ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

Bloggings: April 19, 2007

by Greg Siskind, Esq.

Editor's note: Here are the latest entries from Greg Siskind's blog.

April 18, 2007


I'm sure most USCIS examiners try and do their best to make quality decisions. But ask an honest, experienced examiner and they'll admit that as the agency has expanded and rapidly brought on more and more examiners, the lack of experience is showing.

So instead of focusing on improving the quality of decision making, the folks at USCIS headquarters have come up with the bright idea of giving examiners even MORE power. USCIS examiners will now be able to deny cases without giving applicants an opportunity to respond to a notice of intent to deny and they will also be able to determine how much time applicants have to respond to a request for evidence. Today, there is a standard 120 days permitted to respond. The memorandum simply says the examiner is to decide whether the evidence is easy to obtain or difficult and set the response time for the request for evidence accordingly.

For those of us who practice immigration law, this is a recipe for disaster. Examiners can make assumptions on how long is reasonable to respond, but they may be completely off base. And there are no provisions for an extension of a request for evidence. The evidence requested is often completely irrelevant to eligibility anyway. Bad examiners will now will be even more likely to issue bad decisions.