ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily

Bloggings on Immigration Law

by Danielle Beach

Secure Communities Shut Down Or a Bird Of a Different Color,

Finally, the day has come where some common sense has been injected into 287(g)
Secure communities program that should never have been implemented to start with and
was doomed to failure from its inception. This program trained local officers to act as
immigration officers without the training or knowledge needed.

Close to 70 agencies had signed contracts with ICE and though the program began as a
voluntary one, it became increasingly clear that opting-out was just not an option. Those
counties or cities that refused to participate were put under pressure and criticized as
sanctuaries for the illegal immigrants. Clearly the program became under increasing
financial constraints under President Obama as it grew bigger and bigger and more and
more mistakes and problems were discovered.

This program had many enemies aside from the victims. Victims included those who
had petty offenses such as traffic lights, tags, speeding but also those who had witnessed
a crime but were too afraid of arrest to then report it or who were victims themselves of
abuse by citizens. A report by Migration Policy, stated that immigrants had “ fear and
mistrust” of authorities as their police who was supposed to protect them became ICE
agents. Often police officers who felt that this was just not their job and that they were
at the risk of losing the confidence of their communities as well as of being at risk of
being sued for errors that they might make. Legislators also often opposed the program
as the cost burden became increasingly evident. Even the Homeland Security Inspector
General criticized the program in reports stating that it was leading to “racial profiling” as
well as mistakes due to lack of training.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum stated the “secure
communities program is surrounded by grave concerns about the impact to public safety,
community policing and civil right abuses.”

Now Department of Homeland Security has stated that it will not sign new contracts
for 287 (g) officers working in the field and that it will terminate some of the “least
productive” agreements. Just this step alone is estimated to save our nation over $17

In reality, though the Secure Communities program will be expanded and just the 287
(g) program will be phased out. This means that the fingerprints of all people booked
into local jails will be checked against federal immigration databases and ICE agents will
then lodge a detainer on them before they are released. So the only difference will be to
those who have not had their fingerprints taken in a federal database as they may be more
difficult to identify.

This is unlikely to mollify either side of the debate. For immigration advocates want both
programs to end rather to be curtailed.

About The Author

Danielle Beach-Oswald is the current President and Managing Partner of Beach-Oswald Immigration Law Associates in Washington, DC. Ms. Beach utilizes her 19 years of experience in immigration law to help individuals immigrate to the United States for humanitarian reasons. Born in Brussels, Belgium, Ms. Beach has lived in England, Belgium, Italy and Ivory Coast and has traveled extensively to many countries. Ms. Beach advocates for clients from around the world who seek freedom from torture in their country, or who are victims of domestic violence and trafficking. She has also represented her clients at U.S. Consulates in Romania, China, Canada, Mexico, and several African countries. With her extensive experience in family-based and employment-based immigration law Ms. Beach not only assists her clients in obtaining a better standard of living in the United States, she also helps employers obtain professional visas, and petitions for family members. She also handles many complex naturalization issues. Ms. Beach has unique expertise representing clients in immigration matters pending before the Federal District Courts, Circuit Courts, Board of Immigration Appeals and Immigration Courts. She has won over 400 humanitarian cases in the United States. Her firm's website is

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.