. What really is a regression to the mid-19th Century is the uncompromising attitude of both sides of the debate, that is, treating someone as evil because he or she does not agree with your opinion.
Kenneth R Washburn
To compare the votes of the DREAM Act to the tragic Civil War and the states that each side represented is completely outrageous and seems to equate anti-illegal immigration to that of the old confederacy supporting slavery (see 10/26/07 ID). The pro-open border advocates continue to believe that the majority of Americans somehow support illegal immigration or back door amnesties. This commentary is another example of how the Northern pro-open border people are out of touch with the rest of America. What part of "we don't want to reward illegal behavior with amnesty" don't you understand?
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995-2007 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to email@example.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.