STATEMENT
OF
KEITH M. OLSON
PRESIDENT
LOCAL 2913
(WASHINGTON, IDAHO AND MONTANA)
NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL
OF THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
AFL-CIO
HOW THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
PROCESSES PERSONS ARRESTED FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY INTO
THE
UNITED STATES OUTSIDE PORTS OF ENTRY
BEFORE THE
PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONSCOMMITTEE
ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
UNITED STATES SENATE
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2001
DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
ROOM 342
9:30 AM
Chairman Levin and honorable members of the
Subcommittee, I thank you for providing me with
this opportunity to testify about my knowledge of
Border Patrol operations. I have been a Border
Patrol agent for nearly 14 years, and deeply love
my job and the organization. The Border Patrol
was once a very proud, elite law enforcement
organization whose morale was very high. This
changed a few years ago, and morale has been
steadily deteriorating since that time. My fellow
agents and I want to reverse that trend and
restore the efficiency and pride of the United
States Border Patrol.
Sadly, there are some managers in the Immigration
and Naturalization Service (I&NS) and Border
Patrol who have been less than honest with our
elected representatives and the public. Following
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when
asked if our northern border was secure, they
tried to assure everyone that everything was
under control. At that time, there were only 324
border patrol agents on the northern border. To
this day, that number has not increased. Not one
additional Border Patrol agent has been assigned
to the northern border since that fateful day.
Instead, the agents here have been working 12
hours a day, averaging from 68 to 90 hours of
work each week. All 100 of the Border Patrol
agents temporarily assigned to the northern
border under Operation Northern Shield are
assisting with security at the ports of entry
where Immigration Inspectors and Customs
Inspectors work. None of them are assisting us in
patrolling the 4,000 miles of border between
those ports of entry. There are approximately 9,000
Border Patrol agents assigned to patrol the
southwest border. That translates to one agent
for every 1,300 feet on the southern border. In
sharp contrast, there is only one agent for every
13 miles on the northern border. If you were a
terrorist, where would you take your chances?
The Border Patrol agents on the northern border
appreciate the manpower increases mandated by the
USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, and urge Congress to
fund these vital positions and ensure that
experienced agents are allowed to transfer there
instead of utilizing new-hires. It would require
several years to properly train new-hires, and
help is desperately needed now. Moreover,
depriving experienced agents of the opportunity
to fill these desirable positions would further
demoralize the workforce and increase attrition
beyond its alarmingly high current levels.
Accountability needs to be restored to the
I&NS and Border Patrol. Committee oversight
and investigations such as todays hearing
are an important part of that process.
Most of the illegal aliens from countries other
than Mexico that are apprehended on the northern
border are released on personal recognizance
pending their deportation hearings before
immigration judges. In other words, they merely
sign a piece of paper promising to appear when
given a court date. They provide an unverified
address and then walk out the door. Thousands
never return for their court dates, which usually
results in an order of deportation being issued in
absentia. There are many thousands of un-served
warrants of deportation languishing in I&NS
file rooms across the country. Unfortunately,
very little time is devoted to tracking down
these law-breakers. Occasionally, the Border
Patrol intercepts aliens who have an outstanding
warrant during its daily operations, but that is
very rare. The I&NS Investigations Program
has primary jurisdiction over these matters, but
it is not a priority. In fact, in the area of
Washington State where I have worked since 1994,
I have never seen or even heard of an I&NS
investigator attempting to seek out and arrest
the subjects of these warrants. This too must
change. The I&NS needs to be directed to
focus more of its resources on this important
task. Interior enforcement has been neglected for
too long, and must become a priority for the
I&NS.
Because of a lack of funding for removals, the
Border Patrol also routinely fails to remove
illegal aliens who are apprehended on the
northern border. These aliens are given a form I-210,
instructing them to leave the United States
within 30 days, and are released. Again, there
are no controls to verify if the alien ever
actually leaves the United States. It is not
uncommon to re-arrest aliens who never bothered
to leave the United States as instructed.
Hopefully, that time there is available jail
space. If not, the process is repeated all over
again.
In my experience, criminal records checks are
performed for most illegal aliens apprehended in
my Sector. This is not uniform throughout the 21
Border Patrol Sectors, however. Most of the
persons arrested for being in the United States
illegally are never issued an alien registration
number. Millions of illegal aliens are merely
processed on the INS alien arrest
processing system known as ENFORCE. All arrested
aliens are supposed to be processed in this
database. After the arrested alien is processed
in ENFORCE, the aliens right and left index
fingerprints are entered into another database
system called IDENT. In theory, this biometric
database tracks every immigration arrest of an
individual. In practice, however, it is flawed.
It is not always on-line, making it impossible to
input data for all arrested aliens. It also
sometimes yields unreliable results. I have
personally seen it issue two different record
numbers for the same person when in theory there
should only be one arrest history number based on
the same set of two fingerprints. This can happen
for a variety of reasons, such as dirty
fingerprints, severely scraped or cut and damaged
fingerprints from manual labor, which alters the
skin patterns. I dont claim to be a
fingerprint expert, but since the IDENT system is
based on only two fingerprints, it appears to me
that this small sampling contributes to the
errors. It is important to note that the I&NS
IDENT system does not interface with the FBIs
fingerprint system and vice versa. The FBI
fingerprint system is based on all ten
fingerprints, not just two. Perhaps the biggest
flaw in the IDENT system is its limited amount of
storage. Once it reaches its maximum memory, it
deletes the oldest records in order to make room
for newer entries. Obviously, all fingerprint
data should be retained indefinitely.
If an agent suspects that an alien has a criminal
record, the agent must take fingerprints the old-fashioned
way with cards and ink, enlarge them to 200% on a
photocopier and then fax those copies to the FBI
for analysis. Even with such an archaic method,
we frequently get a match from the FBI. Taking
advantage of the available technology would
undoubtedly allow us to submit more fingerprints
and increase the number of matches. The FBI
fingerprint check is not a mandatory required
record check. It is performed solely at the
discretion of the arresting agent.
The I&NS has a number of other record check
subsystems, most of which do not even interface
with each other, much less with those of other
law enforcement agencies. There is clearly a need
for much more coordination and information
sharing. Moreover, information on many non-immigrant
visitors is not entered into any databases,
diminishing their utility.
Further complicating the difficult task of
determining an arrested aliens criminal
history is the fact that it is almost impossible
to obtain criminal checks from other countries.
The only foreign criminal records that I have
ever received were from Canada.
The low amount of bonds placed on criminal aliens
is another major problem in the current system.
For example, aliens who are arrested by the
Border Patrol and determined to be a public
safety or flight risk are generally given a bond
amount of over $25,000. That figure is entered
into the appropriate space on the form I-286,
Bond Determination form, and the subject is
turned over to the I&NS District detention
facility. While at the detention facility, an
I&NS deportation officer can re-determine the
subjects bond down to a figure as low as $500.00
or even a personal recognizance signature. For
the sake of the safety of our communities, this
should not be allowed to happen.
Despite its flaws, the U.S. Border Patrol retains
a fair degree of respect among federal law
enforcement agencies. It would be greatly
improved if it were free to make enforcement
decisions based on the law instead of the
political agenda of bureaucrats. These concerns
are shared by labor and management alike. You
will hear the same concerns voiced by my former
Deputy Chief Patrol Agent who is also here to
testify today.
I sincerely believe that these problems are not
insurmountable, and in fact I am heartened by the
willingness of the new I&NS Commissioner to
take a fresh look at some of the problems in the
organization. For example, he has recognized that
the low pay structure of the Border Patrol agent
position contributes greatly to the attrition
problem, and is actively seeking funding for an
upgrade. I am also hopeful that we can work with
him to correct some of the problems that I have
identified today.
We also need the assistance of Congress to obtain
the resources and provide the mandate necessary
for us to do our job. The brave men and women of
the U.S. Border Patrol stand ready to secure our
nations borders and interior areas and
enforce the immigration laws of the United States.
As one of their union representatives, I stand
ready to provide you with truthful answers to
your questions.
|