ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

< Go back to Immigration Daily

Public Affairs

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Office of the Director

5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2400

Falls Church, Virginia 22041

NEWS RELEASE Contact: Office of Public Affairs

(703)305-0289, Fax: (703) 605-0365


June 16, 2000


A panel of three members of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or the Board) will travel to Chicago, Illinois, on June 16, 2000, to hear oral arguments in five pending appellate cases.  Board Members Lauren Mathon, Neil P. Miller, and Anthony C. Moscato will hear the oral arguments in the Parsons Memorial Courtroom at the District Court, 219 South Dearborn, 25 th Floor, Chicago, at 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., and 2:00 p.m.

This is the Board’s second visit to Chicago to hear oral arguments. Another panel heard oral arguments at the Chicago Immigration Court in April 1999. That same year, the Board also traveled to Miami, Florida, and in 1998 they heard oral arguments in Los Angeles, California, and San Antonio, Texas. These oral arguments are scheduled as part of an on-going initiative to make the immigration appeals process more accessible to parties in other parts of the country. It is part of a larger outreach effort by the Executive Office for Immigration Review to improve customer service overall. The cases scheduled to be heard involve interesting or novel aspects of law suitable for oral argument. The cases are summarized below.

Case Summaries

Matter of Lulgjuraj, A18 712 781 - This case involves an ethnic Albanian from Serbia-Montenegro who entered the United States as a refugee when he was a child, and later committed crimes here. The Immigration Judge found the respondent ineligible for withholding of removal but granted deferral of removal under the Convention against Torture. This case involves cross-appeals. At issue on one side in this case is whether the respondent’s 1974 youthful offender “adjudication” under New York law is a conviction for immigration purposes and, if it is, whether it is a “particularly serious crime.” The issue on the other side is whether the Immigration Judge erred in granting deferral of removal.

Matter of Vay, A27 303 634 - This case involves an alien who entered the United States in 1984 as a 6-year-old derivative refugee from Cambodia. In December 1997, he was convicted of burglary of a vehicle, under section 459 of the California Penal Code. He received a 16-month sentence. At issue in this case is whether the respondent’s conviction constitutes a “particularly serious crime”