ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Find a Lawyer                         More Options

State:

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Classifieds

RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Find a lawyer

Seminars

Immigration books

Advertise

Resources

Blogs

About ILW.COM

Link to us


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Share this page

Bookmark this page

Print this page

del.icio.us Add to del.icio.us

Find a Lawyer
State:

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
© 1995-2008
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Dear Editor:
If there was an Attorney General advocating only Immigration Daily's preferred interpretation of liberty from one of the following three: "hegemonic liberty", "reciprocal liberty" or "natural liberty", but not "ordered liberty", thereby "elevating his own concept of liberty over all the others" (as Immigration Daily phrased it) would Immigration Daily then be acusing that person of "diminished liberty in America, not enhanced it”? If Immigration Daily did not act in a consistent fashion, then that would be intellectual dishonesty.

Dan Ehrlich, Attorney at Law

Editor's Note: Mr. Fischer's point (in his book, "Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America") is that it is the tension between all four visions of liberty that keeps the American tradition of liberty alive. He opines, and we agree, that elevating any one of the four over the others would diminish liberty.


Copyright © 1999-2002 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM


Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

Search for:          Advanced search