TESTIMONY
OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN
M. MORGANELLI BEFORE
THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON
IMMIGRATION, BORDER,
SECURITY AND CLAIMS – WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2003
ROOM 2237 OF THE RAYBURN
HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING ON
THE “CLEAR LAW
ENFORCEMENT FOR CRIMINAL ALIEN
REMOVAL ACT OF 2003
(CLEAR ACT)
Good afternoon. My
name is John M. Morganelli and I am the elected District Attorney in Northampton
County, Pennsylvania. I have served as District Attorney for twelve
(12) years and I am a past President of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys
Association, a statewide Association of prosecutors in Pennsylvania.
On June
25, 2003 there occurred in Northampton County a
ceremony that is often repeated in courthouses throughout the United
States. A number of individuals from all parts of the
world participated in a naturalization ceremony that resulted in new citizens
of the United States of America. I had the pleasure of meeting some of these
individuals who were beaming with pride, carrying American flags as they swore
the oath of naturalization and U.S.
citizenship. These people immigrated to
the United States
legally, followed the rules, did what was required to become U.S.
citizens and now enjoy what America has to
offer them. I have no doubt that they, like many before them and many who will come
after them, will be productive citizens contributing to the greatness of America.
Unfortunately, there are also those who come to America
illegally. They come not with an intent to commit to the American way, but rather to evade
the law, commit crime and impact negatively on our country. In the last ten (10) years, there has been a
staggering increase in the number of illegal aliens residing in Pennsylvania. INS, now ICE, estimated that the illegal
alien population of Pennsylvania in
1992 to be about 27,000. In 1996 that
number jumped 37% to approximately 37,000.
The 2000 census suggests that the number of illegal aliens in Pennsylvania is
somewhere between 100,000 and 200,000.
Nationwide, the estimates of illegal aliens living in the United
States is somewhere between 9 and 13
million.
Despite the voices of those who naively believe that the
influx of this estimated 9 to 13 million illegal aliens into the United States
is a positive thing, the fact of the matter is that illegal immigration is
having an extremely negative impact upon America at many levels. Unfortunately, the majority of illegal aliens
who are here are engaged in criminal activity.
Identity theft, use of fraudulent social security numbers and green
cards, tax evasion, driving without licenses represent some of the crimes that
are engaged in by the majority of illegal aliens on a daily basis merely to
maintain and hide their illegal status.
In addition, violent crime and drug distribution and possession is also prevalent among illegal aliens. Over 25% of today’s federal prison population are illegal aliens. In some areas of the country, 12% of
felonies, 25% of burglaries and 34% of thefts are committed by illegal
aliens. The numerous crimes being
committed by illegal aliens such as identity theft, fraud and use of false
identification is causing havoc with record-keeping systems including but not
limited to Social Security, income tax and other compilation of data that we
have routinely relied upon for accuracy and identity verification. Just about every day, municipal and state
police come in contact with illegal aliens who are utilizing fraudulent
documents, false names and other people’s identities. Identification of these individuals is
impossible and, quite frankly, many of the illegal aliens committing crimes
here in the United States have criminal records from their country of origin
which cannot be ascertained because of their continuous use of false
identities. Clearly, in addition to
being a crime issue, the growing population of illegal aliens in the United
States is without a doubt the single
most important national security issue facing us. As an example of that, in May 2002 federal
agents arrested 2 Egyptian nationals for trying to smuggle illegal Middle
Eastern immigrants into New Jersey by way
of Mexico. For a fee of $8,000.00, court documents
showed the suspected smuggling ring flew customers on tourist visas to Brazil,
then sent them to Guadamala through Mexico and finally across the southwest
border into the U.S. With regard to our
northern border in Blaine, Washington, a
retired Deputy Chief of Border Patrol Agent Eugene Davis stated recently that
there has been no effort to locate 95% of aliens apprehended in his region over
the past 10 years and released pending deportation hearings. According to Davis, these
illegal aliens have simply been allowed to disappear into the United
States. No one knows whether a number of these
missing persons are trained terrorists who will emerge to perpetrate more acts
of terrorism inside the United
States.
Then, there is the direct cost to taxpayers as a result
of the criminal acts committed by illegal aliens. In Pennsylvania the
financial cost to taxpayers is staggering.
Pennsylvania
requested compensation from the federal government in fiscal year 1999 for the
incarceration expenses for about 196,676 days of detention for illegal aliens
in state and local jails and prisons.
The cost to Pennsylvania
taxpayers amounted to $13,350,000.00.
Under the “State Criminal Alien Assistance Program” (SCAAP), Pennsylvania
received $5 million leaving $8 million of uncompensated cost to be footed by Pennsylvania
taxpayers. In fiscal year 2000, Pennsylvania
received $4.3 million. Payments to the
states were lower overall so local taxpayers were faced to absorb a much larger
share of the cost of criminal illegal alien incarceration. Clearly, illegal immigration into the United
States is a negative and not a plus
and must be addressed for a variety of the aforesaid reasons. But the solution lies in empowering local and
state police with the authority to arrest, detain and deport illegal
aliens. Clearly, the CLEAR Act, which
you are considering today, would expressly authorize local and state law
enforcement to investigate, apprehend, detain and remove aliens in the United
States. The CLEAR Act provides economic incentives
and penalties for those municipalities and states who for whatever reasons do
not recognize the seriousness of this problem and fail or lack the desire to
help with this growing problem. In Pennsylvania, not
only in the Lehigh Valley where
I serve as the District Attorney, law enforcement has taken an interest in
identifying and removing illegal aliens.
There have been efforts in the Scranton Wilkes-Barre area by local
police and in western Pennsylvania to
deal with this issue but, unfortunately, local and state law enforcement at the
present time have to rely on federal officials. In the past, the federal government has not
shown much interest in this issue. For
example, on a number of occasions, my office as well as local
and state police have come into contact with illegal aliens who have
admitted their illegal status and entry into the United
States. When federal agencies such as
the INS now ICE were contacted, we were often told that as long as these
criminal aliens were not committing additional crimes, they should just be let
go. I have also been told that in the
past INS discourages “this type of investigation.” In other words, it is not enough for them to
be aware of the fact that there are thousands of illegal aliens living in our communities, we are told that they must essentially be
committing some other type of crime before the federal government would get
involved. When arrests
are made by local police on state charges such as identity theft, etc.
INS will often inform us that they are “not interested” in detaining and
deporting these kinds of illegal immigrants.
For some reason, the federal government continues to believe that
immigration violations by themselves do not warrant much enforcement. In my view, this thinking must change and the
CLEAR Act certainly is an indication from the Congress that the thinking has in
fact changed. The fact of the matter is
that the cost to society from the impact of illegal aliens is so severe, we can no longer afford not to act or leave this
problem exclusively to the federal government.
Local prosecutors, local and state police must be empowered, aggressive
and diligent with respect to the presence of illegal aliens. Although some may argue that most local
police departments do not want to enforce immigration violations and have
resisted the idea of using their officers to track down illegal immigrants,
reasoning that crime fighting is better served by building relationships of
trust in immigrant communities, I believe that now in the wake of September 11,
2001 a growing percent of law enforcement agencies around the country are
beginning to equate illegal immigration and immigration enforcement with
protecting national security and they want to be involved. You have seen pilot programs in the state of Florida
empowering local law enforcement to enforce immigration laws. Implementation of the provisions of the CLEAR
Act would, perhaps, make unnecessary the memorandums of understandings that
some jurisdictions are seeking with the Justice Department in order to obtain
power for state and local police to enforce immigration laws.
In summary, let me therefore state unequivocally that as
a state prosecutor, I believe that this legislation is necessary. However, I caution you that the ultimate
success of this goal will be based upon the political will of both political
parties here in Washington. Quite frankly, I am not very optimistic. I believe that both the Republicans and the
Democrats are to blame for the present lack of enthusiasm on the part of the
government to enforce immigration laws.
Business interests that often influence Republican Party politics clearly
want cheap labor and often employ illegal aliens in menial jobs paid less than
the minimum wage. On the other hand, the
Democratic Party continuously at the national level panders to ethnic politics. Obviously, the CLEAR Act is not a panacea and
we cannot overnight deal with the issue of the huge invasion of illegal aliens
into America. And, it is also clear that even with an
aggressive approach to enforcement and passage of the CLEAR Act, we continue to
have the problem of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens invading our
country on a regular basis through our northern and southern borders. And lastly, there must also be attention to
immigration judges who routinely, after local law enforcement has apprehended,
arrested and prosecuted an illegal alien, often release these illegal aliens
back out into the community on ROR or minimal bail with an order for them to
deport. Of course, these illegal aliens
again disappear into American society, adopt a new false identity, a new false
name and relocate to some other community.
Occasionally, we have seen the people that we have prosecuted come right
back to my area resuming again their jobs, life under another name and another
social security number. The effort to
clean up this mess cannot only be done legislatively via the CLEAR Act, but
must recognize the other areas related to immigration enforcement that also
must be addressed. Nevertheless, the
CLEAR Act is necessary because without an empowered municipal
and local departments throughout the United
States, the problem will continue to
grow and get worse.
I would like to thank the Chairman of the Committee and
members of the Committee for inviting me to offer these comments today.
Copyright © 1999-2002 American Immigration LLC, ILW.COM
|