Unadjudicated PERM Cases
In this last issue for 2005, we try and take a look ahead at the PERM scene one year from now, i.e. at year-end 2006. We suspect the biggest story at that time will be unadjudicated PERM cases. These cases would be those properly filed, and not denied and/or audited, but just not acted on by DOL for looong periods of time. Perhaps a new term of art will arise "black-hole PERM cases" to describe these vanished and languishing cases. Such cases already exist of course, and their most notable feature, taken in the aggregate, is that there is no pattern discernable as to why a case is held up and another apparently identical one adjudicated. In other words, FIFO (first-in, first-out) is not an operative principle at DOL under PERM, and perhaps DOL does not intend any FIFO to apply to "black-hole" PERM cases. Without predictability and transperency, PERM will not meet the needs of the bar or the employer community, it will lead instead to frustration. However, from DOL's point of view, predictability and transperency of PERM standards will inevitably lead to high percentages of certification for savvy attorneys - a situation DOL appears anxious to avoid. Hence there is apparently a fundamental conflict at the heart of the PERM system, and if our conjecture here is correct, then the PERM system will move from one crisis to another over the course of 2006. Not a happy note to end the year with, but there it is - we call it like we see it.
We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to firstname.lastname@example.org.
ILW.COM is pleased to feature the following distinguished works of
Immigration Monthly: December 2005
This month's Immigration Monthly issue features an article by Cyrus D. Mehta, "Judge Alito On Immigration Law"
BIA May Not Preterminate Without Regulatory Authority
In Yeghiazaryan v. Gonzales, No. 03-72159 (9th Cir. Dec. 14, 2005), the court said that the BIA erred in denying Petitioner's motion to reconsider when it pretermitted the time he had available to file his motion to reopen.
Help Wanted: Immigration Professional
The American Council on International Personnel is seeking a Director of Agency Liaison. Located in Washington, D.C., the Director will be responsible for working with ACIP members and federal immgration agencies to improve immigration policies and procedures for large multinational employers. Duties include maintaining relationships with federal officials and reporting on federal agency activities on an ongoing basis, organizing liaison meetings for members, drafting Federal Register comments, analyzing new policies and procedures and communicating changes to members through weekly email Bulletins and website. Some public speaking and travel required. The ideal candidate has a law degree, detailed knowledge of business immigration laws and procedures, experience filing immigration applications on behalf of large companies, liaison experience, excellent writing skills and ideas for improving the immigration system. Please send resume, cover letter and writing sample to email@example.com. No phone calls please.
Case Management Technology
With INSZoom, you can rest assured that you have the most secure, simple and strategic software and support services available on the market. Our state-of-the art product helps US immigration law firms build efficiency, accuracy and transparency through a single, comprehensive software. We offer 600+ Forms and many advanced features to provide you with an all-in-one case management system solution. Let your clients update their profile information, check their case status, maintain compliance, and generate numerous reports, all via a secure online system. INSZoom's leading edge technology is backed by a friendly, responsive and multi-lingual customer support team. We will configure INSZoom to your workflow for maximium results. INSZoom's technical team works diligently to ensure that the technology works for you - every time! INSZoom is available in 2 versions: Install in your own office or host on INSZoom secure servers. Contact us for a free guided tour today at 925-244-0600 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email: email@example.com.
Submit Your Announcement
If you have a professional announcement such as: New Position, Honors And Awards, Mergers & Acquisitions, New Office Address, New Appointment, New Associate, New Attorney, New Partner, that you wish to share with the Immigration Daily community, send your professional announcement to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: email@example.com (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.
In response to your comment in ID's 12/29/2005 issue, we would ask how long MTRís are taking?
Roy E. Schremp, The Law Office of Dennis M. Clare
In response to your comment in ID's 12/29/2005 issue, I just wanted to let you know about two cases that were returned timely and I have the evidence showing it was, and case got closed claiming did not receive response back in time. I sent the proof to the Department of Labor and followed up with email's but to no avail. Have you heard about anyone else with the same situation?
Name Not Provided
In response to your comment in ID's 12/29/2005 issue, I wrote a note with my objections to a denial, to the Atlanta office,
requesting to have the certifying officer reconsider, but that I did not
want to risk tying the case up for a long time by having an appeal to Balca,
and I got an E mail in a few days. They informed me that they could not
give me any idea of time if the case went to BALCA because they had not
worked out the procedures for BALCA appeals yet and I could not limit an MTR
to reconsideration by the certifying officer. Therefore if I did not wish
to risk a long wait I should withdraw my letter and refile because I would
not be able to refile if the case got sent to BALCA.
In response to your comment in ID's 12/29/2005 issue, we have been told repeatedly by DOL that under the PERM rules there is no mechanism for them to consider MTRís and that it is a waste of time to file them. In fact we have several cases like you describe in your article and were told by DOL that we had to either re-file or appeal to BALCA.
Lynn Susser, Esq., Siskind Susser PC
Editor's Note: Please see Minutes of AILA-DOL Liaison Meeting (11/14/2005) posted on Infonet on 12/2/2005, AILA Doc. No. 05120260 at pages 2, 7, 8 and 9. Besides, we have anecdotal information that attorneys are successfully using Motions to Reconsider with high certification percentages within reasonable but unpredictable time periods.
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1999-2005 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to firstname.lastname@example.org. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.