ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily
Arthur L. Zabenko, Esq., Legal Editor
Nina Manchanda, Esq., Assistant Legal Editor
Marc Ellis, Esq., Chat Transcripts Editor
October 30, 2000
Editor's Comments of the Day
Cases of the Day
INS News of the Day
Immigration News of the Day
ILW.COM Highlights of the Day
ILW.COM Chats and Discussions of the Day
Letters to the Editor
Free Subscription
Enter your e-mail address:

[ Searchable archive of past issues ]
Share this page with a friend Share this page

An Important disclaimer! The information provided on this page is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt by you does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers must not act upon any information without first seeking advice from a qualified attorney. Correspondence to Letters may be edited and may be published and otherwise used in any medium.

Editor's Comments of the Day

Both the House and Senate have passed an appropriations bill for the departments of Commerce, Justice and State. The Latino and Immigrant Fairness Act was not included as part of the bill. President Clinton in a letter to Congress repeated his threat to veto the bill. The bill passed by a narrow margin, 206-198 in the House and 49-42 in the Senate. If the President follows through on his threat he may make immigration an important issue in the upcoming election.

Cases of the Day

Court Finds Jurisdiction Retoractive
In Nakaranurack v. US, No. 97-16242 (9th Cir. Oct. 27, 2000), the court rules that section 440(a) of AEDPA applies retroactively to grant courts jurisdiction over habeas petitions even if they did not have jurisdiction before the Act's effective date.

INS News of the Day

President Sends Veto Threat to Congress
In a letter from the President to the speaker of the House of Representatives, the majority leader of the Senate, and the democratic leaders of the House and Senate, the President raises his concerns with the FY 2001 Commerce, Justice, and State appropriations bill which fails to address a number of high-priority issues that the Administration had previously brought to the attention of Congress. The President writes, "the bill fails to redress several injustices in our immigration system as called for by the Latino and Immigrant Fairness Act. I have no choice but to veto this bill."

President Clinton Urges Congress to Finish Its Work
A fact sheet released by the White House explains where the Republican tax bill falls short and what issues need to be addressed by Congress before it adjourns.

Immigration News of the Day

Border Patrol Criticized for a Form of "Profiling"
The Christian Science Monitor reports that individual Border Patrol agents may be under-trained and overstepping their authority when they stop vehicles along the border and search for illegal immigrants.

ILW.COM Highlights of the Day

Cut Down the Frustration of not Reaching Your Attorney!
Keep in touch with your case using ILW.COMís case tracking system.

ILW.COM Chats and Discussions of the Day

Chat with Christine Flowers
Attorney Christine Flowers will answer questions on all aspects of immigration law on Monday, October 30, 2000, at 9:00 p.m. Eastern (New York) time. Questions will be accepted beginning 15 minutes before the start of the chat.

Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor,

I have a question or perhaps an observation of INS in that they are able to operate by a different set of standards then they are trying to enforce. They maintain that you must always be completely honest and forthright with them. I happen to agree with them I have always been cooperative and honest with them. Honesty is always the best policy. But I wonder why they are not honest with the people they are dealing with. The people whose lives they hold in their hands who are relying on the information they received from INS. The INS sends out notices with processing times on it that they know when they print them are not true. My I-485 adjustment application notice was sent to me saying that the processing time was 240-365 days. When I asked an information officer about this they said, "well don't believe that. It will take much longer than that." Indeed it is taking more than double that time. But I wonder what would happen to me if I deliberately sent them a form with wrong information on it. How am I supposed to trust and respect this organization when I cannot trust what they are telling me. I believe lying begets lying and if you'll lie to me then why don't I lie back to you.


Free Subscription
Enter your e-mail address:
          [ Searchable archive of past issues ]

© Copyright 2000 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM