ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search


Immigration Daily

Archives

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board

Resources

Blogs

Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation

Attorney2Attorney

CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network

EB-5

Chinese Immig. Daily

About ILW.COM

Connect to us

Make us Homepage

Questions/Comments


SUBSCRIBE

Immigration Daily

 

Chinese Immig. Daily



The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free
information!

Copyright
©1995-
ILW.COM,
American
Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:



< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

The Appropriate Use Of Less And Fewer

by Diane Sandford

After watching a particularly annoying television commercial for a new local bank that promised less paperwork to set up an account, less time to process transactions, and less lines at the counter, I realized that many of us do not understand the appropriate use of less and fewer.  In the bank commercial, grammar fell victim to a misguided attempt for consistency in sentence structure. 

Itís difficult to master the subtleties of English and, in particular, the fine distinction between fewer and less.  Even some well-respected authors have had trouble with it. When the late Isaac Asimov, author of more than 400 science and science fiction books, was asked if he followed the fewer/less rule, he told the editors of the Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage that he had never heard of it. 

So why is it important to commit this rule to memory when some notable writers arenít familiar with the rule?  The answer is simple:  The grammatical misuse of less and fewer can be a jarring distraction.  Whether youíre writing a formal document or a simple email, keep your reader focused on the message by avoiding grammatical stop signs.

Rule:    Use fewer to describe countable things. Use less to describe uncountable quantities, collective amounts, and degree.  These terms are not interchangeable.

If you can substitute much as the modifier, then use less; if you can substitute many, use fewer.

Look at some examples: 

  • Fewer law suits result in less litigation
  • Although sand may be technically countable, no one ever does; hence, the less sand we find in our beach bag, the better.
  • The estate is valued at less than a million dollars. (Consider ďa million dollarsĒ a collective noun unless you plan to count specific dollar bills.)     

    And point of view can complicate the issue:

    Do I have fewer or less children than you? If children is an amount in my mind, then I should use less; if I mean children as a number of distinct individuals, then I should use fewer.

    Does Option A have fewer or less advantages than Option B?  If the advantages are fewer in number, use fewer.  If they are less in degree, then use less

    Nevertheless, these sentences are risky.  What was the authorís intent?  If the reader has the opposite interpretation in mind, then the author appears to have made a mistakeóor worse, doesnít know the difference.  Always look for possible misinterpretations of your word choice and, if necessary, recast the sentence to eliminate the ambiguity. 

    Who creates such rules?  This particular rule can be traced to Robert Baker, who in 1770 suggested that ďNo Fewer than a Hundred appears to be not only more elegant than No Less than a Hundred, but more strictly proper.Ē  Perhaps his remark had a significant influence on the grammar mavens of his age.  Perhaps others reached the same conclusion on their own.  Who knows?  But Bakerís suggestion is now a strict rule in most grammar books.  Even Strunk and Whiteís Elements of Style includes an elementary form of the rule.  If youíre interested in a more extensive discussion of less and fewer, you may wish to take a look at Merriam-Websterís Dictionary of English Usage.

    Can you trust your ear when deciding whether to use less and fewer?  Probably not.  Unless you have good reason or expert justification, follow the rule (and keep some reference sources nearby).

    By the way, Iíve decided Iíll stick with my old bank. It offers fewer services, but is less grammatically offensive.

    Do you have a grammar question? Comments? Suggestions? Please let me know.


    Immigration Daily: the news source for
    legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
    Enter your email address here: