DREAM which was scheduled to come for a vote as recently as yesterday to the Department of Defense (DOD) authorization bill did not make it to the floor. We excerpt the following from Frank Sharry, Executive Director of the National Immigration Forum,
"The DREAM Act will be tabled until mid-November when Majority Leader Reid intends to set aside time for its debate. Sen. Reid has consistently demonstrated an earnest resolve to push the Senate to deliberate serious reforms to America's dysfunctional immigration laws. We thank Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Richard Lugar (R-IN) for their behind-the-scenes efforts to move the DREAM Act this week, and take the Majority Leader at his word that he will do all within his powers to address this important issue. However, we will also take at their word several Senators, mostly Republicans, who said they support the DREAM Act but had concerns about the vehicle to which it was being attached this week. Since the Congress is unlikely to pass major reform this year, narrowly targeted measures like DREAM and AgJOBS would serve as stopgap measures ... Narrowly targeted measures like the DREAM Act, which have garnered support in both houses and both parties, can point the way towards real improvements for American families, the American economy, and the bright future of immigrants in this country."
We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to email@example.com.
Investor Visas Workshop
ILW.COM is pleased to announce an Investor Visas Workshop in Chicago, IL on Friday, October 19, 2007 (the first Investor Visas Workshop, held in Orlando, FL this June was completely sold out). For details on curriculum, speaker bios, and registration information, please see:
http://www.ilw.com/workshops/october2007investor.shtm. The save $100 deadline
is Sept. 28th, don't delay, act today!
Negotiate Your Way To Success
Michelle LaBrosse writes "Negotiation is accessible to us all and is a critical skill for professional and personal success."
Bloggings: September 28, 2007
Joel Stewart shares the latest entries from his blog.
Complaint Says Illinois Law Prohibiting E-Verify Participation Conflicts With Federal Law
In US vs. State of Illinois, (USDC Central District of IL Springfield Div., Sept. 24, 2007), the US filed a complaint seeking a declaration that federal law preempts Section 12(a) of the Illinois Act (limiting enrollment in any employment eligibility verification system), on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law and/or that it otherwise presents an obstacle to accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of federal law.
DOS Issues DV-2009 Instructions
The Department of State issued for the 2009 Diversity Immigrant Visa Program (DV-2009).
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorneys
NY, NY - Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, an international
immigration law firm seeks (3) experienced immigration associates. Position (1) requires 2-4 years business
immigration experience, as an attorney; Position (2) requires 4-6 years business immigration experience, as an attorney; and Position (3) requires 3-5+ years of business immigration experience, a proven track record as
writer on immigration issues, and the ability to work under pressure. Ideal candidates familiar with all aspects of business immigration, including NIV and IV, have had extensive client contact, and can perform multiple tasks in fast paced, high volume environment. Must also possess excellent verbal and written communication skills. Competitive salaries + excellent benefits offered. Please send cover letter, resume, writing sample, + salary history to firstname.lastname@example.org. Fragomen is an equal opportunity employer.
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Dallas, TX - USCIS Office of Chief Counsel (OCC) seeks experienced attorney for Service Center Counsel position at the Texas Service Center. Responsibilities include, but not limited to, providing legal advice to TSC personnel on issues involving immigration related adjudications, inadmissibility and deportability grounds, and national security. Applicants must possess JD degree, be an active member of the bar and have 1+ years of post JD experience. For full details, enter: COU-CIS-2007-0009 here. Preference given to applicants with immigration experience, excellent academic record, + strong writing skills. Submit cover letter demonstrating specific skills, experience, and interests qualifying candidate for position. Applicant should list references but recommendation letters not necessary. Applicants must also submit a resume and a writing sample (max. 10 pps). Send to: Reid Tilson, Deputy Chief of the Service Center Counsel Division, at TSC.email@example.com. Must be received by close of business Friday, 9/28/07. Position is at the GS-13-GS-15 levels. Open until filled. No relocation reimbursement expenses available.
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Chicago, IL - VISANOW streamlines the immigration process for corporations and their foreign employees by combining comprehensive legal expertise, unparalleled customer service and patented, groundbreaking technologies. The first company to automate all aspects of the U.S. visa and immigration application process from end to end, VISANOW maintains its pioneering spirit and status today by continuing to offer services that revolutionize the management of immigration matters. VISANOW seeks a transactional immigration attorney to join our downtown Chicago team and help deliver legal advice and counsel to our clients who include companies, individuals, colleges and universities. JD required with 2+ years experience working as an attorney in immigration law. For a detailed job description, see here. We offer a competitive compensation plan and excellent benefits including medical, dental, life, disability, 401K and stock purchase programs. If you're interested in taking the next step of your career with an industry leader, e-mail your resume and salary requirements to firstname.lastname@example.org with the title Attorney in the subject line. Relocation assistance to Chicago is not provided. EOE.
Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Milwaukee, WI - Prominent national business immigration law firm seeks a senior associate to provide management and oversight to its work flow and team development and act as point person to the Managing Partner on all case related activity in the firm. Milwaukee, located on the shores of Lake Michigan, is the 25th largest city in the US. This is a great opportunity
for an Attorney who wants to get off the billable grind and manage in a team environment for a quality boutique practice. The firm services a mix of high end corporate clients in a relaxed, professional environment. Must be self-motivated, have an eye for detail, possess excellent writing skills and demonstrate passion for immigration law through intimate knowledge of statutes, regulations, and policy memoranda. JD with 5 years experience in business immigration law required. Forward resume + cover letter to email@example.com. All communication treated in confidence. Salary and benefits commensurate with experience and abilities. This is a blind posting.
Help Wanted: Immigration Professional
Progressive and quickly growing law firm seeks individual interested in working in a business development capacity full time. Familiarity in immigration law as well as marketing and business development experience required. Demonstrated record of achievement in marketing/business development necessary. Ideal candidate is self starter, motivated, and capable of national or regional coverage. Qualified attorneys or immigration professionals are invited to apply. Competitve package, incredible benefits and tremendous incentives. Can work from any location. Interested candidates should send resume, salary history + references to Rami Fakhoury: firstname.lastname@example.org. All inquiries will be kept confidential.
Adnet Advertising Agency Inc. has provided labor certification advertising services to immigration attorneys since 1992. Adnet helps attorneys find appropriate places to run labor cert ads, places the ads, obtains the tearsheets, and offers a variety of billing options. Attorneys can manage the entire ad process through Adnet's secure web-based Ad-managment system. Most of Adnet's services are free since we receive a commission from the newspapers and journals where the ad is placed. Adnet services large international law firms as well as solo practice attorneys. Call us at 212-587-3164, visit www.adnet-nyc.com, or email us at
email@example.com. Contact us today to find out why we are the ad agency of choice for immigration attorneys since 1992.
Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.
Free Chicago Event For Employers
Azulay, Horn & Seiden, LLC (in conjunction with ILW.COM) presents a
forum: "Immigration in the Workplace: What You & Your Employees Should Know"
- Thursday, October 18, 2007 9am-1pm, Chicago, IL. The events of this past
spring and summer have dramatically changed the face of immigration policy.
Now is the time to learn how to prepare and respond to these changes and to
increased enforcement. For more information see here:
Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: email@example.com (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.
Bruce A. Hake, Esq.'s letters, complains about "nonstop letters" (09/27/07 ID), and includes me in his letter's harangue, along with David Utterback, a very frequent contributor to ID Letters to the Editor. But in reality, the record will show that I have contributed exactly two letters to ID in the month of September - on 25th and 26th - the exact number Mr. Hake's letter suggests should be appropriate in this type of forum. That being the case, perhaps rather than the frequency of my letters, it is the content, to which Mr. Hake's letter takes exception, given that he and I have gone head-to-head in disagreement in ID's Letters to the Editor section before. Sour grapes and personality clashes do not add any measure of fruitfulness in the discussion on immigration reform any more than do faulty or unverifiable statistics, misstatements of the law or prognostications that go far beyond the expertise of a contributor. ID offers a unique forum for the interchange of ideas on a very high level of sophistication compared to other such forums on the subject, and while we may not agree with the positions taken by others, so long as the letters are coherent and not personally degrading, offensive or blatantly incorrect on the law, we can all learn from the viewpoints of others and appreciate that there are other viewpoints on the complex issues of immigration reform. I commend ID for offering this largely unrestricted forum and commend all the editorial contributors to ID, each and every one, whether or not I may agree with their position, which contribute to the exchange of ideas and the spirited debate on US immigration issues.
David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA
My friend and colleague, Greg Siskind, the immigration guru, noted in yesterday's ID that anti-immigration forces should align themselves with the ILlinois in its legal battle with Uncle Sam: ".... I believe the Illinois law is unconstitutional because it preempts a federal immigration law and under the Constitution, that authority is reserved for Congress. Funny thing is that the anti-immigrants would be smart to side with Illinois on this one because if Illinois loses, state and local laws around the country seeking to enforce immigration laws will be in even greater trouble." What Greg didn't say, but clearly implied, was that pro-immigration forces should jump in on behalf of DHS on this one. Bar Associations, AILA, the ACLU, MALDEF, et al. should be lining up against Illinois to file amicus curiae briefs against the power of any state to regulate immigration. That is clearly the issue here and why the forces of light should get involved to uphold federal supremacy. If Illinois can bar employers from using E Verify, state authorities in any other state can require it or impose any other anti-immigrant restriction they feel like as a legitimate exercise of their police powers.
Illinois is the aberration folks. The whole national trend is the other way. Clearly, it's not possible to comply with Illinois law and also comply with federal law which makes E Verify available in all states. That is known in legalese as "conflict pre-emption" which is why the federal courts will enjoin the Illinois law from ever taking effect as they should.
There is no more powerful symbol than joining with the US Government to strike down any state attempt to regulate what only Congress can under the Supremacy Clause. Let's not let this golden opportunity pass us by.
Gary E. Endelman, Esq.
I agree with Bruce Hake's letter (09/27/07 ID) that those of us who write to ID often might do well to think about limiting the length and frequency of our contributions. But while his letter describes a feeling of wanting to groan under the weight of all the letters, nothing makes me groan as much as seeing the words "no letters" in an ID newsletter. Fortunately, this does not happen often, and is unlikely to do so in the future, even if Mr. Hake's letter's advice is heeded. My personal view however, is that the most attention of all should be directed to the quality of the letters, rather than to how long they are or how often someone may choose to write. A long letter is not necessarily a bad one. Nor does writing frequently mean that one has run out of important topics to write about, particularly in these times when the immigration system is facing so many challenges.
Roger Algase, Esq.
New York, NY
I agree with Mr. Hake's letter's observation (09/27/07 ID) that the letters have become tiresome and also Mr. Prchal's letter (09/27/07 ID) that they are often irrelevant to immigration law issues. It was unfortunate that Mr. Murray's letters were named as an offender, as his letters are cogent, relevant and informative. It appears to me that letters to the Editor have taken on the aspect of a chatroom because of input from too many with little or no background in immigration law. Some of their comments are so off target and poorly stated that I am embarrassed for them. It does seem to inhibit productive dialogue in this important forum for discussion of current issues. I'd like to see the clutter removed, but have no idea how ID could accomplish that. I trust ID will receive more than a few suggestions.
With endless mean spirited baseless accusations on how "Jose" the illegal steals welfare, waste US taxpayers' money, contribute to more pollution, crime, terrorism, devalue US dollar etc., yet it's very much relevant to talk about these things in fairer and more balanced view instead of blaming everything on "Jose" the illegal for convenience. I am not a banker nor stock broker but when Americans wonder why we don't have money for our schools, health care, crumbling highways, bridges etc., we must ask the Congress and our President why they can afford another $ 190 billions dollar to fund the wars in Iraq and Afganistan. We must ask our President why he wants to veto SCHIP for sick uninsured American children while he asks Congress to approve another $ 190 billions for wars funding. We must screen immigrants coming here not because we want to please the "nativists" here that feel that because they're Americans, they don't have to compete with their merits in the global stage and job markets but because we want to make sure that these immigrants are not looking for "free" welfare and want to commit horrendous crimes and terrorism to our innocents. The rights of any human beings to live, move, work and seek better opportunities, live and safety are always legal and moral. It should be legal and moral for Americans to be hired by Japanese, Chinese or Indian companies over their own citizens there if Americans can show better skills, merits and productivity over them while willing to accept the terms and conditions given by those companies. As global consumers must be free to shop for the best deals, businesses should be free to hire the best human resources for less as well. It should never be illegal nor immoral.
I am a Viet Nam Veteran, my chldren American citizens and yet we were denied the benefits illegals were receivng. The American family cannot compete against government that is criminal in their opposition to the oath of office. So, now we live in The Philippines, still registered voters in Sarpy County, NE. The DREAM act should require a contitutional convention as should have NAFTA as it opposed the defense and protection of the US and its citizens. I should hope our massive military constitutionally is to protect the people of the US and not just the physical infrastructure. It seems with all the military, all the provisions for protection, our government has allowed invaders into our country and the harm to US citizens and their ability to compete against illegals whom have no assets to lose, are the winners. The passage of the DREAM act will not end to disparity, but must intensify into civil confusion. Once the Congress votes for DREAM, then the constitution is forever tarnished and problems will multiply. My family prefers to live in the country I and my ancesters fought for its flag, but we cannot. The state does not care about American low middle class citizens that have been gainfully employed all their lives, but rathers gives the aid of the state to illegals whom have no legal grounds. The current UAW strike, is a continuation of a multiplication of problems
that is incurred by NAFTA and the states, and Federal government looking the other way, allowing millions of illegals an unfair advantage over U.S. citziens. This probelm will not go away by the passage of DREAM, but will no doubt intensify resulting in loss of U.S. prestige. I thank ID for permitting a fair forum, not suppressing views other than illegals. I commend ID for its editorial ethics.
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1995-2007 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to firstname.lastname@example.org. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.