Ashcroft Says Mass Migration Is National Security Threat
In a stunning administrative decision (In re D-J-, 23 I&N Dec. 572 (AG
2003) (Apr. 17, 2003)), Attorney General Ashcroft ordered the detention
without bond of Haitian asylum seekers. In his administrative decision, he
alleges that national security concerns underlie his decision: "The INS
submissions also outline [a] national security implication of encouraging
future mass migrations by sea from Haiti. The Coast Guard declaration
asserts that continued mass migrations from Haiti have 'heavily taxed Coast
Guard capacity and capabilities,' while 'reducing responsiveness in other
mission areas.' ... The Department of Defense, which is also involved in
efforts to contain such overseas migrations, also asserts that the demands
of mass migrations from Haiti 'would create a drain on scarce assets that
are being used in or supporting operations elsewhere.' " This can be
interpreted as a strong basis for having a channel for large-scale legal
migration from Haiti, instead of wasting scarce Defense Dept resources
chasing potential dish-washers and gardeners. National Security is
endangered only by *illegal* mass migration, a direct result of the lack of
available legal avenues. *Legal* mass migration is not a national security
threat, yet the Attorney General's Decision implies that it is: "The first
area of a national security concern advanced by INS is the threat of further
mass migration." This is an anti-immigration agenda hiding behind the
figleaf of national security.
The decision also says "the State Department declaration asserts that it
has 'noticed an increase in third country nations (Pakistanis,
Palestinians, etc.) using Haiti as a staging point for attempted migration
to the United States. This increases the national security interest in
curbing use of this migration route.'" We agree entirely that such third
country stagings raise national security issues. This points out once again
the need to have legal channels of mass migration, where the migrants can
and should be thoroughly vetted for national security concerns. It is the
lack of such legal channels that make third country stagings happen.
So, what's next? We believe that this decision sets the stage for three
consequences, whether intended or otherwise. Firstly, this decision is
likely a precursor to a similar decision for Mexican nationals. The
argument, mutatis mutandis, will be much the same. Secondly, since the
Attorney General wants to detain hundreds of gardeners in the fear that
their could be one Al-Qaeda operative in their midst, in other words,
detain the chaff with the wheat, our detention centers will soon be bulging
with an awful lot of dish-washers and gardeners. It is a fantasy to believe
that detention will change the fundamentals of why people seek to migrate
hither. Thirdly, this decision will put additional pressure on Congress to
open up legal channels of immigration. The very next economic upturn will see strong pressure by American employers on Congress for a reliable and legal method for employing immigrants. This decision gives solid,
national security grounds for Congress to make large-scale legal
INA And INS Regulations At Your Fingertips
While writing to the INS about a RFE or preparing a petition, how do you
keep the INA and all the relevent regulations of the INS at your fingertips?
Attorneys have been using the exaustive topic indices in the 8 CFR Plus and
The Whole ACT - INA (Annotated) to do just that for years. To read more, please click here.
Deportation: Fraud Waiver Granted to Permanent Resident
Carl Shusterman writes "Yet, strict as they are, the immigration laws allow for waivers to be granted to some persons who obtained permanent residence through fraud or misrepresentation."
Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/
Immigration Law News
DOS Seeks Educational Grants
The Department of State sought requests for grant proposals for the following educational programs: Tibet Development, Professional, Educational and Cultural Exchange Projects, English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Institutes for Teachers
and Administrators From Jordan and Morocco, and International Sports Programming Initiative. All programs must comply with J-1 Visa regulations.
Attorney General Ashcroft Orders Haitian Asylee Be Denied Bond And Detained
In re D-J-, 23 I&N Dec. 572 (AG 2003) (Apr. 17, 2003), the Attorney General (AG) said that the "release of Respondent on bond was and is unwarranted due to consideration of sound immigration policy and national security that would be undercut by the release of Respondent and other undocumented alien migrants who unlawfully crossed the borders of the US on October 29, 2002."
EOIR Suspends 4 Attorneys, Reinstates 1 Attorney In Latest Disciplinary Proceedings
The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) announced in a news release that it has taken disciplinary action against five attorneys after charging them with violations of the rules of professional conduct for immigration practitioners.
Communications In Aid Of Conspiracy To Distribute Cocaine Are A Drug-Trafficking Offense
In US v. Duarte, No. 02-1066 (2nd Cir. Apr. 24, 2003), the court said that it disagreed with Defendant's argument that his prior conviction under 21 USC 843(b) for communications he made in the aid of a conspiracy to distribute cocaine was not a "drug-trafficking offense" within the meaning of 2L1.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines.
State Drug Conviction And Federal Illegal Reentry Conviction Are Unrelated For Criminal History Purposes Under USSG 4A1.2(a)(2)
In US v. Hi-Locortois, No. 02-3580 (8th Cir. Apr. 24, 2003), the court said that "The district court did not err in considering the sentences to be unrelated, and thus counting them separately in computing Defendant's criminal history. There was no formal order of consolidation, and the proceedings occurred in different courts having separate jurisdictions."
Alien Must Raise Central Arguments In Appeal To Satisfy §1326(d)
In US v. Gonzalez-Roque, No. 01-1509 (2nd Cir. Aug. 15, 2002), the court said that the exhaustion requirement that applies in immigration proceedings requires the Petitioner to raise the argument central in his appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and that the BIA "is not obligated to search [the record] for possibly meritorious appellate issues."
Attorney General Ashcroft Says Illegal Immigrants Can Be Held Indefinitely
New York Newsday reports "Illegal immigrants could be held indefinitely without bond if their cases present national security concerns, under a decision by Attorney General John Ashcroft."
Mexico Hopes To Revive Immigration Proposal That Was Quietly Abandoned After 9/11 Terrorist Attacks
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports "Mexico renewed its call for the United States to grant amnesty to some 4 million undocumented Mexicans inside U.S. territory, this time arguing that U.S. security is at stake."
Federal Prosecutors Drop All Charges Against A Man Convicted Of Immigrant Smuggling As A Result Of Dissenting Opinion
The Los Angeles Times reports "...Thanks to a dissenting opinion by one appeals court judge that was so persuasive, federal prosecutors decided to drop all charges and set Ramirez free after serving three years."
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here
For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here
Letters to the Editor
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a
qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to firstname.lastname@example.org. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.