ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


Immigration Daily




The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.


< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily

Bloggings on Political Asylum

by Jason Dzubow

Albanian Informant and His Family Granted Asylum Finally

A decade ago, Edmond Demiraj agreed to testify against an Albanian mobster charged with human smuggling.  He claimed that, in exchange for his testimony, federal prosecutors promised to keep him and his family safe.  The mobster, Bill Bedini, fled the country before his trial, and so the federal government had no need for Mr. Demirajs testimony.  He was deported to Albania.

The Fifth Circuit decision means that if JR gets shot, the Ewings don't get asylum.

In Albania, Mr. Bedini was waiting.  He kidnapped, beat, and shot Mr. Demiraj, who eventually recovered and made his way back to the U.S.  This time, he was granted Withholding of Removal.

Meanwhile, an Immigration Judge and the BIA denied asylum to Mr. Demirajs wife and son, and ordered them deported.  The pair reopened their case after Mr. Demiraj was shot in Albania and after Mr. Bedini kidnapped some other relatives and trafficked them to Italy.  The wife and son claimed that if they returned to Albania, Mr. Bedini would harm them on account of their particular social groupmembership in the Demiraj family.  The case was again denied and finally reached the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the BIA and ordered Mrs. Demiraj and her son deported to Albania.

While the Fifth Circuit agreed that family could constitute a particular social group, it reasoned that Mr. Bedini did not seek to harm Mrs. Demiraj and her son on account of her membership in the Demiraj family.  Rather, Mr. Bedini wanted to harm her and her son in retaliation for Mr. Demirajs cooperation with the United States government:

The crucial finding here is that the record discloses no evidence that Mrs. Demiraj would be targeted for her membership in the Demiraj family as such. Rather, the evidence strongly suggests that Mrs. Demiraj, her son, and Mr. Demirajs nieces [who were trafficked to Italy] were targeted because they are people who are important to Mr. Demirajthat is, because hurting them would hurt Mr. Demiraj. No one suggests that distant members of the Demiraj family have been systematically targeted as would be the case if, for example, a persecutor sought to terminate a line of dynastic succession.  Nor does the record suggest that the fact of Mr. and Mrs. Demirajs marriage and formal inclusion in the Demiraj family matters to Bedini; that is, Mrs. Demiraj would not be any safer in Albania if she divorced Mr. Demiraj and renounced membership in the family, nor would she be any safer if she were Mr. Demirajs girlfriend of many years rather than his wife. The record here discloses a quintessentially personal motivation, not one based on a prohibited reason under the INA.

Mrs. Demiraj and her son filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court.  They were supported by a number of amicus briefs, including one by former law enforcement officials.  That brief takes the position that Mr. Demirajs family members are a particular social group and that they will be persecuted because Mr. Bedini seeks to harm all members of Mr. Demirajs family.  Further, the brief expresses concern that civilians very likely will not cooperate [with law enforcement officers] when they fear that doing so would put their families in danger.  The Fifth Circuits decision would obviously discourage such cooperation.

In the end, the petition for certiorari was withdrawn.  DOJafter requesting 10 continuances to respond to the cert petitionfinally agreed to grant asylum to Mr. Demiraj and his family.  The result is certainly a relief to the Demiraj family.  But the bad news is that the Fifth Circuits exceedingly narrow definition of family as a particular social group remains on the books.

Congratulations to Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, who represented the Demiraj family.

Originally posted on the Asylumist: www.Asytlumist.com.


About The Author

Jason Dzubow's practice focuses on immigration law, asylum, and appellate litigation. Mr. Dzubow is admitted to practice law in the federal and state courts of Washington, DC and Maryland, the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Eleventh, and DC Circuits, all Immigration Courts in the United States, and the Board of Immigration Appeals. He is a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and the Capital Area Immigrant Rights (CAIR) Coalition. In June 2009, CAIR Coalition honored Mr. Dzubow for his Outstanding Commitment to Defending the Rights and Dignity of Detained Immigrants.


The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.