ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily July 13, 2006
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 17,000+ readers


What Does ILW.COM Stand For

A recent letter to the Editor asked, "What does ILW.COM stand for?" An Editor's note (07/11/06 ID) misstated that it stood for immigration lawyers on the web. This is no longer true. In 1995, ILW.COM was created by the Hake family as a web hosting and design company which hosted websites for immigration attorneys. At the time, ILW.COM used to stand for immigration lawyers on the web. ILW.COM has evolved and is a law publishing company. ILW.COM does not stand for anything in particular now. However, many readers believe that Immigration Law on the Web is an appropriate description for "ILW" in ILW.COM.

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


The Indispensable All-In-One CSPA Handbook - Shipping Now!

ILW.COM is pleased to present the Child Status Protection Act Handbook by Charles Wheeler of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLINIC):

  • Chapter 1: Overview Of Age Out
  • Chapter 2: Overview Of The CSPA And Implementation
  • Chapter 3: The CSPA And Family-based Visas
  • Chapter 4: The CSPA And Employment-based Visas
  • Chapter 5: The CSPA And Diversity Visa Lottery
  • Chapter 6: The CSPA And Asylee/Refugee Processing
  • Chapter 7: The CSPA And VAWA
  • Twenty-four Appendices
  • Numerous CD-ROM Resource Materials
For more info on the Child Status Protection Act Handbook, and to order, see here.


Update From The AILA 2006 Annual Conference On Immigration Law
Elizabeth T. Reichard provides an update on some of the "hot topics" addressed on the morning of June 22 of the week-long AILA conference.


CRS Immigration Related Border Security Legislations
The Congressional Research Service released an updated report on the main legislative issues facing the 109th Congress relating to the movement of people across the border, both at POE and illegally across the US international land border.


Help Wanted: Immigration Professional
Corporate/immigration Legal Assistant - Moore & Van Allen PLLC has an exciting opportunity in business immigration law with a large, full service law firm in Charlotte, NC. Prior immigration experience not required. However, candidate must have interest in working with large business immigration practice with multinational clientele. Candidate must be well-organized and have strong attention to detail. Candidates fluent in Standard Mandarin and/or Standard Cantonese preferred. Preference also given for candidates with experience working with clients in China, Singapore, or Japan. Salary is negotiable and commensurate with experience. Attractive benefits package offered. Relocation assistance may be provided to the right candidate. Please submit letter, resume and salary requirements to Stephen Hader Esq.:

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Charlotte, NC - Large business immigration practice seeks experienced immigration paralegal. Undergraduate degree required. Candidate must be well-organized; have strong writing, communication, and computer skills; have strong attention to detail; and have ability to work independently on multiple tasks. Prior employment-based immigration experience preferred. Candidate should also have experience working with Fortune 500 clientele and international executives. Salary negotiable and commensurate with experience with an attractive benefits pkg. Relocation assistance may be offered to right candidate. Submit cover letter, resume + salary requirements to Steve Hader Esq.:

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Phoenix, AZ area - Join a team that works hard in a relaxing, collegial atmosphere. Employment-based firm with Fortune 500 clients seeks a full-time paralegal. Must have at least two years employment immigration experience including H-1B, L-1, TN and labor certification. Physician J-1 waiver and NIW experience a plus. Must be highly motivated, detailed-oriented and have outstanding communication, technology and people skills. College degree preferred. Excellent salary and benefits including health, dental, vision, long and short term disability and retirement benefits. Arizona offers year-round hiking, camping, boating, professional sports and the Grand Canyon. Email cover letter with resume + salary requirements to Theresa Talbert:

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Quarles & Brady seeks attorney with 1-3 years of business immigration law experience for our Milwaukee and Madison, Wisconsin offices. We are a national law firm, providing immigration services for 30+ years, with offices in Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida and Illinois. Requirements: experience in range of business immigration matters; ability to provide exceptional client service; and superb analytical, organizational and case management skills. Collegial environment and competitive salary and benefits. Submit resume, cover letter, transcripts and at least two writing samples (substantive support letters or significant memos) to: Michelle Bigler, Manager, Attorney Recruiting, Quarles & Brady LLP at

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorneys
San Francisco, CA - Berry, Appleman & Leiden LLP, a global corporate immigration law firm seeks experienced attorneys with 3+ years practicing business immigration law. Our attorneys work in a fast-paced, high volume practice and utilize carefully developed procedures, advanced practice tools, and a state-of-the-art case management system. Experience in a range of business immigration matters, ability to provide exceptional client service, experience managing teams of legal assistants, and superb analytical, organizational and case management skills required. We strive for excellence in legal practice in a collegial environment, promoting cooperation and learning from each other. We offer competitive salary and benefits. Please submit resume to or fax 415-217-4426.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegals
Upper Saddle River, NJ - Business immigration law firm has several openings for experienced immigration paralegals for a very busy immigration practice. Candidates must have solid experience in business immigration law, including preparation of O-1, TN, L-1, H-1B, R-1 petitions and PERM labor certification cases. Experience with I-9 audits and training and employment verification process. Labor and employment experience a plus. Responsibilities include the preparation and filing of business and employment-related immigration documentation and communications with government agencies and clients. Must have excellent organizational skills, multi-tasking is a must, attention to detail, accuracy, consistency and job ownership. Ideal candidate must also possess excellent written and oral communication skills. Bachelor's degree and 1-3 years experience required for Juniors and 3-5 years required for Seniors. Qualified candidates, send cover letter + resume and salary requirements in confidence to:

Credential Evaluation And Translation
As the nation's leader in foreign credential evaluations and translations, American Evaluation and Translation Service, Inc. (AETS) provides the most competitive rates in the industry $50 educational evaluations, as well as $200 'expert opinion' work experience and position evaluations completed by PhD university professors who have the "authority to grant college level credit for work experience and/or training." AETS offers a variety of turn-around times, including same-day service for educational, work experience, and position evaluations. For list of rates and times, see: AETS also provides certified translations in 100+ languages, with translators that are specialists in 80+ fields. For a copy of the Application for Credential Evaluation and Translation Services, please contact AETS at (786) 276-8190, visit, or email:


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: Readers interested in learning about featuring your event or conference in Immigration Daily, see here. To feature your newsletter in Immigration Daily, see here.

Submit Your Announcement
If you have a professional announcement such as: New Position, Honors And Awards, Mergers & Acquisitions, New Office Address, New Appointment, New Associate, New Attorney, New Partner, that you wish to share with the Immigration Daily community, send your professional announcement to: comingsNgoings announcements is a free service.


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.

Dear Editor:
To draw an analogy between someone who unknowingly commits a crime because of an oversight and someone who intentionally violates a law, such as an immigration law, borders on the ridiculous (see 07/12/06 ID comment). To compare Rep. Hostettler's alleged stand on immigration enforcement to his obvious and admitted mistake, for which he was fairly punished by a system of laws ignores the fact that all law breakers, including immigration law breakers, should be dealt a fair punishment. Let's keep the personal mudslinging out of ID's editorials. As to ID's suggestion that Rep. Hostettler reflect on "whether undocumented aliens or our nation's broken immigration system is at fault" - I'll be so bold as to answer that one - they share equal blame; the system for creating an intolerable situation over the past 20 years of lax law enforcement and the illegals for capitalizing on it and bringing America to its knees in deference to their blatant lawlessness. Let's create a workable "unskilled worker program" to meet the real needs of American employers, to fill the jobs "Americans won't do", free from political meddling and arbitrary limits like those that are placed on the H-1B/H-2 categories. If an "unskilled worker program" were to become a reality, there could be no more excuse for employers to hire an "illegal alien", or for bleeding hearts to sympathize with lawbreakers who are "simply trying to earn a living to support their families." And after America has a reasonable "unskilled worker" program in place, the great gurus of immigration reform can argue all they want, none of which will solve the problems, but, as the past has proven, will surely add to them. Let's follow the law, but let's make sure the law meets the needs of the times.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
Your editorial entitled "deport Rep. Hostettler" uses an illogical argument (07/12/06 ID). Are you saying that Rep. Hostettler wants or needs mercy like aliens? if so, I do not think you can make that argument successfully. Some crimes require a showing of "intent" to be a violation of the law. Such is the case with carrying a hand gun in an airport. A busy person with a license to carry a hand gun could easily forget about it and carry it into an airport without the "intent" to commit a crime. Rep Hostettler didn't have the intent to break the law. If you use logical steps of reason, you are unable to compare Rep. Hostettler's "mistake" of carrying a gun in an airport with that of an alien overstaying a visa or entering the U.S illegally. Aliens do not overstay visas because they make "mistakes" and if by chance they do, they should depart immediately. The same is true of having entered the U.S illegally. One does not "mistakenly" enter the U.S without inspection and admission. It is difficult to compare this event with Rep Hostettler to the actions of aliens who are here unauthorized. I understand the point you are trying to make, but I felt compelled to point out the use of an illogical argument.

Elaine Morley, Esq.

Dear Editor:
Perhaps our elected representatives should reflect on how the immigration system became broken in the first place? (see 07/12/06 ID comment). If the pre-1980 and pre-1990 immigration laws were still in effect many of the people that are now considered illegal would be legal. There would be more legal avenues for people to come. No one wants to be illegal. If they have a means of being here legally they would take it. Who writes the laws? Who passes the laws? I believe that is Congress. So, Congress created much of the current immigration mess by passing poorly written and poorly thought out legislation in the past, because they were more interested in getting reelected in those years than they were about the future the U.S. So, are we headed for fixing immigration law or is this another case of politics in an election year, passing laws that are basically flawed but have emotional appeal so the representatives can get reelected? If they pass legislation that is enforcement only without consideration for fixing the legal system of immigration, that does nothing to make our country more secure (information/intelligence is needed to prevent terrorist attacks, walls just keep out some job seeking immigrants) or to prevent future problems. Indeed, it will create more problems.

Natalie Fair-Albright

Dear Editor:
What next these anti immigration folks here will complain and ask to their lawmakers to do? What about banning ATM machines, automated check in kiosks in the airports, or maybe automated EZ pass toll collection system in East Coast US highways because they all take high paying Americans' jobs? What about banning e-mails too, because it takes American postmen jobs too? I would like to remind these folks that lazy shameless US citizens are likely to abuse welfare system than illegals. I oppose any kind of giving free handouts for lazy, able bodied people, legal or illegals don't matter. Just look at those hurricane Katrina evacuees who committed frauds and spent the tax money on lavish vacations and Dom Perignon. Deport these crooks if possible (07/12/06 ID comment), and let good, hardworking, tax paying illegal immigrants be US citizens.

Robert Yang

Dear Editor:
Responding to ID's 07/12/06 comment, I made a similar point several months ago in the Bloomington Herald-Times. However, I believe the most crucial point is that our system holds immigrants and employers to higher standards of behavior than our elected officials. That's not an immigration problem; it's a problem with a governmental system that doesn't create enough accountability for elected officials. Maybe we can vote him out, maybe not; he is attractive to his consituents. Felons can't vote. Perhaps, criminals should not be allowed to hold office.

Michael Morrone

Dear Editor:
Just how does ID read that Rep. Hostettler thought it was "OK" to break the law? (07/12/06 ID comment). Whether he did it intentionally or not, he pleaded guilty and paid the prescribed penalty. Sure doesn't sound to me like he thought it's "OK" to break the law. So, by all means, let illegal aliens do the same. Admit that they are breaking the law by being here illegally or working illegally, and observe the prescribed remedy - departure. As for Mr. Algase's letter (07/11/06 ID), I find it interesting that his letter refers to Mr. Tancredo's and Mr. Hayworth's knowledge of "Latino immigration". And here I thought that America's immigration laws were written for the benefit of all Americans, not just Latinos, and that people from all countries should have the opportunity to come here legally - not just those from Latin America. Of course, Mr. Algase's letter is aware that his comparison with the African-American civil rights movement is deeply flawed, first, because illegal aliens no matter where they are from are not entitled to "civil rights" in this country because they are not even legal residents much less citizens, and second, because Latinos are not a race, but an ethnicity. Latin America has also had its own waves of immigration which make it ethnically and racially diverse - not "brown" as those who like to play the race card claim.

Ali Alexander

Dear Editor:
It clearly says (ID Comment 07/12/06) that Rep. John Hostettler immediately apologized for his fault that he did inadvertently. Yet he received a 60-day suspended sentence. The mistake he made is not uncommon, and it may happen to anybody's daily life. So this kind of mistake cannot be compared with the willful mistake that illegal aliens are making in the US. The illegals are intentionally breaking our laws. They know quite well that they are overstaying their visa and it is a crime. As Rep. Hostettler received a sentence for his unintended mistake, the illegal aliens should be sentenced to deportation.

S. Salike

Dear Editor:
Responding to Roger Algase's letter (7/12/06 ID), how can the citing of facts, summary comment on points made and other observations of the record and article of Linda Chavez (7/11/06 ID) possibly be considered an "ad hominem attack" or how would it be possible to specifically respond to all of her points in a short letter to the Editor, within word limits? Paul Donnelly's letter (7/12/06 ID) reaffirmed that Ms. Chavez does not support the enforcement first position, hardly "impeccable conservative credentials" as Mr. Algase's letter maintained. And Rep.'s Tancredo and Hayworth were mentioned as "authorities" on American sovereignty and laws who are also experienced on the illegal invasion. And why doesn't his letter consider the question posed in Miguel Michael D.'s letter (7/11/06 ID) as to whether Latinos are more prone to be sex offenders, to be legitimate. Sociologists delve into such matters regularly. Those who see racism everywhere they look, offend logic, ignore the rule of law, are critical of those who put America first, show favoritism to foreigners and label discussion as an attack are the ones who remain difficult to respect or to take seriously. Regarding Rep. Hostettler (7/12/06 ID comment), your comparison is invalid and shows the favoritism to illegals and the "hard line" against citizens. Had he received a speeding ticket and paid his fine, would ID still try to make a comparison with his position on immigration? He did not deliberately plan to break the law, and he was penalized. Deliberate illegal invaders, who are not citizens, should be as well, the penalty being deportation, not amnesty, bringing them out of the shadows, providing a path to citizenship, given drivers licenses or other benefits or legalizing that which is illegal.

R. L. Ranger

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1999-2006 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim                        ISSN:   1930-062X

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: