ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily June 10, 2005
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 15,000+ readers


Nigerian Scams

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) website, Nigerian advance-fee fraud has been around for decades, but now seems to have reached epidemic proportions. The perpetrators of advance fee fraud, known internationally as "4-1-9" fraud after the section of the Nigerian penal code which addresses fraud schemes, are often very creative and innovative. FTC reports that they are receiving dozens of offers a day from supposed Nigerians politely promising big profits in exchange for help moving large sums of money out of their country. Immigration Daily has learned that members of its Yellow Page listings service have also been receiving Nigerian scams via email. These emails were not sent by ILW.COM. We remind you that these advance-fee solicitations are not legitimate queries for immigration help and are scams. More information about Nigerian Advance-Fee Loan scams is available from the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Department of State.

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


Steven A. Clark, Tammy Fox-Isicoff, Allen Kaye, Edward Litwin, George S. Newman, William A. Stock

The speakers for our current telephonic seminar on PERM are Steven A. Clark, Tammy Fox-Isicoff, Allen Kaye, Edward Litwin, George S. Newman, and William A. Stock. The discussion will be led by H. Ronald Klasko. The deadline to sign up for the next phone session is Tuesday, June 14th. For more info, including speaker bios, detailed curriculum, and registration information, please see: (Fax version:


Legalization - Should It Return?
Kevin Dixler writes "So the ultimate question is, "what do we do with the millions of foreigners living in our cities and suburbs?"


EOIR Releases Latest Disciplinary Actions
The Executive Office for Immigration Review released its latest disciplinary actions: 3 attorneys were immediately suspended; 5 received final orders.


Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Based in the heart of Lower Manhattan's business district, the Law Office of Keshab Raj Seadie, P.C. form strategic partnerships with corporate clients providing outstanding counsel in the areas of complex H-1B visa matters, PERM based permanent residency cases, as well as investor, intracompany transferee, extraordinary ability and national interest waiver petitions. Clients range from small to medium sized companies, as well as individuals, and the firm offers counsel in English, Japanese, Hindi, Gujarati, Nepali, and Croatian. We are currently searching for a business immigration paralegal, with responsibilities including preparation of: business immigration visa petitions, labor certification applications and permanent residency applications. This position will also handle daily tasks associated with the practice. Candidates must clearly understand immigration process; must be detail oriented and have excellent writing skills. Candidates must be able to work well in a document intensive environment. 2+ years minimum employment-based immigration experience and bachelor's degree required. Paralegal certificate preferred. We are an equal opportunity employer. Send resume to Seadie Keshab to:

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
The Law Offices of Ron Katiraei, an expanding immigration law firm with a focus on employment based visas, is accepting applications for a paralegal with minimum of 5 years experience in handling and preparation of employment-based visa-petitions such as L-1, H-1B, O-1, E-1-2, TN and other corporate-employment based visas. Full-time position is based in Jackson Heights, NY. We require excellent interpersonal and writing skills as well as good knowledge of computer and case management system. Send your resume, cover letter + salary requirements in confidence to:

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Alcala Law Firm, PC a small international law firm in Salt Lake City, is seeking an experienced immigration paralegal to work directly with two immigration attorneys. Candidate must have at least five years of paralegal experience in immigration matters. Candidate must possess strong organizational, research, computer skills, and writing skills. Applicant must be fluent in English and Spanish, both spoken and written. An undergraduate degree is required. We offer an excellent compensation and benefits package, outstanding work environment, and comprehensive support to enable our paralegal to assume significant responsibility, including contact with clients. Collegial, open office with a professional family atmosphere. Please cover letter and resume to:

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Jasinsky Immigration Law LLC seeks an experienced business immigration attorney for our Stamford, Connecticut office. Send cover letter and resume to Laura Jasinsky,

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Jasinsky Immigration Law LLC seeks an experienced business immigration paralegal for our Stamford, Connecticut office. Send cover letter and resume to Laura Jasinsky,

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law is a Los Angeles non-profit focusing its work on the civil and human rights of insular minorities. The Center initiates and conducts major class action litigation. The program also operates community-based and international human rights projects. The Center currently has an opening for a Staff Attorney. The Staff Attorney will assist in development and implementation of a training program on the rights of abused immigrant women and children, as well as provide technical support and assistance to Pro Bono attorneys representing abused immigrant women and children minors. The Staff Attorney will also represent abused women and children in Special Immigrant Juvenile, Asylum, VAWA, U-Visa, and T-Visa proceedings. Qualifications: Applicants must be admitted to CA Bar; must have experience with preparing one of the following: (SIJ petitions, VAWA petitions, or U-Visa applications); must be bilingual in Spanish and English; must have strong research and writing skills; should have demonstrated commitment to social justice issues. Compensation: $40,000 plus benefits. Do not telephone. Send resume, cover letter, 3 references, and writing sample in Word format (no WP docs) to both Angela Perry: and Peter Schey:

Labor Certification Advertising/Recruiting
Adnet Advertising Agency Inc. has provided labor certification advertising services to immigration attorneys since 1992. Adnet helps attorneys find appropriate places to run labor cert ads, places the ads, obtains the tearsheets, and offers a variety of billing options. Attorneys can manage the entire ad process through Adnet's secure web-based Ad-managment system. Most of Adnet's services are free since we receive a commission from the newspapers and journals where the ad is placed. Adnet services large international law firms as well as solo practice attorneys. Call us at 212-587-3164, visit, or email us at Contact us today to find out why we are the ad agency of choice for immigration attorneys since 1992.


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or fewer at no charge), email:

New Offfices
The law offices of Kathleen Lord Black, located in San Francisco, California, is pleased to announce the opening of an office in Santa Cruz, CA. Services offered include family immigration, business immigration, deportation defense, BIA and 9th Circuit Appeals, and post-conviction relief. Tel: (831) 332-7515.


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred).

Dear Editor:
I would have a much easier time trusting the government to "do the right thing" about immigration reform if I didn't know that this same government can also choose to "look the other way" when it suits its purpose. I have experienced this firsthand. I was once hired by a private contractor to plant trees in a national forest. I met the contractor at a USDA Forest Service office, and climbed into the back of a truck filled mostly with Mexican nationals. I learned that these men were all in the US without proper documentation, many moving from one seasonal employment to another, frequently with government contractors. I have little doubt that the Forest Service officials were bright enough to scope out the situation as well as I could then in my relative youth. Today I hear reports of a fellow with dual Canadian-U.S. citizenship who attempted to enter the US with weapons in his possession. Because there were no outstanding warrants, our Border Patrol folks confiscated the weapons, but allowed him to enter the US. Doesn't speak very well for our "unfettered right to control our borders and entry using and under our own terms..." making the U.S. very "prudent, safe and sovereign" to me. [RL Ranger, 06/09/05]. I suspect that strict Protectionist tactics will ultimately fail to curb "illegal immigration", just as Prohibition failed to curb drinking. I believe we are already a global society, and we should make any reforms to our laws with that in mind. I would hope the reality of our government's actions in the immigration realm will match its rhetoric in the future, rather than the "do what I say, not what I do" mentality. Benjamin Franklin said it best, "What you appear to be, be really." One can always hope.

Karmell Bowen

Dear Editor:
While I agree with some of the more obvious comments in R. L. Ranger's letter of 6/9/05, (Illegal entry is not the same as immigrating any more than bank-robbing is the same as banking when making a lawful withdrawal...), it is foolish to deny that illegal labor has been both "benign" as well as the cause of "current chaos": contradictions can and do exist in most situations, and by simply denying reality it does not cease to exist. It is presumptuous to state that most Americans want a reduction of both illegal as well legal entry: just ask those employers who are providing work to both these groups, and indeed going to great expense and effort to sponsor the legal immigrants. As a matter of fact, this demand from employers is precisely because of the lack of knowledgable and educated Americans in the labor force. It may well be that the US will be forced to accept this to stay competitive, and to uphold the economic power that has in fact been a product of much immigrant (illegal or otherwise) contribution throughout its history. Finally, what is truly "preposterous" is using the analogy of immigrant labor to a party. RL Ranger's letter reflects a failure to realize that most immigrants - again both legal as well as illegal - work very hard in the US, and almost always at lower wages than a US citizen. Legal immigrants pay taxes, Mediare, Medicaid and Social Security which support US citizens such as R.L. Ranger and his/her family, none of which they have legal rights to as non-citizens. "There is no universal right of foreigners to come to US." But isn't that how most Americans' ancestors arrived here in the frst place?


Dear Editor:
Regarding the "Anti-Border Folks" comment (6/8/05 ID), it seems odd that immigration attorneys would accuse those of use who believe in Rule of Law of being biased against immigrants, particularly of people who have entered and continue to enter this country unlawfully. I'm not anti-border or anti-immigration. However, I believe that orderly immigration is necessary to perpetuate the founding fathers intentions - after all, this country was founded by immigrants who came here seeking, among other things, religious freedom. We can't just close the borders. Do you also believe that we need to rescind the law against murder? I think murder is wrong. I guess that makes me anti-murder. Entering this country without following the rules is illegal, thus wrong. However, your statement that "The anti-border policy by contrast would be to make large-scale cross-border movement lawfully impossible..." implies that large-scale cross-border movement is currently legal and that we want it made illegal. Please excuse my ignorance, but I thought that large-scale movement of aliens who have not applied for entry through the currently lawful methods was already illegal. If Immigration Daily wants to make a comment about an issue, why not approach it in a more positive way, such as "Immigration Daily believes that we need to have in this country an open and frank discussion about how to fix the current immigration laws", rather than accuse those who only want the current laws enforced of being biased. I don't understand the point of your comment, other than it is very inflammatory. I understand that immigration lawyers stand to gain millions of new clients once legislation such as the McCain-Kennedy "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" (S.B. 1033) bill becomes law. You have to follow the money.

Steve Landess
Austin, Texas

Dear Editor:
Contrary to what my friend and colleague Angelo Paparelli suggests (6/07/05 ID), I do not purport to hold back the ocean, but instead surf the waves of newly developing ethics issues. I agree with Angelo's letter, outsourcing to countries like India and China will be inevitable for international business. But for lawyers, outsourcing legal support services raises ethical issues that may violate the California Rules of Professional Conduct (CRPC), such as conflicts of interest (CRPC 3-300 and 3-310), fee sharing with a non-lawyer (CRPC 1-320), and client confidentiality (California B&P Code 6068(e)), as well as considerations of privacy and internet security. My concern is that attorney-client privileged confidential information, like birth information, social security numbers, parents' names, etc., might be subject to identity theft, and confidential information about companies, like their gross and net revenues, number of employees, etc., would be shared with third parties who could sell that information. I don't trust providing confidential and personal identity information to people in countries that traditionally do not honor confidentiality, privacy, copyrights, trademarks, etc. Even if the fine print of an attorney/client fee agreement contained language informing a client their confidential and personal information would be shared with third parties overseas, I wonder if the State Bar Ethics Committee would find that a disclaimer satisfactory to the attorney would sufficiently put the client on notice that their attorney/client confidentiality and personal information privacy is now down the toilet, and is in the hands of third parties in countries that may not adhere to basic ethical standards. Therefore, I continue to wonder if the outsourcing of legal support services is ethical, even with the permission of the client.

David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA

Dear Editor:
US immigration history is not always about native people putting red carpet to the immigrants but also full of shameful stories about land grabbing, annexation, genocide of the native people and their lawful properties, human rights abuses, unfair discrimination and racism to other immigrants just because they were considered as "undesireable" and different than earlier immigrants and obviously to prevent competition. The purpose of all immigration and trade barriers laws nothing but to prevent competition and unfairly limit others to pursue the same chance to market their skills and products on the level playing field, prosper, survive, seek liberty and opportunities. Chinese Exclusion act, anti Jewish refugees act to prevent them escaping holocaust, slavery, discrimination and denial on African Americans' civil rights are just few examples. Why not giving everybody chance to pursue liberty, happiness, prosperity and opportunities here while shutting down the welfare system that unfairly gives free handouts for lazy people including US citizens themselves at the expense of hardworking tax payers ? Those illegals who are looking for "free" healthcare, education and any social services should go back their countries and US citizens who have the same mentality should ask Santa Claus, We must tell everybody there's no such a "free" lunch. And those who prefer "Berlin wall" and protectionism on our immigration and trade policies, please look back at our history. A shame is forever a shame. It's 21st century and you can't rely on goverments to protect your job security by being your personal nannies. Empower yourselves or you'll lose the competition. Sorry, it's life and the reality from now and forward.

Richard Sugiharto

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Copyright 1999-2005 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM. Send correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. The views expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily represent the views of ILW.COM or members of the Immigration Daily Advisory Board. The opinions expressed in the Comment section are those of ILW.COM and Immigration Daily and do not necessarily represent the views of the members of the Immigration Daily Advisory Board.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim

Advisory Board:   Marc Ellis, Gary Endelman