ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily August 29, 2005
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 15,000+ readers



Immigration Daily ran a letter to the Editor on August 23, 2005 characterizing Mr. Norm Matloff in a manner contrary to our usual editorial standards for the Letters to the Editor section. This was a result of oversight, not intent, on our part, and is the kind of error that we have occasionally made in the past because of our tight deadlines and small staff. Immigration Daily encourages debate and varying viewpoints; however, we have never allowed and do not allow for name calling. The letters to the Editor section is a section for discussing viewpoints, not personalities. Immigration Daily apologizes to Mr. Matloff for our error in oversight, and the characterization has been modified.

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


Missed ILW.COM Seminars? Get Tapes! (Listen To Sample Audio Clips)

You can listen to cutting edge issues in immigration at a schedule convenient to you. Tapes for all our seminars are only $199 per series. Featured experts include Tammy Fox-Isicoff, Ron Klasko, Cynthia Lange, Angelo Paparelli, Jan Pederson, Joel Stewart, Bernard Wolfsdorf and many others. For more info on detailed curricula, speaker bios and sample audio clips of our seminars, please see here.


Immigration Monthly: August 2005
The August 2005 issue of Immigration Monthly features an article by Gary Endelman, "Keepin' Em Down On The Farm: The Visa Trading Bank And Rural Depopulation".


Summary Judgment Awarded Where USCIS Fails To Issue Evidence Of LPR Status In Class Action Suit
In Santillan v. Gonzales, No. C 04-2686 (USDC N. Dist. California, Aug. 24, 2005), the court granted summary judgment to a nationwide class action on behalf of legal permanent residents denied their green cards (courtesy of Martin R. Acevedo, Associate Director, Texas Lawyers' Committee).


Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Kapoor & Associates seeks paralegal/legal assistant for busy family- and employment-based immigration law firm located in Midtown Atlanta, GA; Duties include a little of everything, including preparation of immigration documents, case mgmt, and client liaison; Excellent opportunity to learn, grow and advance with expanding practice; Must have a college degree, and prefer someone with immigration experience; Must have excellent computer skills; Multi-linguals preferred. Competitive salary/benefits. Send resume with salary history to Romy Kapoor by e-mail:

Help Wanted: Immigration Professional
AIESEC is the world's premier international youth organization dedicated to increasing cultural understanding and cooperation through running an international work exchange program. AIESEC has an immediate opening for a visa program manager position based in New York City. The visa program manager is in charge of all aspects of Aiesec's Exchange Visitor Program (EVP+). The EVP+ program rapidly provides immigration attorneys and corporations with a fast, high quality J-1 sponsorship alternative, and is a key strategy helping to fuel the growth of our organization. He/she works with more than one hundred immigration attorneys and company HR representatives to sponsor individuals on the J-1 training visa. The manager reviews and sponsors hundreds of individual applications on J-1 training programs. start date: ASAP. Skills and Experience: customer relationship management skills and experience; must be a motivated self-starter, with excellent follow-through skills, who can work independently; exceptional communication, organization, and analytical abilities; legal or immigration industry background, experience and knowledge a plus. If interested, please send a resume and cover letter to Jim Kelly: No phone calls, please.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Growing central New Jersey Law firm seeks aggressive, motivated, take-charge attorney for its immigration group. Successful candidate should have experience with deportation/removal cases and be familiar with business immigration, including H-1's and PERM. Must be able to work independently. Some clientele of your own is a plus but not required. Competitive salary and benefit package to right person. Apply in confidence by email to:

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy (FDBL) seeks to hire an experienced paralegal for its Washington D.C. office. FDBL offers a career position requiring a wide range of skills in a fast-paced setting for the right candidate. Our ideal candidate has 3-5 years experience with all aspects of business immigration and will have the benefit of attorney supervision and guidance. Responsibilities include: preparation of all types of immigrant visa petitions, labor certifications, adjustment of status and consular processing applications, and preparation of all types of nonimmigrant visa petitions (particularly Hs, Ls, TNs, and Os). Paralegal will manage caseload with large degree of independence, communicate with clients regarding procedural and case processing issues, update and maintain client status reports, prepare bills, and serve as a team resource. FDBL offers a comprehensive compensation package. Fax your resume and cover letter to Allison Bettridge, Human Resources/Office Manager, at 202-371-2898. For more information, please contact Ms. Bettridge at 202-223-5515. EOE.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Established immigration and real-estate boutique firm in Aventura, FL is looking for an immigration attorney. Must have minimum 2 yrs. business immigration experience including H, L, E visas, I-140's, labor certifications (PERM), RFEs. Bilingual (English-Spanish) is a must. Compensation commensurate with experience. Generous benefit package. EOE. Please send resume to Mark Katsman: No calls please.

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
The Law Offices of Jessica Dominguez, a rapidly growing firm based in Sherman Oaks, CA, has immediate opportunity for an immigration attorney to join its team of two attorneys and staff. Position offers the opportunity to work on a wide range of cases. Attorney will represent clients before immigration officers and in immigration courts. Excellent legal research/writing and outstanding communication skills needed. Ideal candidate has 2 years of experience-exceptional, motivated candidates with less experience are also encouraged to apply. Candidate shows initiative and works independently. Must speak Spanish. Send cover letter, and resume to Roxana Muro: All replies will be treated in the strictest confidence and references will not be contacted without prior approval.

Case Management Technology
With Immigration Case Management Tools from INSZoom, you can rest assured that you are working with the most secure, simple and strategic software and support services. This state-of-the art product helps US Immigration Law Firms to build efficiency, accuracy and transparency in their immigration operations through a single comprehensive software. Besides 600+ Forms and Case Management, many advanced functionalities like Online Questionnaires, eFiling, eTracking, Knowledgebase, Group Calendaring, Accounting, Prospect Management, Document Expiration Ticklers & Management Reports, etc. are part of this one all-encompassing tool. Your clients may update their profile information, check case status, manage compliancy, and generate numerous reports..all via a secure online system. INSZoom's superior technology is backed by a friendly, responsive and multi-lingual training & customer support team; which will modulate the training program and handhold your team members to maximize the benefits from INSZoom. We will ensure that our technology works for you…everytime. INSZoom is available in 2 versions: Install in your own office or host on INSZoom secure servers. Contact us for a free guided tour today at 925-244-0600 or


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email:

Send Your Announcement
You can announce professional news concerning your firm for free in the ComingsNGoings section in Immigration Daily. Share your news with over 16,000 subscribers! Send to:


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred). Many letters to the Editor refer to past correspondence, available in our archives.

Dear Editor:
In response to Immigration Daily's Foot in Mouth comment (8/26/05 ID), it is important however, in analysing the DOL's revocation authority, to recall that the comments to the final regulations implementing the PERM system stated the following about the DOL's authority to revoke an approved labor certification on the grounds it was "not justified": " (t)his change in the final rule will allow the CO to revoke a labor certification for any ground that would have resulted in a denial of the Application for Permanent Employment Certification, whether unintentional or willful." If, as I believe, there is no authority in the statute or regulations for the denial of a labor certification merely because the same employer has successfully filed a labor certification for the same employee for a different job opportunity, then the DOL's revocation authority does not provide it with the authority to revoke a second labor certification approved upon that employee's behalf merely because it believes that the second certification was "not justified". Rather, at least according to the quoted comments, the DOL would have to demonstrate that a basis must have existed for denying this second labor certification in the first place in order for revocation to be approved. Of course, comments to the regulations are not necessarily binding upon an administrative agency, and it is certainly far from impossible that the DOL may attempt to stretch its "not justified" revocation authority into a general catch all provision akin to a denial on grounds of discretion. If it does however, practioners seeking judicial review of such revocations should be quick to point out to the courts that such a use, or rather, abuse, of the DOL's revocation authority goes well beyond the explanation provided for it in the comments published in the Federal Register.

Michael E. Piston, Esq.

