ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Bloggings: June 7, 2007

by Greg Siskind, Esq.

Editor's note: Here are the latest entries from Greg Siskind's blog.

June 05, 2007

DURBIN AMENDMENT EASILY APPROVED

A provision in the Senate bill would allow for the recruiting requirements for Y visas to be waived if the Labor Department certifies a shortage (just as is the case with Schedule A for permanent residency cases). The Durbin Amendment would require recruiting in all cases regardless of how clear the shortage is to the federal government.

Senator Spector (R-PA) spoke against the amendment reminding members that workers are already protected and that nurses in particular would be affected by this. He indicated that this requirement would be a waste of time and money. Senator Durbin has become the anti-nursing immigration Senator in the last year so one cannot say the fact that he sponsored this amendment is surprising. He's also credited with getting the green card cap exemption for nurses stripped from the bill.

The real winners here, unfortunately, are the immigration lawyers like myself who will certainly have more work to do in Y visa cases. That's good news for the bottom line of my law firm, but it is still bad public policy.