ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily

I-9 And E-Verify News Updates

by Ann Cun

In the world of I-9 and E-Verify News, updates come and go very quickly. Iím keeping this blog short and sweet, especially in light of our big Webinar on Electronic I-9 Implementations today!

A New Round of 500 Notices of Inspections (NOIs)

According to our immigration practitioner partners in the field, ICE recently sent another round of 500 new Notices of Inspection (NOIs) last Thursday, March 29, 2012, to employers in several states. This is in addition to the last round announced in February this year. That brings us to 1,000 NOIs announced (and maybe issued already) to date for 2012. NOIs are, in essence, a notice from ICE that an organization has been selected for an inspection of its I-9 Forms and other accompanying business documents.

As with previous NOI announcements, ICE does not to release many details regarding its audits (for good reason). Typically, you wonít read about NOI announcements in any official government release (save at the end of the fiscal year when ICE will report on total numbers of inspections conducted). Weíll be providing more details on this latest audit sweep direct from our partners, so stay tuned!

Alabamaís E-Verify Law Is Now In Effect

Alabamaís E-Verify law (HB56) is officially in effect for most organizations in the state. As of April 1, 2012, employers and business entities in the state of Alabama must enroll in the federal E-Verify program. The Associated Press ran an article yesterday detailing how enrollment compliance has been for local employers in Alabama. According to the Associated Press article, USCIS reports a little over 18,000 employers in Alabama have enrolled in the E-Verify Program. Thatís less than 5% of the total number of companies doing business in Alabama, according to records from the Alabama Department of Revenue.

One of the interesting points raised was the issue of how employers have educated themselves on the necessity to enroll in E-Verify. At least until the United States Supreme Court decides on Arizona v. United States regarding SB1070, and perhaps even in spite of the ruling this upcoming June, states are left to their own devices when it comes to enacting E-Verify laws. This leaves employers with a duty to stay tuned to how local laws will affect the way they conduct business.

USCIS Makes List of E-Verify Enrolled Employers Available

We wondered for a long time if and when USCIS would make publicly available a list of employers enrolled in the Federal E-Verify Program. The wait has finally ended (sort of). USCIS has indeed made available a list of these employers on its website. The list will be updated quarterly, but note that it is NOT a comprehensive list.

Originally published by LawLogix Group Inc Reprinted by permission

About The Author

Ann Cun is a U.S. based immigration attorney who has helped companies in the technology, science, business, sports, entertainment and arts fields secure complex work visas for their employees. With more than a decade of experience as a paralegal and attorney, Ms. Cun possesses a stellar record of success. Her legal expertise also includes conducting internal I-9 audits for companies and developing I-9 compliant strategies and solutions. She is a graduate of UCLA and UC Hastings School of Law and has been invited to speak by the Bar Association of San Francisco and the American Immigration Lawyers Association on U.S. immigration related topics, as well as other international conferences. Ms. Cun is a contributing author and currently serves as Counsel and Principal Editor for LawLogix Group.

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.