Dear Editor:
Distortion of facts and rabble rousing rhetoric will not solve America's immigration problems, nor will they enhance the economy or border security. Ali Alexander's redundant tirade against H-1B visas is again brought to light (08/26/05 ID). Once again, he blasts H-1B employers with outrageous and unsupported claims. H-1B's distort the market? Lower wages? Make these "professions less appealing to Americans"? I'd like to know from whence comes Mr. Alexander's distorted and unsupported point of view? Does he not know that US employers offering jobs to foreign workers must pay the prevailing wage, as determined by the DOL? And what is the basis for the bold claim that, ". . . our graduate schools are similarly weighted to favor the admission of foreign students who hope for a green card, will tolerate low wages and conditions that Americans wouldn't, and thus allow universities to keep research costs and wages for academics down." I, for one, am growing weary of these bald-faced distortions, and feel they only serve to hinder the discussion of the resolution of our country's immigration problems.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
I am in favor of lots of immigration, legal only. What do they, and Immigration Daily, not understand about illegal aliens? Immigration Daily loves the troubled system as it is because it is your bread + butter. Any change to current broken immigration laws should penalize countries in proportion to their contribution of illegal entrants. I have relatives from south of the border and they all agree. (2) Immigration Daily's recent report about the felon, paroled after 12 of a 30 year sentence for child molesting sounded almost sympathetic. He should have been physically deported on the day of his release. A voucher system could be used to pay his home country to monitor his parole. (3) The 14th Constitutional Amendment has been very badly abused to allow anybody born on U.S. soil to be declared a U.S. citizen.

Peter Griswold

Dear Editor:
Immigration Daily's comment (8/26/05 ID) seem to be suggesting that this situation is a reason for looser immigration laws, including a guest worker program. To me, it suggests the contrary, that illegal aliens and their pro-illegal immigration allies, such as the Bar, are attempting to intimidate Americans from defending their own property against trespassing. It's a graphic illustration of the dispossession of Americans by illegal aliens. It's also worth noting that the "vigilante" involved was not convicted of any criminal act, but lost the property by default, presumably because he was unable to hire defense, in a civil action. Perhaps we "anti-immigrationists" should take a page out of SPLC's book and file more civil actions against illegal aliens and their supporters. More RICO suits, too, against employers, and organizations such as banks, that profit from illegal immigration. I also can't help but wonder...SPLC spokesman Morris Dees says that the ranch will eventually be sold. It was purchased for about $120,000. What's Mr. Dees' cut going to be, assuming that they can even find a buyer, given the border problems there? I rather doubt that the new "owners" will be able to afford to run the place or pay taxes on it, even if they had legal status to remain. Finally, has Immigration Daily reported on the Pew Hispanic Center's survey of Mexicans which shows that almost half want to immigrate to the U.S., and around 20 percent would do it illegally? And that's just Mexico. Just how would a "guest worker" program stop or even greatly reduce illegal immigration when that many Mexicans of all socio-economic levels are that disillusioned with conditions in their country, not to mention the millions of would-be immigrants from countries such as India and Pakistan or the rest of Latin America?

Ali Alexander

Dear Editor:
In response to Ali Alexander's letter (8/26/05 ID), (1) H1-b workers are brought in isn't not because of a shortage in the American workforce, but a shortage of qualified labor, specifically for American scientific, quantitative and research positions. I strongly recommend Geoff Colvin's article in Fortune magazine on this point. American education isn't producing sufficient numbers of such workers. This is why "No child left behind" are being proposed. It will take 15 years until a new system produces enough scientists and engineers to feed demand, and in that time the American economy has a good chance of being left behind. This is why "the future of the U.S. lies in the immigration of professionals from overseas", or in outsourcing work in order just to get it done (2) Mr. Alexander's letter is correct in stating that government policies "discourage Americans from entering these professions", but not by favoring immigrants, but by keeping them tied to one employer, and thus unwittingly driving wages down (3) thankfully, H1-b workers will no longer "tolerate low wages and conditions that Americans wouldn't" (4) in response to the ludicrous statement in Mr. Alexander's letter regarding universities "favoring" immigrants, walk into the Math or Physics department of any US university, and ask them the percentage of applications received from USCs. When I was admitted my university's Math dept, I walked in one week before the quarter was to begin, and there were three unused scholarships. No USCs had applied for a graduate degree in Math (5) in reply to his question, my firm which employs 2000 people in its NY office sponsors only 3 H1-b visas and permanent residencies combined. I was hired after 27 USC candidates were interviewed, none qualified. Mr Alexander's letter reeks of the defeatist and sour grapes attitude that Mr. Colvin's article articulately describes.

Name Not Supplied

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1999-2005 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim