My Pet Peeves
cat’s name is not Peeves! This month I present my personal list of grammatical
pet peeves culled from years of editing and from simply listening to others
mangle the English language. Just the choice of words used to express an idea,
not the idea itself, can annoy and distract a listener or a reader. In informal
writing and in letters home, poor writing is almost forgivable. But you
can never use there for their (or they’re) without
being considered careless. Pay attention to the small grammatical details, even
in letters to Mom (she’ll notice). Trite, common, and overused
No, my cat’s name is not Peeves! This month I present my personal list of grammatical pet peeves culled from years of editing and from simply listening to others mangle the English language. Just the choice of words used to express an idea, not the idea itself, can annoy and distract a listener or a reader. In informal writing and in letters home, poor writing is almost forgivable. But you can never use there for their (or they’re) without being considered careless. Pay attention to the small grammatical details, even in letters to Mom (she’ll notice).
Trite, common, and overused phrases.How often have you heard someone use these phrases?
dumb as a doorknob
go the mat for you
like the pot calling the kettle black
no pain, no gain
on the same page
out of the frying pan and into the fire
poor as a church mouse
push the envelope
think outside the box
white as a sheet
The Vocabula Review (http://www.vocabula.com/) correctly labels these constructions “dimwitticisms.” Trite phrases are the mark of a thoughtless or lazy writer. If you’ve heard a phrase before, then do not use it. That is the rule, period. Perhaps other, lesser writers can use common phrases, but you may not.
Redundant and illogical idioms. An idiom is an expression that means something different from the literal meaning of the individual words—e.g., a cool cat. Even boyfriend doesn’t mean boy friend; it means sweetheart (which is also an idiom). We all use idioms, but let us avoid the patently idiotic ones. The table below identifies some classics:
as per usual as usual
as of yet yet
even as we speak now
first annual first
has gone missing is missing
last but not least last
manner by which how
needless to say self-evident
off of off
refer back refer
reflect back reflect
stole my thunder used my idea
try and try to
type of a type of
Homonym misuse. How many times have you received an e-mail that says, “Your [You’re] welcome”? It’s maddening! Some obvious examples: your/you’re; there/their/they’re; to/too/two; here/hear; principle/principal; past/passed; weather/whether. The problem occurs when an author writes in haste and fails to proofread for context. A spell checker won’t catch these errors.
Incorrect pronoun cases. If you listen closely to our friends on Capitol Hill or read their extended remarks in the Congressional Record, you would spot this faulty construction with some frequency: “The Committee sent the report to Senator Johnson and I [me].” Or, “It’s an issue between the Senator and I [me].”
Overuse of qualifying adverbs and adjectives. My husband and I once created a list of the most overused descriptive words that we had heard. At the top of the list were quaint, colorful, rustic, and picturesque. Add to that list very, really, quite, and truly—all unnecessary.
Verbing of nouns. According to The Editorial Eye, this is “the pettest peeve of all.” Editors detest impact as a verb and replace it with affect. Word curmudgeons have been known to put pencils through their papers deleting the word impact. Dictionaries support its use as a verb, but dictionaries (as a rule) represent common usage as opposed to formal grammar.
Avoid using contact to mean communicate. I learned this lesson early in my career as a librarian/editor. I had innocently distributed a library manual to the entire firm, complete with a transmittal letter directing attorneys to contact me if they had any questions. Much to my dismay, I found myself engaged in a prolonged argument with a partner who took great glee in informing me that contact implied physical touch rather than communication. Although I found support for my position in the Oxford English Dictionary (and subsequently in business letters authored by the attorney), I never forgot the lesson.
Irregardless. This is not a word! Irrespective is acceptable, but irregardless is not. My Aunt Gladys, a strict English teacher, once whispered to me that there is one case where irregardless is actually correct: If there was a riot in southern Ohio, and the National Guard was called out to quell the riot, then that would leave irregardless. Ahem!
If you are interested in reading further on this topic, I recommend the