ILW.COM - the immigration portal Immigration Daily

Immigration Daily: the news source for legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers

Home Page

Advanced search

Immigration Daily


RSS feed

Processing times

Immigration forms

Discussion board



Twitter feed

Immigrant Nation


CLE Workshops

Immigration books

Advertise on ILW

VIP Network


Chinese Immig. Daily


Connect to us

Make us Homepage



Immigration Daily


Chinese Immig. Daily

The leading
immigration law
publisher - over
50000 pages of free

Immigration LLC.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here:

< Back to current issue of Immigration Daily < Back to current issue of Immigrant's Weekly

EB-5 Immigrant Investors
by Stephen Yale-Loehr

EB-5 Immigrant Investors[1]

By Stephen Yale-Loehr (

Of Counsel, True, Walsh & Miller, Ithaca, NY ( Adjunct Professor, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY

Co-author, Immigration Law and Procedure (  

I.          OVERVIEW

            Congress created the employment-based fifth preference (EB-5) immigrant visa category in 1990 for immigrants seeking to enter to engage in a commercial enterprise that will benefit the U.S. economy and create at least 10 full-time jobs.[2]  The basic amount required to invest is $1 million, although that amount may be $500,000 if the investment is made in a “targeted employment area.”  Of the approximately 10,000 numbers available for this preference each year, 3,000 are reserved for entrepreneurs who invest in targeted employment areas through a pilot program.

A.        The Regular Program

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) §203(b)(5)[3] provides a yearly maximum of approximately 10,000 visas for applicants to invest in a new commercial enterprise employing at least 10 full-time U.S. workers.  To qualify under the EB-5 category, the new enterprise must: (1) have been established by the alien; (2) be one in which the alien has invested (or is in the process of investing) at least $1 million (or at least $500,000 if investing in a “targeted employment area,” discussed below) after November 29, 1990; and, (3) benefit the U.S. economy and create full-time employment for not fewer than 10 U.S. workers.  Moreover, the investor must have at least a policy-making role in the enterprise.

 B.      The Pilot Program

To encourage immigration through the EB-5 category, Congress created a temporary pilot program in 1993.[4]  The pilot program directs the Attorney General and Secretary of State to set aside 3,000 visas each year for seven years for people who invest at least $500,000 in “designated regional centers.”  The pilot program is currently due to expire September 30, 2000.[5]

The pilot program does not require that the immigrant investor enterprise itself employ 10 U.S. workers, as long as the investor can reasonably demonstrate that the regional center has indirectly created 10 or more jobs and improved regional productivity.  This program also differs from the regular EB-5 provisions in that it permits private and governmental agencies to be certified as regional centers if they meet certain criteria.[6]  (See Exhibit, Designated Regional Centers).

C.        Qualified Immigrants

Outside of the investment and employment requisites, the statute does not specifically address who may be a qualified applicant. The INS appears to preclude corporate or other non-individual investors from this category.  However, two or more individuals may join to make an EB-5 investment.  A single new commercial enterprise may be used for investor/employment-creation classification by more than one investor, provided that: (1) each petitioning investor has invested (or is actively in the process of investing) the required amount; and (2) each investment results in the creation of at least 10 full-time positions for qualifying employees.  In fact, a new commercial enterprise may be used for investor/employment-creation classification even though there are several owners of the enterprise, including persons not seeking classification, if: (1) the source(s) of all capital invested is identified; and (2) all invested capital has been derived by lawful means.

D.        The New Commercial Enterprise

A petitioner attempting to qualify for EB-5 classification generally may establish a new commercial enterprise in one of three ways: (1) creating an original business; (2) purchasing and restructuring an existing business; or (3) expanding, and thereby substantially changing the net worth or number of employees in a business so that there is a 40 percent increase in net worth or in the number of employees.[7] Investing in a “troubled” business may also qualify an investor for EB-5 classification.[8]

To qualify an enterprise as a “new commercial enterprise,” a petitioner must have invested after November 29, 1990.[9]  Any for-profit entity formed for the ongoing conduct of lawful business may serve as a commercial enterprise.  This includes sole proprietorships, partnerships (whether limited or general), holding companies, joint ventures, corporations, business trusts, or other entities publicly or privately owned.[10]  This definition would even include a holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, if each such subsidiary is engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business.  However, the term “new commercial enterprise” does not include noncommercial activity, such as owning and operating a personal residence.[11]  
1.         Troubled Businesses

 Special rules govern investments in “troubled” businesses. These rules encourage investments in companies experiencing financial difficulties.  A troubled business is one that has been in existence for at least two years, has incurred a net loss for accounting purposes during the 12 or 24-month period before the petition was filed, and the loss for such period is at least equal to 20 percent of the business’s net worth before the loss.[12]  To establish investment in a troubled business, the petitioner must also show that the number of existing employees will be maintained at no less than the pre-investment level for at least two years.  Thus, this provision includes a significant incentive in that it does not require the creation of 10 new jobs.  Instead, it requires only that the business maintain the number of existing employees during the conditional status period.[13]  As a caveat, if the troubled business does not remain afloat for two years after the investment, the alien investor might lose his or her conditional residency status.

2.         Buying an Existing Business

By reorganizing or restructuring an existing business, an investor may create a “new commercial enterprise” and therefore qualify for a visa.  The statute and regulations provide little insight into what degree of restructuring or reorganization must be done to establish a new enterprise.  The INS’s Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) has held that simply changing the legal form of the enterprise does not satisfy this requirement.[14]  Regardless of the forms used to create a new enterprise, the focus of the law is on the creation of at least 10 new employment opportunities.  Investments creating a new enterprise but failing to create 10 new jobs will also fail to qualify for the investor/employment-creation visa.

3.         Expanding an Existing Business

An investor can also create a new enterprise by expanding an existing business.  Only an expansion resulting in an increase of at least 40 percent in the net worth of the business or in the number of employees of the business will satisfy the visa requirements.[15]  This could require the investor to create more than 10 new jobs to qualify for a visa.  The larger the business that the investor expands, the more onerous his or her burden to qualify for a visa under this standard. 

4.         Pooling Arrangements

The regulations specifically provide for investments to be pooled with investments of others seeking permanent investor visas.[16]  Each investor is required to invest the applicable statutory amount.  All of the new jobs created by the new commercial enterprise will be allocated among those within the pool seeking permanent investor visas.[17]

E.         “Engaging” in a New Commercial Enterprise

  The statute requires an EB-5 applicant seek to enter the United States to engage in a new commercial enterprise.[18]  To qualify, an alien investor must maintain more than a passive role in the new enterprise upon which the petition is based.  The regulations require an EB-5 immigrant to be involved in the management of the new commercial enterprise.[19]  The petitioner must either be involved in the day-to-day managerial control of the commercial enterprise or manage it through policy formulation. The degree of involvement by an EB-5 investor in the enterprise may be less than that required to qualify for a nonimmigrant E-2 treaty investor visa. If the petitioner is a corporate officer or board member, or, in the case of a limited partnership, is a limited partner under the provisions of the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (ULPA), he or she satisfies the requirement of engaging in the management of the new commercial enterprise.[20]

 F.         “Investing” or “Actively in the Process of Investing” “Capital”  

The statute requires an EB-5 petitioner to have invested or be in the process of investing.  The term “invest” means to contribute capital.  A contribution of capital in exchange for a note, bond, convertible debt, obligation, or any other debt arrangement between the alien entrepreneur and the new commercial enterprise does not constitute a contribution of capital and will not constitute an investment.[21]

  The regulations define “capital” as cash and cash equivalents, equipment, inventory, and other tangible property.[22] Capital does not include loans by the petitioner or other parties.[23]  Indebtedness secured by assets owned by the alien entrepreneur may be considered capital, provided the investor is personally and primarily liable for the debts and the assets of the enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness.[24]

  Indebtedness typically consists of a promissory note signed by the petitioner that specifies a payment schedule to the new commercial enterprise.  Absent fraud, a signed promissory note that is secured by the petitioner’s personal assets constitutes a contribution of capital by the petitioner.  The issuer of the promissory note, i.e., the alien investor, is considered to be “at risk” if the petitioner is clearly obligated to make all the required payments on the note and there are no “escape” clauses.  The investor cannot receive any bond, note, or other debt arrangement from the enterprise for the capital contributed to it.  This includes any stock redeemable at the holder’s request.  All capital is valued at fair market value in U.S. dollars at the time they are given.[25]

Debt arrangements are extremely complicated.  A prudent practitioner must do careful research and analysis to determine current INS positions and policies on this issue.[26]

             G.        Benefiting the U.S. Economy  

  The statute requires that investments “benefit the U.S. economy” to qualify the investor for an EB-5 visa or status.[27]  The statute provides no guidance on which investments benefit the economy.  This silence means INS adjudicators are left to their subjective interpretations of the investment and its relative benefits when reviewing the petition.  Arguably, the petitioner has benefited the economy by merely meeting the employment and investment requirements of the visa classification.  However, because the statute specifically identifies the “benefit” element as distinct from other components of the visa, it appears that the applicant must independently show that the enterprise, in the conduct of its business, will benefit the U.S. economy.  Therefore, a consulting firm exclusively serving customers abroad with no return benefit to the U.S. economy (other than employing the requisite number of workers), might not support an EB-5 petition.  In contrast, showing that the new enterprise provides goods or services to U.S. markets should satisfy this requirement.


  Federal regulation of foreign investment is extensive.  Some regulations restrict foreign investments in aviation, banking, shipping, communications, land use, energy resources, and government contracting.  Additionally, Congress has imposed several disclosure and data requirements on foreign investments.[28]  An investment may not be deemed beneficial to the U.S. economy if it runs afoul of any statutory limitation on foreign investment.

H.        Creating Employment


To qualify for EB-5 status, an investment must create full-time employment for at least 10 U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents or other immigrants lawfully authorized to be employed in the United States.[29]  The investor, his or her spouse and children do not count toward the 10 employee minimum.[30]  Nonimmigrants are also excluded from the count.  The “other immigrants” provision means that conditional residents, temporary residents, asylees, refugees, and recipients of suspension of deportation or cancellation of removal may all be considered employees for EB-5 purposes.


The regulations define an “employee” for EB-5 purposes as an individual who (1) provides services or labor for the new commercial enterprise and (2) receives wages or other remuneration directly from the new commercial enterprise.[31]  This definition excludes independent contractors.[32]


The EB-5 pilot program does not require the investment to directly create 10 U.S. jobs.  Instead, pilot program investments only require an indirect creation of jobs and an improvement of the local economy.[33]


  1.         The Types of Jobs  

                       The jobs created must be full-time.  This means employment of a qualified employee in a position that requires a minimum of 35 working hours per week.[34]  Job-sharing arrangements, where two or more qualifying employees share a full-time position, will also serve as full-time employment if the hourly requirement per week is met.[35] Job-sharing does not include combinations of part-time positions even if when combined such positions meet the hourly requirement per week.[36]  

  2.         When the Jobs Must Exist   

                       The law is unclear about when new jobs must exist. The statutory language is prospective and therefore does not require jobs to exist at the time of initial investment or before the I-526 petition is filed.  The INS does not require retention of employees until a reasonable time after conditional visa issuance.  In fact, a petitioner may support a petition with a comprehensive business plan demonstrating a need for at least 10 employees within the next two years.  The business plan need only indicate the approximate dates during the following two years when the employees will be hired.  The temporary vacancy of a position during the two-year conditional period does not disqualify an investor, as long as good-faith attempts to re-staff the position are made.  

  3.         Where the Jobs Must be Located  

                         When enacting the EB-5 program, Congress took an affirmative step toward creating jobs in the geographic areas that need them most.  The statute sets aside 3,000 of the approximately 10,000 EB-5 visas available annually for alien entrepreneurs who invest in “targeted employment areas.”[37]  The statute defines a “targeted employment area” as a rural area or an area that has experienced high unemployment of at least 150 percent of the national average.[38]  An area not within a metropolitan statistical area (as designated by the Office of Management and Budget) or the outer boundary of any city or town having a population of 20,000 or more is considered a rural area.[39]  Each state notifies the INS which state agency will apply these guidelines, and determines targeted employment areas for that state.

The regular EB-5 program and the pilot program have similar requirements to begin the process.  The distinction between the two processes is that the former requires the petitioner to submit all of the described evidence; the latter requires the designated regional center to certify that the alien investor has met its criteria. 

In either case the investor files for EB-5 classification using Form I-526.  The petition must be signed by the investor, not someone acting on his or her behalf. If the EB-5 commercial enterprise will primarily do business in a location within the ordinary jurisdiction of the Vermont or Texas Service Centers, the petition is filed with the Texas Service Center; otherwise it is filed with the California Service Center.[40]  

            A.        Initial Evidence for the Regular EB-5 Program  

The following paragraphs detail the evidence that should be submitted with an I-526 petition for EB-5 classification under the regular program.  

  1.  The New Commercial Enterprise  

                         To qualify for EB-5 classification an investor must establish a “new commercial enterprise” in one of three ways:                                     a.         Starting a new and original business;                                  b.         Purchasing an existing business and restructuring its organization or operations enough to create a new business; or  c.         Expanding a business already within the United States.

                          To show that an investment has been made in a qualified commercial enterprise, the applicant should include:

                                    a. An organizational document for the new enterprise, including articles of incorporation, partnership agreements, certificates of merger and consolidation, or partnership agreements;

                                    b. A business license or authorization to transact business in a state or city; and

                                    c. For investments in an existing business, proof that the required amount of capital was transferred to the business after November 29, 1990, and that the investment has increased the net worth or number of employees by 40 percent or more.[41]

  2.         Capitalization

                        To show that the petitioner has invested (or is actively in the process of investing) the required amount of capital, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the petitioner has placed the required amount of capital at risk.  A mere intention to invest will not demonstrate that the petitioner is actively in the process of investing.  The alien must show actual commitment of the required amount of capital.  Such evidence may include:

                         a.         Bank statements showing deposits in the U.S. account of the enterprise;

                         b.         Evidence of assets purchased for use in the enterprise;

                         c.         Evidence of property transferred from abroad;  

                         d.         Evidence of funds invested in the enterprise in exchange for stock, except for stock redeemable at the holder’s request; e.         Evidence of debts secured by the investor’s assets and for which the investor is personally and primarily liable.[42]

3.         Legal Acquisition of Capital

                        The regulations require filing the following types of documentation to establish that capital used in the new enterprise was acquired by legitimate means:

a. Foreign business registration records;
b. Personal and business tax returns, or other tax returns of any kind filed anywhere in the world within the previous five years; 
c. Documents identifying any other source of money; or
d. Certified copies of all pending governmental civil or criminal actions and proceedings, or any private civil actions involving money judgments against the investor within the past 15 years.[43]

4.         Creating Employment

                        To show that a new commercial enterprise will create no less than 10 full-time positions for qualified employees, the petition must be accompanied by: 

a.         Photocopies of relevant tax records, Forms I-9, or similar documents for 10 qualifying employees; or 

b.         A comprehensive business plan showing the need for not fewer than 10 qualifying employees, and when the employees will be hired.[44] The plan must include a description of the business; the business’s objectives; a market analysis including names of competing businesses and their relative strengths and weaknesses; a comparison of the competition’s products and pricing structures; a description of the target market and prospective customers; a description of any manufacturing or production processes, materials required and supply sources; details of any contracts executed; marketing strategy including pricing, advertising, and servicing; organizational structure; and sales, cost and income projections and details of the bases therefor.  In addition, specifically with respect to employment, the business plan must set forth the company’s personnel experience, staffing requirements, job descriptions for all positions, and a timetable for hiring.[45]
 5.         Troubled Business

                        To show that a new enterprise, established through capital investment in a troubled business, meets the statutory requirement, the petition must show that the number of existing employees will be maintained at no less than the pre-investment level for a period of at least two years.  The applicant should include photocopies of the I-9 forms, tax records or payroll documents, and a comprehensive business plan.[46]

                        6.         Managerial Capacity of the Investor

                         An investor/employment-creation immigrant must be involved in the management of a new commercial enterprise to qualify for a visa.  The petitioner must either be involved in the day-to-day managerial control of the enterprise, or manage it through policy formulation.  These requirements may be evidenced by:

                                   a.         A comprehensive job description for the position occupied by the investor. The petitioner’s title should also be indicated;

                                    b.         Evidence that the petitioner is a corporate officer or on the board of directors; or

                                    c.         Evidence that the petitioner is involved in direct management activities or policymaking activities of a general or limited partnership.  A limited partner must also show that he has rights, powers and duties commensurate with those normally granted under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act.[47]

                         7.         Designation of a High Unemployment Area

                        The state government may designate a particular geographic or political subdivision as an area of high unemployment (at least 150 percent of the national average rate). Evidence of such designation may be provided with Form I-526. Such evidence should include:

                                    a.         Boundaries of the subdivision; and

                                    b.         The methods by which the statistics were gathered.[48]
 8.         The Investment Must Benefit the U.S. Economy

                        This requirement has not been fully defined in the regulations.  Letters from local government officials, chambers of commerce, or regional development agencies should satisfy the requirement and should be included with the petition.

9.         Creation of Employment in a Targeted Employment Area 

                         To show that the new commercial enterprise has created, or will create, employment in a targeted employment area, the petition must be accompanied by:

a.  For a rural area, evidence that the new commercial enterprise is not located within any standard metropolitan statistical area, or within any city or town having a population of 20,000 or more; or

b.         For a high unemployment area, evidence that the metropolitan statistical area, or the county in which a city or town with a population of 20,000 or more is located, in which the new commercial enterprise is principally doing business has experienced an average unemployment rate of 150 percent of the national average rate; or a letter from the state in which the new commercial enterprise is located which certifies that the area has been designated as a high unemployment area.[49]

B.        Pilot Program

An investment under the pilot program must be made in a commercial enterprise located within a “regional center,” defined by regulation as “any economic unit, public or private, which is involved with the promotion of economic growth, including increased export sales, improved regional productivity, job creation, and increased domestic capital investment.”[50] A center seeking INS approval must submit a proposal showing how it plans to focus on a geographical region within the United States and to achieve the required growth by the means specified.[51 The proposal must show “in verifiable detail how jobs will be created indirectly through increased exports,” as well as the amount and source of capital committed and the promotional efforts made and planned.[52]  The Exhibit at the end of this article contains a list of designated regional centers. To qualify for EB-5 classification under the pilot program, the applicant must make the qualifying investment (i.e., in the amount required under the basic program) within an approved regional center. However, the requirement of creating at least 10 new jobs is met by a showing that as a result of the new enterprise, such jobs will be created directly or indirectly through revenues generated from increased exports.[53] To file an I-526 form under the pilot program, attach a copy of the INS letter designating the regional center. The petitioner’s new commercial enterprise must be within the area specified in that letter. If the commercial enterprise is involved directly or indirectly in lending money to job-creating businesses, it may only lend money to businesses located within targeted employment areas to take advantage of the lesser capital requirement ($500,000).[54]  The businesses receiving the loans must be within the geographic limits of the regional center, if the enterprise is to qualify under the pilot program; otherwise the enterprise is not promoting economic growth through “improved regional activity” as required by the regulations.


Assuming the INS approves an investor’s I-526 petition under either the regular or pilot program, he or she becomes a conditional resident for two years. The procedure to remove the conditions is similar to that followed by people who obtain conditional residence through marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.[55]  An immigrant investor’s petition to remove the conditions should be filed on Form I-829 with the relevant service center,[56] and must be accompanied by evidence that a commercial enterprise was established, that the alien invested or was in the process of investing the required capital, and that the alien created or will create 10 full-time jobs. The alien also must show that he or she “sustained the actions required for removal of conditions” during the alien’s residence in the United States. An alien entrepreneur will have met this requirement if he or she has “substantially met” the capital investment requirement and has continuously maintained this investment during the conditional period.[57]

Ordinarily, no interview is requested. But if the INS service center believes that the conditions have not been met, or if fraud is suspected,  it will ask the district office to interview the investor.[58]


The statute provides three separate grounds for terminating an EB-5 investor’s status during the two-year conditional period.[59] Immigrant status will be terminated if the INS determines that:

             The new commercial enterprise was established to evade the immigration laws of the United States.[60]  This provision requires termination only if the enterprise was formed solely to evade immigration laws.  This suggests that if an enterprise was formed with legitimate intentions, in addition to an intention to fraudulently procure permanent resident status, termination would not be proper;

             The alien did not establish a commercial enterprise, failed to invest (or was not in the process of investing) the requisite capital, or failed to sustain the investments during the two-year conditional period;[61] or

             The alien was otherwise not conforming to the requirements of the employment-creation status provisions of INA §203(b)(5).[62]  This catch-all provision is dangerous because it does not define the conduct giving rise to termination of status.  The INS could potentially apply this provision broadly to terminate the investor status of an applicant for any infraction of the section.

 An EB-5 investor admitted under the pilot program is also subject to the same conditions and restrictions.


In enacting the EB-5 program, Congress expressed concern about the possibility of fraudulent investments.  To deter such fraud, establishing a commercial enterprise for the purpose of “evading any provision of the immigration laws” is a felony punishable by up to five years imprisonment.[63]  One reason Congress provided for two-year conditional permanent residency status for EB-5 investors is to aid in this deterrence.  This two-year continuum for business activity and investment requires a significant investment and is a strong deterrent to fraud. Nonetheless, should fraud be discovered by the INS before the two-year conditional period ends, the investor’s status will be terminated.[64]


The statutory and regulatory provisions discussed above are onerous.  For this reason, immigration through the EB-5 category has never approached the maximum of about 10,000 a year.  Yet the INS radically restricted the EB-5 program even further in 1998 by issuing four precedent AAO decisions that make it even harder to obtain EB-5 status.[65] Based on informal INS data, it appears that the INS approves only about 10 percent of I-526 petitions currently filed.

A complete discussion of the four precedent decisions is beyond the scope of this basics article.  Below is a summary of the changes created by the four decisions.  The post-AAO requirements are listed first; prior law or policy is listed in italics.[66]

            New:    Promissory note valued at fair market value.

            Old:     Promissory note valued at face value.

             New:    Promissory note must generally be paid after two years.

            Old:     No limit on term of promissory note.

            New:    Security for promissory note needs to be perfected under the UCC.

            Old:     Security does not need to meet UCC perfected security interest requirements.

            New:    Bank accounts cannot be used as security.

            Old:     Bank accounts can be used as security.

            New:    Reduce the fair market value of promissory note by “considerable expense and effort” to execute on foreign assets.

            Old:     Promissory note valued at face value.

            New:    No redemption provisions can be agreed to prior to end of conditional residence and prior to conclusion of payments on promissory note.

            Old:     Redemption provisions can be agreed to so long as redemption does not occur until after promissory note has been paid in full.

            New:    Third party guarantees to investor prohibited.

            Old:     Third party guarantee allowed unless backed by government obligation.

            New:    Amounts attributable to expenses to start new commercial enterprise must be deducted from capital contribution.

            Old:     Start-up costs and expenses included in amount of capital contribution.

            New:    Investor must be “present at inception” of new commercial enterprise.  

            Old:     No such requirement previously.

             New:    New ownership and new corporation are not sufficient to establish new commercial enterprise.

            Old:     Restructuring or reorganization sufficient to establish new commercial enterprise.

             New:    All of the activities must benefit the targeted geographical area to count indirect employment.

            Old:     The qualifying investment must be within the approved regional center; there is no separate requirement to prove benefit solely to the regional center.

Qualifying a person for EB-5 status is one of the most complicated subspecialties in immigration law.  A sophisticated knowledge of corporate, tax, investment, and immigration law are all required.  Moreover, the four 1998 precedent AAO decisions have made it even harder to obtain approvals of EB-5 petitions.  Investors must discard normal investment opportunities in favor of investments structured to meet the unrealistic requirements of the precedent decisions.  Attorneys, in turn, must proceed at their peril in advising clients.  Hopefully the courts or Congress will clarify this area of the law to make permanent residence through investment a realistic visa option.


Designated Regional Centers[67]

World Trade Center/Greenville-Spartenburg Inc.

315 Old Boiling Springs Road

Greer, SC 29650

 Beacon U.S. Studios Inc.

5610 Sanderling Way

Blaine, WA 98230

 City of New Orleans

Mayor’s Economic Development Department

1300 Perdido Street, Suite 8E10

New Orleans, LA 70112


North Country Alliance

One Lincoln Boulevard

Rouses Point, NY 12979


Aero-Space Port International Group

512 Strander Boulevard

Tukwila, WA 98188


North Texas Commission

P.O. Box 610246

DFW Airport, TX 75261


Legacy Project

1100 Spring Street, Suite 600

Atlanta, GA 30309


Abacus Advisors, Inc.

195 Boston Post Road

Weston, MA 02193


American Export Partners

10 State Street

Charleston, SC 29401


Danou Enterprises

World Trade Center Detroit/Windsor

1251 Fort Street

Trenton, MI 48183

Pueblo Economic Development Corporation

P.O. Box 5807

Pueblo, CO 81002


GV Development

7525 W. Highway 68

P.O. Box 10430

Golden Valley, AZ 86413-2430


Unibex Global Corporation

1201 Eleanor Avenue

Las Vegas, NV 89106


State of Hawaii, Department of Business,

Economic Development & Tourism

P.O. Box 2359

Honolulu, HI 96804


Atlanta International Center for Academic (sic) and Athletics

1131 Alpharetta Street

Roswell, GA 30075


The Gateway Freedom Fund (AKA: Golden Rainbow Freedom Fund)

18034 13th Street

Seattle, WA 98177


West Rand Gold Trust

P.O. Box 2222

Ridgecrest, CA 93556


Miami Chinese Community Center, Ltd.

331 NE 18th Street

Miami, FL 33132


CKS Western Inc. World Trade Center

620 W. Graham Drive

Lake Elsinore, CA 92530


Empirical Entertainment

6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 2000

Hollywood, CA 90028


State of Vermont

Agency of Commerce and Community Development

109 State Street

Montpellier, VT 05609-0501


Trading Partners International of California LLC

2677 N. Main Street, Suite 930

Santa Ana, CA 92705


CMB Export LLC

Corona Professional Center

400 S. Ramona Avenue, Suite 212AA

Corona, CA 91719

[1]     Copyright © 2000 Stephen Yale-Loehr.  All rights reserved. Co-chair, American Immigration Lawyers Association Investors Committee, 1998-2000. This article originally appeared in American Immigration Lawyers Association, 2000-01 Immigration & Nationality Law Handbook 398 (2000).

[2]     INA §203(b)(5), 8 USC §1153(b)(5).

[3]     8 USC §1153(b)(5).

[4]     Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 102-395, §610, 106 Stat. 1828 ; S. Rep. No. 102-918 (1992).

[5]     Act of Nov. 26, 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-119, §116(a), 111 Stat. 2467.

[6]     8 CFR §204.6(m)(3).

[7]     8 CFR §204.6(h).

[8]     Id.; 8 CFR §204.6(j)(4)(ii).

[9]     Matter of [name not provided], EAC-91-184-50136, 12 Immigr. Rep. B2-51 (AAU Aug. 12, 1993) (denying petition as investment made before Nov. 29, 1990; alien’s documentation of “expanded business” deemed insufficient).

[10]    8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of commercial enterprise).

[11]    Id.

[12]    8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of troubled business).

[13]    8 CFR §204.6(h)(3); 8 CFR §204.6(j)(4)(ii).

[14]    Matter of [name not provided], A75-642-890 (AAO July 12, 1999) (restaurant).

[15]    8 CFR §204.6(h)(3).

[16]    8 CFR §204.6(g).

[17]    See generally H. R. Klasko, “Pooled Investment Arrangements: Unraveling the Controversy,” 2 1998-99 Immigration & Nationality Law Handbook 107, R. P. Murphy, A. Novick, eds. (AILA 1998); A. J. Vasquez-Aspiri, “The Role of Commercial Organizations in the EB-5 Employment Process,” 2 Bender’s Immigration Bulletin 813 (Oct. 15, 1997).

[18]    INA §203(b)(5)(A), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(A).

[19]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(5).

[20]    Id.  See also 73 Interpreter Releases 48, 55 (Jan. 10, 1996).

[21]    See 8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of “invest”).

[22]    Id. (definition of “capital”).

[23]    Matter of Soffici, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-25 (Int. Dec.  3359, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations June 25, 1998).

[24]    8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of “capital”).

[25]    Matter of Izumii, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-32 (Int. Dec. No. 3360, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations July 13, 1998) (finding that investor failed to show how bank accounts in Japan were in trust or otherwise secured the note, as required by 8 CFR §204.6(e), and that the note was not readily enforceable and was in any event not now worth its face value payable over six years).

[26]    See generally W. Cook, “Somewhere, Over the Rainbow…Lies the EB-5 Pot of Gold,” 3 Bender’s Immigration Bulletin 1205 (Dec. 1, 1998); H. R. Klasko, “Pooled Investment Arrangements: Unraveling the Controversy,” 2 1998-99 Immigration & Nationality Law Handbook 107, R. P. Murphy, A. Novick, eds. (AILA 1998).

[27]    INA §203(b)(5)(A)(iii), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(A)(iii).

[28]    For a comprehensive summary of the regulations, see Mayans, Williams, Griffin, and Pattison, Manual of Foreign Investment in the United States (1994).

[29]    INA §203(b)(5)(A)(iii), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(A)(iii).

[30]    Id.

[31]    8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of “employee”).

[32]    Id.

[33]    Id.

[34]    8 CFR §204.6(e) (definition of “full-time employment”).

[35]    Id.

[36]    Id.

[37]    INA §203(b)(5)(B), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(B).

[38]    INA §203(b)(5)(B)(ii), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(B)(ii).

[39]    INA §203(b)(5)(B)(iii), 8 USC §1153(b)(5)(B)(iii).

[40]    See 63 Fed. Reg. 67,135 (Dec. 4, 1998).

[41]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(1).

[42]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(2).

[43]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(3).

[44]           8 CFR §204.6(j)(4)(i).

[45]    Matter of Ho, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-99 (Int. Dec.  3362, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations July 31, 1998).

[46]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(4)(ii).

[47]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(5).

[48]    8 CFR §204.6(i).

[49]    8 CFR §204.6(j)(6).

[50]    8 CFR §204.6(e).

[51]    8 CFR §204.6(m)(3).

[52]    Id.

[53]    8 CFR §§204.6(j)(4)(iii), 204.6(m)(7).

[54]    Matter of Izumii, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-32 (Int. Dec.  3360, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations July 13, 1998).

[55]    See INA §216, 8 USC §1186a.

[56]    8 CFR §216.6.

[57]    8 CFR §216.6(a)(4).

[58]    Memorandum from T. Alexander Aleinikoff, INS Acting Executive Assoc. Comm’r, File No. HQ. 204.27-P (July 18, 1995), discussed and reproduced in 72 Interpreter Releases 1091, Appendix III (Aug. 14, 1995).

[59]    INA §216A(b), 8 USC §1186b(b).

[60]    INA §216A(b)(1)(A), 8 USC §1186b(b)(1)(A).

[61]    INA §216A(b)(1)(B), 8 USC §1186b(b)(1)(B).

[62]    INA §216A(b)(1)(C), 8 USC §1186b(b)(1)(C).

[63]    INA §275(d), 8 USC §1325(d).

[64]    INA §216A(b)(1), 8 USC §1186b(b)(1).

[65]    Matter of Soffici, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-25 (Int. Dec. 3359, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations, June 25, 1998); Matter of Izumii, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-32 (Int. Dec. 3360, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations, July 13, 1998); Matter of Hsiung, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-106 (Int. Dec. 3361, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations, July 31, 1998); Matter of Ho, 22 I&N Dec. __, 19 Immigr. Rep. B2-99 (Int. Dec. 3362, Assoc. Comm’r, Examinations, July 31, 1998).  See generally W. Cook, “Somewhere, Over the Rainbow…Lies the EB-5 Pot of Gold,” 3 Bender’s Immigration Bulletin 1205 (Dec. 1, 1998).

[66]    Thanks to H. Ronald Klasko, who drafted this list of changes and allowed them to be reprinted here.

[67]    Memorandum from Michael L. Aytes, INS Ass’t Comm’r, “Designation of Regional Centers Under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program,” File No. HQ 7C/6.2.5 (Sept. 3, 1997), reproduced in 74 Interpreter Releases 1881 (Dec. 8, 1997).

Stephen Yale-Loehr is the author (with Stanley Mailman) of Immigration Law and Procedure, published by Matthew Bender and Company, Inc.

Mr. Yale-Loehr ( is of counsel at True, Walsh & Miller in Ithaca, New York, and teaches immigration law at Cornell Law School.

A prior version of this article appeared in the New York Law Journal, which is on the Internet at The author thanks the Journal for granting permission to reprint and revise that article..

Page format Copyright © 2000, American Immigration LLC. ,ILW.COM .All rights reserved worldwide.

Immigration Daily: the news source for
legal professionals. Free! Join 35000+ readers
Enter your email address here: