ILW.COM is pleased to announce the arrival of an improved search engine. We thank our readers for sharing your suggestions as to how the engine can be improved. ILW.COM will continue to make futher improvements to the search engine, based on the feedback and comments we receive from our readers. We encourage our readers to continue to let us know what features you would find useful for the search engine. The search engine can be easily accessed and appears both, on the left navigation bar and on the footer of each and every ILW.COM webpage. Notable improvements for the advanced search include the ability to search within a particular sub-section of the site such as articles, cases, Immigration Daily, Immigration Weekly, or site-wide.
200,000 Attorney Searches Per Year!
Approximately 200,000 searches are made each year for immigration attorneys on ILW.COM. That's almost 400 searches per year per attorney listed in our lawyer directory. Which means that if you are listed with ILW.COM, then your listing will be searched once each day throughout the year. You need only one client a year to make a profit on your listing! For a personal discussion on listing your practice in our directory, please send an e-mail with your phone number to email@example.com. Alternatively, if you prefer to list yourself on-line, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/membership/.
Special Registration Requirements Clash with EEOC Compliance Manual on
National Origin Discrimination
Carl R. Baldwin compares the Compliance Manual of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the INS Special Registration Requirements, making him wonder "whether our national security concerns have crossed the line to become national origin discrimination."
Keep on top of the latest in immigration law! Attend ILW.COM seminars! You can attend ILW.COM phone seminars from the convenience of your office! For more info on the seminars currently available, please click here: http://www.ilw.com/seminars/
Immigration Law News
INS Issues Final Rule For Retention and Reporting of F, J, and M Nonimmigrants
The INS issued a final rule amending the INS regulations governing the retention and reporting of
information regarding F, J, and M nonimmigrants. This rule also implements the student and exchange visitor
information system (SEVIS), establishes a process for electronic
reporting by designated school officials of information required
to be reported to the INS, and provides clear standards governing
DOS Promulgates SEVIS Interim Final Rule
The Department of State promulgated an interim final rule establishing regulations and procedures
for designated Exchange Visitor Program sponsors to gain access to the
student and exchange visitor program (SEVP) database through the
student and exchange visitor information system (SEVIS) for the
reporting of information essential to the administration of their
exchange visitor program in an electronic environment.
INS Seeks Comments
The INS requested comments on: Contacts
Concerning INS Practitioner Fraud Pilot Program; Form G-1046 and Applicant
Survey; Form G-942.
Failure To Challenge BIA's Dismissal Is Waiver Of BIA's Basis Of Dismissal
In Ramirez-Ruiz v. INS, No. 02-2001 (8th Cir. Dec. 12, 2002), the court said that since Petitioner argued only that the Immigration Judge
(IJ) abused his discretion in denying his asylum petition, and did not
challenge the Board of Immigration Appeal's (BIA) summary dismissal of his
appeal from the IJ's denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of
removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture, he waived any
challenge to the BIA's basis for summary dismissal.
Requirement To Report To Probation Office Within 3 Days Of Reentry, Legal
Or Illegal, Is Not Plain Error
In US v. Calles-Abrego, No. 02-2357 (8th Cir. Dec. 12, 2002), the court said that the district court did not plainly err in imposing on
the Defendant, as a special condition of his supervised release, the
requirement that he comply with the INS rules and not reenter the US
illegally, and report to the nearest US Probation Office within 72 hours of
any reentry during his supervised release.
Case Remanded To BIA In Light Of Government Brief
In Chen v. Ashcroft, No. 99-71546 (9th Cir. Dec. 12, 2002), the court remanded the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) since
the BIA appeared ready to grant asylum until more briefing was sought at
the 9th circuit.
Consecutive Sentence For Undischarged Term Is Proper
In US v. Morales-Castillo, No. 01-00469 (11th Cir. Dec. 11, 2002), the court said that the district court properly imposed a consecutive
sentence on Defendant who was convicted of illegal reentry while serving an
undischarged term of imprisonment for a prior aggravated felony.
Immigration Lawyer Convicted
The Las Vegas Sun reports "The owner of an immigration-law firm that filed
thousands of work-permit applications with false information and phony
signatures was convicted of conspiracy, fraud and money laundering."
Nazi State Being Built In America
An opinion column in the Washington Times says "When a former Iran-Contra
defendant gets appointed to run a little-known Defense Department operation
called "Total Information Awareness," then posts a sign on his office
stating that "Knowledge Is Power," civil libertarians, not surprisingly,
are exercised. Adm. John Poindexter may be suited for the job, but is the
job suited for a free society that has, until recently, fastidiously
safeguarded the privacy of its citizens?"
Attorney listings on ILW.COM are searched 200,000 times/year! Each attorney listed is searched an average of once each day! Just one new client will pay for the entire year's fee! Click here for more info: http://www.ilw.com/membership/
Labor Certification Advertising
Do you place labor certification advertisements on behalf of your clients?
USADWEB, LLC is the premier ad agency designed with the immigration attorney’s needs in mind. Our job is to make your job easier. Our knowledgeable staff has experience with all types of recruitment media including newspapers, journals, Internet, college recruitment and more. We will provide you with expert guidance on placing advertisements and the lowest costs available from any publication. We offer one stop service and accountability for the entire advertisement recruitment effort. Our job is done only when we have mailed your client’s tearsheet or affidavit to you. You can leave the worrying to us.
Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) Advertisements: We will help you establish a recruitment pattern that is acceptable to the
Department of Labor (DOL). Simply describe your advertisement needs to us, and we will work hard to satisfy those needs. We offer a wide range of services and bring to the table expert knowledge in DOL compliant advertisement. We work with you to help assure your certifications. Have you been asked to re-advertise based on industry layoffs? With only 35 days to respond to the DOL, you need tearsheets quickly. We make these situations simple and easy for you by providing prompt, efficient service and aggressive follow-up with publications to help ensure you get what you need to complete your case in timely fashion.
Regular Labor Certification (RLC) Advertisements: Labor issues are constantly changing. With layoffs prevalent in many industries, many attorneys are turning to the regular labor certification process once more. Our knowledgeable staff can assist you in reviewing SWA (SESA) advertising instructions and placing advertisements. We will proofread your advertisements and place them promptly in the next available publication as SWA instructed.
Give us a chance to handle your clients’ recruitment needs. We will impress you! Please visit our website at: www.USadWEB.com. For more information, please contact us via email at: firstname.lastname@example.org or call us at 1-866 USADWEB (1-866 872-3932).
We carry advertisements for Help Wanted: Attorney, Help Wanted: Paralegal, Help Wanted: Other, Positions Sought, Products & Services Offered, etc.
For information on advertising in the classifieds please click here
For a listing of current immigration events please click here
For services/products of use in your law practice please click here
Letters to the Editor
Thanks for headlining the Colorado case.
Daniel M. Kowalski, Editor-in-Chief
Bender's Immigration Bulletin
In the 12-11-2002 ILW.COM featured article, Brian E. Grutman, Executive Vice President of Pilot Employment Agency II, INC., a company that brings foreign nurses to the US, makes an impassioned plea that "INS Policy Costs Tens of Thousands of American Lives Each Year" by denying that critical care registered nurses are professionals affects all Americans. Mr. Grutman also states that it would not take a change in law, but only in INS policy to right this wrong. While Mr. Grutman may be right that we need more nurses in the US, and right that perhaps critical care nurses should be considered professionals, he is wrong on the issue of policy vs. law, and it is clear he does not understand H-1B visa requirements, which are a matter of law, not INS policy, as he suggests.
The bottom line is that if ALL hospitals required critical care nurses to have a bachelor's degree as a minimum qualifying factor of employment, they should qualify for H-1B visas. The devil is in the details of the industry and the nurse licensing boards, and in the educational process. Aha! INS absolved? Perhaps, perhaps not. Perhaps it is a combination of everything . . . the horns of a dilemma from which there is no easy escape.
Nurses, whether they have a bachelor's degree or not, remain on the DOL's Schedule "A" as a recognized shortage occupation and may be directly petitioned for Permanent Residence without the need for a Labor Certification (of course, as we know, this takes a long, long time and produces permanent employees sight unseen by the employer). While it may seem odd, that because of a recognized shortage in U.S. workers, nurses can go straight to the "Green Card", without "passing Go", they cannot obtain the "quick fix" of a nonimmigrant visa (except the H-1C category which is a joke and unworkable) and there simply is no nonimmigrant visa category for which nurses can qualify. Contrary to Mr. Grutman's position, this will take an act of Congress to remedy. Perhaps Mr. Grutman has not been around long enough to be aware the former H-1A program, a really not-so-good program that for years did allow nurses to qualify for H-1 visas, that has now been abolished - by passage of law, not INS policy. Remember, under the former H-1A law, nurses did qualify for H-1A nurse visas. But that is history, relegated to the archives of immigration law by Congressional repeal of the H-1A, not by INS policy, and reinstated by the ill-conceived H-1C boondoggle that is so complex a rocket scientist could not understand and comply with, much less a hospital administrator, or, for that matter, a lawyer . . . . at least not this one - at least not for a reasonable fee.
There are three basic nonimmigrant work authorized visa categories, "E", "H" and "L". "E" visas are out for nurses because hospitals in the US are normally not owned by citizens of countries having a trade treaty with the US. "L" visa are out for nurses because not many US hospitals have overseas branches, subsidiaries, affiliates or parents. This leave the "H" category as the singular salvation for wannbe Florence Nightingales.
In order for a candidate to qualify for an H-1B visa, three basic elements must be met: 1) the alien must have a bachelor's degree or its equivalent; 2) the alien must be offered a job that is considered a "specialty occupation", i.e., an occupation that normally requires a bachelor's degree or higher as a minimum for entry-level; and 3) that the employer guarantee, through registration of a Labor Condition Application, to pay the "prevailing wage", as determined by an appropriate wage survey.
"Nurses", in the nursing industry, are not generally required to have a bachelor's degree for entry level, except in certain categories in which INS might approve the case if the nature of the nursing function clearly requires, as an occupational requirement, that the applicant have a bachelor's degree. Evidently, in Mr. Grutman's experience, critical care nurses are not one of these categories, and alludes to a period in time where INS appears to have approved some critical care nurses in 2000-2001, and he is upset at this fact, and possibly rightfully so. However, so long as there is an LVN - RN dichotomy in the nursing industry, and while LVN's and RN's continue to perform same or similar functions in the nursing industry, nurses will not qualify for H-1B visas, simply because nursing is not considered - within the industry - to be a "specialty occupation". This, sadly is by virtue of the fact that a bachelor's degree is not required as a minimum qualification for entry level. Yet, interestingly, both LVN's and RN's qualify for nursing licenses, with distinctions so miniscule, if any, they do not appear, industry wide, to qualify even degreed nurses as a "specialty occupation". Quite simply, if ALL nurses need bachelor's degrees to become licensed, all nurses should be able qualify for H-1B visas on the basis that nursing is a "specialty occupation" . . . but the fact is, bachelor's degrees are not required for minimum entry level for nurse licensure. Perhaps it is the educational system and state nurse licensing boards that are to blame, rather than INS "policy". Perhaps it is these omnipotent bodies that keep nurses relegated to non-professional status, and this is sad. While Mr. Grutman argues that critical care nurses should be H-1B eligible, it appears the entire system, not only the INS, is against him.
Contrary to Mr. Grutman's position, it would take an act of Congress to re-instate the H-1A program, or any other non-immigrant nurse visa category that would allow nurses to enter the US as nonimmigrants. Yes, the US needs nurses . . . but if the industry and the general public wants nonimmigrant nurses, they should write their Congresspersons and Senators and ask them to change the law, but let's keep the facts straight.
David D. Murray, Esq.
Newport Beach, CA
An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a
qualified attorney. Send Correspondence and articles to email@example.com. Letters and articles may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium. Opinions expressed in letters and articles do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.