ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage


Immigration Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily February 28, 2005
Previous Issues
The unmatched news resource for legal professionals. Free! Join 15,000+ readers


Steve Clark, Josie Gonzalez, Ed Litwin

Steve Clark, Josie Gonzalez and Ed Litwin will be on the PERM panel of "Running With The Bulls In Immigration Pamplona" on Thursday, March 3rd. The discussion will be devoted exclusively to PERM issues and will be led by Angelo Paparelli. The deadline to register is Tuesday, March 1st. For more info, please see: (Fax version:

We welcome readers to share their opinion and ideas with us by writing to


Telephonic PERM Session - Deadline Is Tuesday, March 1st

The March 3rd session of "Running With The Bulls In Immigration Pamplona" will be devoted to PERM issues. The discussion will be led by noted immigration practitioner Angelo Paparelli. A detailed agenda will be posted soon. The deadline to register is Tuesday, March 1st. For more info, please see: (Fax version:


H-2B Short-Term Workers: Essential For US Employers' Survival
Brendan Flanagan, John Meredith, et. al of the H-2B Workforce Coalition write "Despite best efforts to recruit US workers, small businesses need H-2B workers to fill seasonal vacancies."

Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here:


GAO Report Concludes Many Challenges Remain For US-VISIT
The Government Accounting Office released a report concluding that some progress has been made, but many challenges remain on US VISIT Program.

Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info:


Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Moore & Van Allen, a general business and litigation firm with 240 lawyers in three offices, is one of the largest firms in North Carolina. We have an opportunity for a qualified individual to join our Charlotte office as an entry-level immigration paralegal. Full-time entry level paralegal position requires 1-2 years corporate immigration experience, excellent technical skills and attention to detail. Successful candidate will be integrated into a large corporate immigration team. Overtime required as needed. We offer a competitive salary and excellent employee benefits. Send resume in confidence to Candy Komornik at: or by fax: (704) 339-5906.

Offshore Legal Services
We assist immigration attorneys in NIV and IVs, including checklists, form completion, draft cover & employer letters, consular processing assistance, follow-up/correspondence with clients and other related services. We offer a full range of services including document generation, research, accounts, clerical & archival. Quantum Technologies is a sister company to Adnet Advertising Agency, the leader in immigration advertising services for over a decade. Headquartered in New York City, Quantum provides the highest quality services to law firms. Law firms can cost effectively and securely outsource legal processes, and focus on increasing earning, growth and servicing their clients. We work as your partner offering tailored services that accelerate product delivery. With state-of-the-art communication facilities and infrastructure, our legal offsite center functions as virtual extensions of your offices providing 24 x 7 support and significant cost savings. Convenient billing options available. For more info. contact Roshni Khattar at 212-406-3503 ext. 242 or

Help Wanted: Immigration Attorney
Reeves and Associates, one of the largest, oldest and most respected immigration firms in California seeks highly motivated and hard-working immigration attorney admitted to the CA bar with 5+ years immigration experience for its Pasadena, CA office. Ideal candidate should have extensive experience in immigration law (family, business, immigrant and nonimmigrant visas, and deportation/removal), exceptional writing and editorial ability, case management skills and ability to supervise and coach support staff. Applicant needs to be detail oriented, highly organized, have people and case management skills, exceptional client service approach and be able to multi-task and manage a challenging and varied workload. R&A has an experienced support staff, state of the art technology and unsurpassed growth and learning potential, all in a very congenial environment. Submit resume with cover letter + salary history to Robert Reeves: or fax to (626) 795-4999.

Help Wanted: Immigration Paralegal
Established boutique law firm in New York City seeks an experienced paralegal who desires to work from home, part-time. We specialize in O-1 and EB-1A in the arts and entertainment, with a selection of H-1, L-1 and family cases. The ideal candidate will: 1) have experience in our practice area, 2) have an interest and talent for organizing, excerpting and summarizing evidence in a lengthy submission letter (for O-1 and EB-1 cases), 3) be self-motivating, and will 4) work efficiently, timely and in an organized fashion. We communicate via emails and couriers. The candidate will augment our current team of telecommuting paralegals. We project 5-15 cases per month. The candidate must have necessary computer equipment, software and skills for this position. We pay by the hour or per case. Please forward detailed resume, writing sample for EB-1A case, and two references to:

Consular Processing Services
Embassy Connection, LLC, a US based firm with a global network of in-country professionals is available to assist with NIV and IV processing worldwide. We schedule interview appointments, pay visa application fees, communicate any changes of local policies, help gather country-specific supporting documents, and provide on-the-ground comprehensive support in virtually every country. We offer simple fee structure and flexible billing options. Visit or call 1-888-476-2195 to learn more.

We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here

For services/products of use in your law practice please click here


Readers are welcome to share their comments, email: (300-words or fewer preferred).

Dear Editor:
Any benefits attached to the REAL ID Act (2/25/05 ID comment) could hardly make up for the impossible burdens it creates for asylum seekers. For example, Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2004) is a case that would turn out differently under the proposed "central motive" requirement. Reina Garcia-Martinez grew up in a Guatemalan village during that country's brutal civil war. The guerrillas forcibly conscripted young men from the village, including Reina's brother. The government retaliated for this perceived support of the guerrillas. At 19, soldiers invaded her home, beat her father, forced her mother to cook for them, and gang-raped Reina. She fled to the US and applied for asylum. The IJ denied Reina's application, considering the rape a mere criminal act, not as part of a systematic campaign of persecuting villagers for perceived guerrilla sympathies. The BIA rubber-stamped the decision, but the Ninth Circuit reversed. One of President Bush's most conservative new judges chastised the IJ for not recognizing that persecutors may have multiple motives and that only one need be a recognized ground for asylum. The timing and intensity of the atrocities by the military, following the forced recruitment guerilla campaign, established that the soldiers intended to punish villagers for their perceived political opinion. Carnal or criminal desires did not erase that political motivation. Enactment of the REAL ID Act would change this reversal into an affirmance because it would require that the applicant prove the persecutor's "central motive". There's no way that Reina could meet this standard unless the soldiers provided an affidavit stating that they raped her primarily as part of a campaign to discourage support of the guerrillas and that their carnal desires were only a secondary motivation. A reviewing court restrained by a deferential standard of review could not reverse.

Scott Mossman

Dear Editor:
We already have "national IDs", namely driver's licenses and social security numbers (see 2/25/05 ID). The fact that a particular state may issue it doesn't change the fact that the driver's license from one state is now in use for everything from driving to cashing a check to ID for boarding aircraft or entering federal buildings in pretty much all 50 states. In fact, when I lived in Michigan many years ago, I was able to cross between Detroit and Ontario, Canada, only showing my Michigan driver's license. When I go home to Michigan now and show my out-of-state driver's license for paying by check, I often have to show the clerk where the license number is, which doesn't give me much faith that the clerk would know an invalid license if she saw one. My social security number has been used over the years for everything from employment (its original intended use) to college ID number to ID for medical care and obtaining credit. Given the epidemic of identity theft under our current "system" and the prevalence of unregulated commercial databases on us, I fail to see how standardizing the criteria for issuing identification can do anything but make it easier to identify fraudsters of all stripes and more difficult for them to engage in ID fraud in the first place.

Ali Alexander

Dear Editor:
Immigration Daily has no comprehension of the evils of the Real ID bill (see 2/25/05 ID comment). To even suggest that this measure may be of value because it opens the conversation to "benefit" reform is to engage in a trade-off of one class of persons, e.g. asylum seekers for another, i.e. those worthy of guest worker relief. When I read the ID bill, I concluded that FAIR drafted many of its provisions because section after section closed hard fought victories on credibility, nexus between persecution and reasonable fear, necessity of documentation. In addition, the ID bill essentially eliminates habeas corpus relief. To me, the loss of the Great Writ to aliens and judicial review seriously outweighs all benefits that might be gained from a guest worker bill. If we allow loss of judicial review in the immigration practice, we stand naked before the onslaught to come. There is no blessing in the ID bill. It must be fought with all our might.

Vard Johnson

Dear Editor:
The argument made by S. Salike (2/25/05 ID), makes sense, except for the fact that universities also fall under the immigration law cycle. What I mean by this is that after 9/11, requirements for visas have become very strict. This is good for security (or at least that's what they say) but it is not good for universities. Most of the foreign students actually pay their tuition in cash and on last years statistics on Time Magazine, I remember reading that foreign students enrollment fell by about 30% in the US as compared to pre-9/11 enrollment. This of course is a loss in revenue for universities, mainly private universities. But in addition, the article mentioned how enrollment in European universities rose by 20%. What this means is that we are keeping some of the brightest people in the world out of the US and letting other nations take them and use them for their advantage. Dont be surprised when some nations of the EC start having better technology, better scientists, etc. There has to be a different method that just making it harder for these students to come. We have to use the system not only to defend our nation, but also to our advantage in concentrating the best students in the world.

G. Hernandez

Dear Editor:
Lrnesheim's letter (2/25/05 ID) indicates that she knows of "no one who wants to give amnesty to illegal immigrants" and assuming she considers the Bush guest worker proposal an "amnesty" then perhaps she should have attended the 32nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington last week. According to a February 22, 2005 FOX News story "A straw poll conducted throughout the conference found that 54 percent disagreed with guest worker visas." Only 54%? The restrictionists have been infiltrating the conservative movement since the late Richard Estrada spoke at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990's urging conservatives to change their position on immigration. Despite packing the conference, despite booing and hissing "Manhattan Institute analyst Tamar Jacoby's defense of the guest-worker proposal" (The Washington Times, February 21, 2005), the restrictionists could only muster 54% against the Bush proposal. There is now definitely hope for success of the Bush proposal.

Eugene J. Flynn


Readers can share their professional announcements (100-words or less at no charge), email:

Submit Your Announcement
comingsNgoings was launched last year. So far, we have received announcements for the following: New Position, Honors And Awards, Mergers & Acquisitions, New Office Address, New Appointment, New Associate, New Attorney, New Partner. If you have a professional announcement (not limited to the above), that you wish to share with the Immigration Daily community, send your professional announcement to: comingsNgoings announcements is a free service.

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.

Publisher:  Sam Udani    Legal Editor:  Michele Kim

Editorial Advisory Board:   Marc Ellis, Gary Endelman

© Copyright 1999-2005 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM